Literature DB >> 26087397

Attrition with spinal cord stimulation.

Stacey A Mann1,2, Elizabeth Sparkes3, Rui V Duarte2,4, Jon H Raphael1,2.   

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to investigate whether spinal cord stimulation (SCS) significantly reduces pain intensity for up to 18-month follow-up in patients with chronic neuropathic pain. Forty-eight patients were recruited. Patients rated their pain using a Visual analog scale (VAS) and pain-related disability using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline (1 week prior to SCS surgery) and at 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up. Pain intensity significantly decreased from baseline to all 3 time points [F (3,135) = 16.264, p < 0.001]. The greatest difference in the reduction of pain intensity was observed between baseline (M = 7.20, SD = 1.34) and 6-month follow-up (M = 4.60, SD = 2.20), [t(47) = 6.741, p < 0.001]. However, when looking at differences between the 6-month follow-up and subsequent assessments, statistically significant increases in pain intensity from the 6-month to the 12-month follow-up [t(47) = -2.788, p = 0.008], and from the 6-month to the 18-month follow-up [t(47) = -3.339, p = 0.002] could be observed. Statistically significant changes were also observed for clinical changes in pain scores [F (2,94) = 4.972, p = 0.009. There was a significant decrease in the percentage of clinical change obtained from the 6-month (M = 33.19, SD = 35.63) to the 12-month follow-up (M = 23.76, SD = 33.62), [t(47) = 2.347, p = 0.025], and from the 6-month to the 18-month follow-up (M = 18.34, SD = 33.51), [t(47) = 3.072, p = 0.004]. A number of patients also reported higher levels of pain intensity at the 12-and 18-month follow-up than at baseline. Pain-related disability scores significantly decreased from baseline (M = 55.04, SD = 16.43) to the 6-month follow up (M = 46.98, SD = 19.05), [t(47) = 3.464, p = 0.001] and from baseline to the 12-month follow up (M = 48.49, SD = 20.94), [t(47) = 2.918, p = 0.005], but not during the 18-month follow up (M = 51.75, SD = 20.92), [t(47) = 1.330, p = .190]. There was a significant increase in pain-related disability between the 6- and the 18-month follow up [t(47) = -2.188. p = 0.034]. These findings suggest that the beneficial effect of SCS on pain intensity may diminish over time, and that the 6-month follow-up scores may reflect a placebo effect.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attrition; chronic pain; clinical efficacy; neuropathic pain; spinal cord stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26087397     DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1054352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0268-8697            Impact factor:   1.596


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Clinical Data on Salvage Therapy in Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Rajiv D Reddy; Roya Moheimani; Gregory G Yu; Krishnan V Chakravarthy
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-11-07

Review 2.  Spinal Cord Stimulation: Clinical Efficacy and Potential Mechanisms.

Authors:  Andrei D Sdrulla; Yun Guan; Srinivasa N Raja
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  The Challenge of Converting "Failed Spinal Cord Stimulation Syndrome" Back to Clinical Success, Using SCS Reprogramming as Salvage Therapy, through Neurostimulation Adapters Combined with 3D-Computerized Pain Mapping Assessment: A Real Life Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Philippe Rigoard; Amine Ounajim; Lisa Goudman; Tania Banor; France Héroux; Manuel Roulaud; Etienne Babin; Bénédicte Bouche; Philippe Page; Bertille Lorgeoux; Sandrine Baron; Nihel Adjali; Kevin Nivole; Mathilde Many; Elodie Charrier; Delphine Rannou; Laure Poupin; Chantal Wood; Romain David; Maarten Moens; Maxime Billot
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Intrathecal drug delivery systems for the management of chronic non-cancer pain: protocol for a systematic review of economic evaluations.

Authors:  Rui V Duarte; Tosin Lambe; Jon H Raphael; Sam Eldabe; Lazaros Andronis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Neurostimulation for Intractable Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Timothy R Deer; Sameer Jain; Corey Hunter; Krishnan Chakravarthy
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-01-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.