Literature DB >> 26086281

Best position and depth of anaesthesia for laryngeal mask airway removal in children: A randomised controlled trial.

George Thomas-Kattappurathu1, Ananth Kasisomayajula, Judith Short.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a wide variation in clinical practice amongst clinicians in the process of removal of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in children. Some of the airway complications during recovery are associated with the position of the child as well as the depth of anaesthesia and are potentially avoidable.
OBJECTIVES: We wished to determine whether removal of the LMA in the lateral position reduces the incidence of airway complications, either in a deep plane of anaesthesia or awake.
DESIGN: A randomised trial.
SETTING: A tertiary children's hospital. PATIENTS: The study population comprised 216 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 to 2 patients aged 1 to 16 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia using an LMA. Exclusion criteria were children less than 1 year old, ASA 3 or above, presence of congenital heart disease or gastro-oesophageal reflux, anticipated difficult airway and patients undergoing airway or dental surgery. INTERVENTION: We randomly allocated 212 children into one of four groups for LMA removal, deeply anaesthetised or awake in either the lateral or supine position. Various airway complications were recorded after removal of the LMA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the number of patients experiencing one or more complication in each group. We also devised a novel 'Clinical Importance' score on the basis of the clinical relevance of airway complications.
RESULTS: There were significant differences among groups (P = 0.001); the fewest complications occurred when the LMA was removed in a deep plane of anaesthesia in the lateral position. There was a significant difference among groups in the 'Clinical Importance' scores (P < 0.001); the greatest risk occurred when the LMA was removed in deeply anaesthetised supine patients.
CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that lateral positioning of children for removal of the LMA provides the safest conditions if the LMA is to be removed at a deep plane of anaesthesia. Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust Study number CA08014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26086281     DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0265-0215            Impact factor:   4.330


  4 in total

1.  Complications associated with removal of airway devices under deep anesthesia in children: an analysis of the Wake Up Safe database.

Authors:  Lisa Vitale; Briana Rodriguez; Anne Baetzel; Robert Christensen; Bishr Haydar
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.376

2.  Deep vs. Awake Extubation and LMA Removal in Terms of Airway Complications in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Anesthesia: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chang-Hoon Koo; Sun Young Lee; Seung Hyun Chung; Jung-Hee Ryu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Effectiveness and Safety of Extubation before Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade versus Traditional Technique in Providing Smooth Extubation.

Authors:  Karthik C Babu; Sunil Rajan; Sai V K Sandhya; Renjima Raj; Jerry Paul; Lakshmi Kumar
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2021-08-30

Review 4.  Early versus late removal of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Preethy J Mathew; Joseph L Mathew
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.