Literature DB >> 26087148

Sponge erosion under acidification and warming scenarios: differential impacts on living and dead coral.

Amber D Stubler1, Bradley T Furman1, Bradley J Peterson1.   

Abstract

Ocean acidification will disproportionately impact the growth of calcifying organisms in coral reef ecosystems. Simultaneously, sponge bioerosion rates have been shown to increase as seawater pH decreases. We conducted a 20-week experiment that included a 4-week acclimation period with a high number of replicate tanks and a fully orthogonal design with two levels of temperature (ambient and +1 °C), three levels of pH (8.1, 7.8, and 7.6), and two levels of boring sponge (Cliona varians, present and absent) to account for differences in sponge attachment and carbonate change for both living and dead coral substrate (Porites furcata). Net coral calcification, net dissolution/bioerosion, coral and sponge survival, sponge attachment, and sponge symbiont health were evaluated. Additionally, we used the empirical data from the experiment to develop a stochastic simulation of carbonate change for small coral clusters (i.e., simulated reefs). Our findings suggest differential impacts of temperature, pH and sponge presence for living and dead corals. Net coral calcification (mg CaCO3  cm(-2)  day(-1) ) was significantly reduced in treatments with increased temperature (+1 °C) and when sponges were present; acidification had no significant effect on coral calcification. Net dissolution of dead coral was primarily driven by pH, regardless of sponge presence or seawater temperature. A reevaluation of the current paradigm of coral carbonate change under future acidification and warming scenarios should include ecologically relevant timescales, species interactions, and community organization to more accurately predict ecosystem-level response to future conditions.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cliona; Porites; boring sponge; climate change; coral reef ecosystems; ocean acidification; simulation model; sponge bioerosion

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26087148     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  6 in total

1.  Bleaching and mortality of a photosymbiotic bioeroding sponge under future carbon dioxide emission scenarios.

Authors:  James K H Fang; Christine H L Schönberg; Matheus A Mello-Athayde; Michelle Achlatis; Ove Hoegh-Guldberg; Sophie Dove
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Tropical dead zones and mass mortalities on coral reefs.

Authors:  Andrew H Altieri; Seamus B Harrison; Janina Seemann; Rachel Collin; Robert J Diaz; Nancy Knowlton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sponge bioerosion on changing reefs: ocean warming poses physiological constraints to the success of a photosymbiotic excavating sponge.

Authors:  Michelle Achlatis; Rene M van der Zande; Christine H L Schönberg; James K H Fang; Ove Hoegh-Guldberg; Sophie Dove
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The response of a boreal deep-sea sponge holobiont to acute thermal stress.

Authors:  R Strand; S Whalan; N S Webster; T Kutti; J K H Fang; H M Luter; R J Bannister
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The bioeroding sponge Cliona orientalis will not tolerate future projected ocean warming.

Authors:  Blake D Ramsby; Mia O Hoogenboom; Hillary A Smith; Steve Whalan; Nicole S Webster
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A decadal analysis of bioeroding sponge cover on the inshore Great Barrier Reef.

Authors:  Blake D Ramsby; Mia O Hoogenboom; Steve Whalan; Nicole S Webster; Angus Thompson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.