Literature DB >> 26088767

Orthopaedic Surgeons Receive the Most Industry Payments to Physicians but Large Disparities are Seen in Sunshine Act Data.

Andre M Samuel1, Matthew L Webb, Adam M Lukasiewicz, Daniel D Bohl, Bryce A Basques, Glenn S Russo, Vinay K Rathi, Jonathan N Grauer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Industry payments made to physicians by drug and device manufacturers or group purchasing organizations are now reported to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as a part of the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. Initial reports from the program show that orthopaedic surgeons lead all physician specialties in total and average industry payments. However, before further discussion of these payments and their implications can take place, it remains to be seen whether these figures are a true reflection of the field of orthopaedic surgery in general, rather than the result of a few outlier physicians in the field. In addition, the nature and sources of these funds should be determined to better inform the national dialogue surrounding these payments. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) How do industry payments to orthopaedic surgeons compare with payments to physicians and surgeons in other fields, in terms of median payments and the Gini index of disparity? (2) How much do payments to the highest-receiving orthopaedic surgeons contribute to total payments? (3) What kind of industry payments are orthopaedic surgeons receiving? (4) How much do the highest-paying manufacturers contribute to total payments to orthopaedic surgeons?
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the most recent version of the CMS Sunshine Act Open Payments database released on December 19, 2014, containing data on payments made between August 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013. Data on total payments to individual physicians, physician specialty, the types of payments made, and the manufacturers making payments were reviewed. The Gini index of statistical dispersion was calculated for payments made to orthopaedic surgeons and compared with payments made to physicians and surgeons in all other medical specialties. A Gini index of 0 indicates complete equality of payments to everyone in the population, whereas an index of 1 indicates complete inequality, or all income going to one individual.
RESULTS: A total of 15,376 orthopaedic surgeons receiving payments during the 5-month period were identified, accounting for USD 109,846,482. The median payment to orthopaedic surgeons receiving payments was USD 121 (interquartile range, USD 34-619). The top 10% of orthopaedic surgeons receiving payments (1538 surgeons) received at least USD 4160 and accounted for 95% of total payments. Royalties and patent licenses accounted for 69% of all industry payments to orthopaedic surgeons.
CONCLUSIONS: Even as a relatively small specialty, orthopaedic surgeons received substantial payments from industry (more than USD 110 million) during the 5-month study period. Whether there is a true return of value from these payments remains to be seen; however, future ethical and policy discussions regarding industry payments to orthopaedic surgeons should take into account the large disparities in payments that are present and also the nature of the payments being made. It is possible that patients and policymakers may view industry payments to orthopaedic surgeons more positively in light of these new findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Economic and Decision Analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26088767      PMCID: PMC4562921          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4413-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  45 in total

Review 1.  Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Yan Li; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Physician entrepreneurs, self-referral, and conflicts of interest: an overview.

Authors:  David M Zientek
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2003-06

3.  All gifts large and small: toward an understanding of the ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift-giving.

Authors:  Dana Katz; Arthur L Caplan; Jon F Merz
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  The effects of pharmaceutical firm enticements on physician prescribing patterns. There's no such thing as a free lunch.

Authors:  J P Orlowski; L Wateska
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Relationships with industry: critical for new technology or an unnecessary evil?

Authors:  Joshua J Jacobs; Jorge O Galante; Sohail K Mirza; Thomas Zdeblick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The orthopaedic profession and the industry partnership.

Authors:  Roy D Crowninshield; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Conflict of interest in orthopaedic research. An association between findings and funding in scientific presentations.

Authors:  Kanu Okike; Mininder S Kocher; Charles T Mehlman; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Pharmaceutical company payments to physicians: early experiences with disclosure laws in Vermont and Minnesota.

Authors:  Joseph S Ross; Josh E Lackner; Peter Lurie; Cary P Gross; Sidney Wolfe; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Physicians' behavior and their interactions with drug companies. A controlled study of physicians who requested additions to a hospital drug formulary.

Authors:  M M Chren; C S Landefeld
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Patient perspectives on physician conflict of interest in industry-sponsored clinical trials for multiple sclerosis therapeutics.

Authors:  Andrew J Solomon; Eran P Klein; John R Corboy; James L Bernat
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.312

View more
  24 in total

1.  Industry Payments to Urologists in 2014: an Analysis of the Open Payments Program.

Authors:  Parth K Modi; Nicholas J Farber; Michael E Zavaski; Thomas L Jang; Eric A Singer; Steven L Chang
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2017-07

2.  Editorial: Is It Time to End Surgeon-Industry Consulting?

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Association of Gender With Financial Relationships Between Industry and Academic Otolaryngologists.

Authors:  Jean Anderson Eloy; Michael Bobian; Peter F Svider; Ashley Culver; Bianca Siegel; Stacey T Gray; Soly Baredes; Sujana S Chandrasekhar; Adam J Folbe
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Urology Payments from Industry in the Sunshine Act.

Authors:  Jathin Bandari; Robert M Turner; Bruce L Jacobs; Benjamin J Davies
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2016-09

5.  Editorial: What CORR® Seeks From Papers About New Implants and Techniques.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold; Matthew B Dobbs; Mark C Gebhardt; Terence J Gioe; Paul A Manner; Raphaël Porcher; Clare M Rimnac; Montri D Wongworawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Industry Payments to Plastic Surgeons: What Has Changed Over the Last 6 Years Following Implementation of the Physician Payments Sunshine Act?

Authors:  Rowland W Pettit; Jordan Kaplan; Matthew M Delancy; Edward Reece; Sebastian Winocour; Anaeze C Offodile; Anand Kumar; Carrie K Chu
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.485

7.  The Dawn of Transparency: Insights from the Physician Payment Sunshine Act in Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Rizwan Ahmed; Joseph Lopez; Sunjae Bae; Allan B Massie; Eric K Chow; Karan Chopra; Babak J Orandi; Bonnie E Lonze; James W May; Justin M Sacks; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 8.  Disclosure of Industry Payments to Physicians: An Epidemiologic Analysis of Early Data From the Open Payments Program.

Authors:  Deborah C Marshall; Madeleine E Jackson; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Characteristics of Industry Payments to Ophthalmologists in the Open Payments Database.

Authors:  Dane H Slentz; Christine C Nelson; Paul R Lichter
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 7.389

10.  Types and Distribution of Payments From Industry to Physicians in 2015.

Authors:  Kathryn R Tringale; Deborah Marshall; Tim K Mackey; Michael Connor; James D Murphy; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.