Literature DB >> 26087505

Assessment and classification of early-stage multiple sclerosis with inertial sensors: comparison against clinical measures of disease state.

Barry R Greene, Stephanie Rutledge, Iain McGurgan, Christopher McGuigan, Karen OConnell, Brian Caulfield, Niall Tubridy.   

Abstract

A cross-sectional study on patients with early-stage multiple sclerosis (MS) was conducted to examine the reliability of manual and automatic mobility measures derived from shank-mounted inertial sensors during the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, compared to control subjects. Furthermore, we aimed to determine if disease status [as measured by the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-20) and the Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS)] can be explained by measurements obtained using inertial sensors. We also aimed to determine if patients with early-stage MS could be automatically distinguished from healthy controls subjects, using inertial parameters recorded during the TUG test. The mobility of 38 patients (aged 25-65 years, 14 M, 24 F), diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS and 33 healthy controls (14 M, 19 F, age 50-65), was assessed using the TUG test, while patients wore inertial sensors on each shank. Reliability analysis showed that 36 of 53 mobility parameters obtained during the TUG showed excellent intrasession reliability, while nine of 53 showed moderate reliability. This compared favorably with the reliability of the mobility parameters in healthy controls. Exploratory regression models of the EDSS and MSIS-20 scales were derived, using mobility parameters and an elastic net procedure in order to determine which mobility parameters influence disease state. A cross-validated elastic net regularized regression model for MSIS-20 yielded a mean square error (MSE) of 1.1 with 10 degrees of freedom (DoF). Similarly, an elastic net regularized regression model for EDSS yielded a cross-validated MSE of 1.3 with 10 DoF. Classification results show that the mobility parameters of participants with early-stage MS could be distinguished from controls with 96.90% accuracy. Results suggest that mobility parameters derived from MS patients while completing the TUG test are reliable, are associated with disease state in MS, and may have utility in screening for early-stage MS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26087505     DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2435057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform        ISSN: 2168-2194            Impact factor:   5.772


  12 in total

1.  Mastication Evaluation With Unsupervised Learning: Using an Inertial Sensor-Based System.

Authors:  Caroline Vieira Lucena; Marcelo Lacerda; Rafael Caldas; Fernando Buarque De Lima Neto; Diego Rativa
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.316

2.  Validity and reliability of inertial sensors for elbow and wrist range of motion assessment.

Authors:  Vanina Costa; Óscar Ramírez; Abraham Otero; Daniel Muñoz-García; Sandra Uribarri; Rafael Raya
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Interval Coded Scoring: a toolbox for interpretable scoring systems.

Authors:  Lieven Billiet; Sabine Van Huffel; Vanya Van Belle
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2018-04-02

4.  Classification of Horse Gaits Using FCM-Based Neuro-Fuzzy Classifier from the Transformed Data Information of Inertial Sensor.

Authors:  Jae-Neung Lee; Myung-Won Lee; Yeong-Hyeon Byeon; Won-Sik Lee; Keun-Chang Kwak
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  Technologies for Advanced Gait and Balance Assessments in People with Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Camille J Shanahan; Frederique M C Boonstra; L Eduardo Cofré Lizama; Myrte Strik; Bradford A Moffat; Fary Khan; Trevor J Kilpatrick; Anneke van der Walt; Mary P Galea; Scott C Kolbe
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Instrumented balance and walking assessments in persons with multiple sclerosis show strong test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Jordan J Craig; Adam P Bruetsch; Sharon G Lynch; Fay B Horak; Jessie M Huisinga
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Quantifying Variation in Gait Features from Wearable Inertial Sensors Using Mixed Effects Models.

Authors:  Kellen Garrison Cresswell; Yongyun Shin; Shanshan Chen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Digital assessment of falls risk, frailty, and mobility impairment using wearable sensors.

Authors:  Barry R Greene; Killian McManus; Stephen J Redmond; Brian Caulfield; Charlene C Quinn
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2019-12-11

9.  Thigh-Derived Inertial Sensor Metrics to Assess the Sit-to-Stand and Stand-to-Sit Transitions in the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Task for Quantifying Mobility Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Harry J Witchel; Cäcilia Oberndorfer; Robert Needham; Aoife Healy; Carina E I Westling; Joseph H Guppy; Jake Bush; Jens Barth; Chantal Herberz; Daniel Roggen; Björn M Eskofier; Waqar Rashid; Nachiappan Chockalingam; Jochen Klucken
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Gait Characteristics Harvested During a Smartphone-Based Self-Administered 2-Minute Walk Test in People with Multiple Sclerosis: Test-Retest Reliability and Minimum Detectable Change.

Authors:  Alan K Bourke; Alf Scotland; Florian Lipsmeier; Christian Gossens; Michael Lindemann
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.