Literature DB >> 26087369

Correlates of oncologist-issued referrals for psycho-oncology services: what we learned from the electronic voluntary screening and referral system for depression (eVSRS-D).

Joo-Young Lee1, Dooyoung Jung1, Won-Hyoung Kim1, Hyuk-Joon Lee2, Dong-Young Noh2, Bong-Jin Hahm1,3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Depression in cancer patients is under-recognized and under-treated. To better identify depression, we designed a voluntary depression screening system. Based on its data, we examined trends in oncologist-issued referrals for the psycho-oncology service (POS).
METHODS: The Electronic Voluntary Screening and Referral System for Depression (eVSRS-D) comprises self-screening, automated reporting, and referral guidance. Using touch-screen kiosks at a tertiary hospital in Korea, participants with cancer completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 at their convenience, received the results, and reported their willingness to participate in POS. At oncology appointments, oncologists received the screening reports and issued referrals following pre-recommended guidelines. The correlates of actual referrals were examined across all participants and within the willing and non-willing groups.
RESULTS: Among the 838 participants, 56.3% reported severe depression symptoms, 30.5% wanted a referral, and 14.8% were actually referred. The correlates of participants' desire for referral were more severe depression symptoms, being unmarried, and being metastasis and recurrence free. Among all participants, the correlates of actual referrals were unemployment, less severe depression symptoms, poorer performance, treatment status, and wanting a referral. The sole correlate of actual referrals within the non-willing group was poorer performance, and no significant correlates existed within the willing group. The non-referrals were mostly (87.1%) because of postponed decisions.
CONCLUSIONS: The eVSRS-D cannot definitively diagnose major depression but may efficiently self-select a population with significant depression symptoms. The patients' willingness to engage the POS most strongly predicted the actual referrals. Oncologist reviews of screening reports may not result in further depression severity-specific referrals.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26087369     DOI: 10.1002/pon.3879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  4 in total

1.  Examination of a distress screening intervention for rural cancer survivors reveals low uptake of psychosocial referrals.

Authors:  Pam Baker DeGuzman; David L Vogel; Bethany Horton; Veronica Bernacchi; C Allen Cupp; B J Ferrebee Ghamandi; Ivora D Hinton; Christi Sheffield; Mark J Jameson
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 2.  Psycho-oncology in Korea: past, present and future.

Authors:  Hyun Jeong Lee; Kwang-Min Lee; Dooyoung Jung; Eun-Jung Shim; Bong-Jin Hahm; Jong-Heun Kim
Journal:  Biopsychosoc Med       Date:  2017-05-01

3.  Screening for distress, related problems and perceived need for psycho-oncological support in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  V Kunz; G Wichmann; A Lehmann-Laue; A Mehnert-Theuerkauf; A Dietz; S Wiegand
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Doctor's recommendations for psychosocial care: Frequency and predictors of recommendations and referrals.

Authors:  Jochen Ernst; Hermann Faller; Uwe Koch; Elmar Brähler; Martin Härter; Holger Schulz; Joachim Weis; Norbert Köhler; Andreas Hinz; Anja Mehnert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.