Literature DB >> 26088511

Multimodality Intravascular Imaging to Predict Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Annapoorna S Kini1, Sadako Motoyama2, Yuliya Vengrenyuk2, Jonathan E Feig2, Jacobo Pena2, Usman Baber2, Arjun M Bhat2, Pedro Moreno2, Jason C Kovacic2, Jagat Narula2, Samin K Sharma2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare the relative merits of optical coherence tomography (OCT), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in patients with coronary artery disease for the prediction of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI).
BACKGROUND: Although several individual intravascular imaging modalities have been employed to predict periprocedural MI, it is unclear which of the imaging tools would best allow prediction of this complication.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 110 patients who underwent OCT, IVUS, and NIRS. Periprocedural MI was defined as a post-procedural cardiac troponin I (cTnI) elevation above 3× the upper limit of normal; analysis was also performed for cTnI ≥5× the upper limit of normal.
RESULTS: cTnI ≥3× was observed in 10 patients (9%) and 8 patients had cTnI ≥5×. By OCT, minimum cap thickness was significantly lower (55 vs. 90 μm, p < 0.01), and the plaque burden by IVUS (84 ± 9% vs. 77 ± 8%, p < 0.01) and maximum 4-mm lipid core burden index by NIRS (556 vs. 339, p < 0.01) were greater in the cTnI ≥3× group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified cap thickness as the only independent predictor for cTnI ≥3× the upper limit of normal (odds ratio [OR]: 0.90, p = 0.02) or cTnI ≥5× (OR: 0.91, p = 0.04). If OCT findings were excluded from the analysis, plaque burden (OR: 1.13, p = 0.045) and maximum 4-mm lipid core burden index (OR: 1.003, p = 0.037) emerged to be the independent predictors.
CONCLUSIONS: OCT-based fibrous cap thickness is the most important predictor of periprocedural MI. In the absence of information about cap thickness, NIRS lipid core or IVUS plaque burden best determined the likelihood of the periprocedural event.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery disease; fibrous cap thickness; intravascular imaging; percutaneous coronary intervention; periprocedural myocardial infarction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26088511     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  19 in total

1.  Coronary plaque redistribution after stent implantation is determined by lipid composition: A NIRS-IVUS analysis.

Authors:  Tomasz Roleder; Magdalena Dobrolinska; Elzbieta Pociask; Wojciech Wanha; Grzegorz Smolka; Wojciech Walkowicz; Radoslaw Parma; Mariusz Lebek; Tomasz Bochenek; Przemysław Pietraszewski; Elvin Kedhi; Andrzej Ochala; Zbigniew Gasior; Ziad A Ali; Wojciech Wojakowski
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 2.  The Role of Intracoronary Plaque Imaging with Intravascular Ultrasound, Optical Coherence Tomography, and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Vu Hoang; Jill Grounds; Don Pham; Salim Virani; Ihab Hamzeh; Athar Mahmood Qureshi; Nasser Lakkis; Mahboob Alam
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Long-term changes after carotid stenting assessed by intravascular ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Cyril Štěchovský; Petr Hájek; Robert Roland; Martin Horváth; Josef Veselka
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-12

4.  Relationship between hemoglobin A1C and characteristics of plaque vulnerability in stable coronary disease: an optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Hiroki Ueyama; Keisuke Yasumura; Naotaka Okamoto; Yuliya Vengrenyuk; Nitin Barman; Benjamin Benhuri; Vishal Kapur; Choudhury Hasan; Joseph Sweeny; Samin K Sharma; Jagat Narula; Annapoorna S Kini; Usman Baber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Emerging Technology Update Intravascular Photoacoustic Imaging of Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque.

Authors:  Min Wu; Antonius Fw van der Steen; Evelyn Regar; Gijs van Soest
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2016-10

Review 6.  Optical Coherence Tomography of the Coronary Arteries.

Authors:  Robert Roland; Josef Veselka
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2021-02-12

7.  OCT-measured plaque free wall angle is indicative for plaque burden: overcoming the main limitation of OCT?

Authors:  Ayla Hoogendoorn; Muthukaruppan Gnanadesigan; Guillaume Zahnd; Nienke S van Ditzhuijzen; Johan C H Schuurbiers; Gijs van Soest; Evelyn Regar; Jolanda J Wentzel
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Intracoronary Imaging in the Detection of Vulnerable Plaques.

Authors:  Jonathan A Batty; Shristy Subba; Peter Luke; Li Wing Chi Gigi; Hannah Sinclair; Vijay Kunadian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Predictive Value of Aortic Valve Calcification for Periprocedural Myocardial Injury in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Yohei Shibata; Hideki Ishii; Susumu Suzuki; Akihito Tanaka; Yosuke Tatami; Shingo Harata; Tomoyuki Ota; Yusaku Shimbo; Yohei Takayama; Ayako Kunimura; Kenshi Hirayama; Kazuhiro Harada; Naohiro Osugi; Toyoaki Murohara
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.928

10.  OCT-Derived Plaque Morphology and FFR-Determined Hemodynamic Relevance in Intermediate Coronary Stenoses.

Authors:  Mariusz Tomaniak; Dorota Ochijewicz; Łukasz Kołtowski; Adam Rdzanek; Arkadiusz Pietrasik; Jacek Jąkała; Magdalena Slezak; Krzysztof P Malinowski; Martyna Zaleska; Jakub Maksym; Piotr Barus; Tomasz Roleder; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Grzegorz Opolski; Janusz Kochman
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.