Melanie Fieler1, Christoph Eich, Karin Becke, Gregor Badelt, Klaus Leimkühler, Leila Messroghli, Dietmar Boethig, Robert Sümpelmann. 1. From the Clinic for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hanover Medical School (MF, RS), Department of Anaesthesia, Paediatric Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Auf der Bult Children[Combining Acute Accent]s Hospital, Hanover (CE), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Cnopf[Combining Acute Accent]sche Kinderklinik/Klinik Hallerwiese, Nuremberg (KB), Department of Anaesthesiology and Paediatric Anaesthesiology, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg/Klinik St. Hedwig, Regensburg (GB), Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Protestant Hospital Bielefeld, Bielefeld (KL), Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive-Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main (LM), and Clinic for Cardiac, Thoracic, Transplant and Vascular Surgery, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany (DB).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Due to possible serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs), the use of metamizole for postoperative pain therapy in children is a subject of debate. Safety studies with large sample sizes have not been published as yet. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of metamizole in children aged up to 6 years undergoing surgery with a particular focus on serious ADRs such as haemodynamic, anaphylactic or respiratory reactions and agranulocytosis. DESIGN: A multicentre, prospective, noninterventional, observational postauthorisation safety study (PASS). SETTING: The study was conducted in six different paediatric centres from September 2013 to September 2014. PATIENTS: One thousand one hundred and seventy-seven children aged up to six years (American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status class I to III) receiving a single dose of metamizole for postoperative pain therapy were enrolled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, main and secondary diagnoses, surgical procedures performed, metamizole dose, haemodynamic data, use of other analgesics and regional blocks, results of pain measurement (Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale, ChIPPS) and ADR incidence were documented using a standardised case report form. RESULTS: Of the 1177 children observed at six paediatric centres, 1145 were included for analysis [age 35.8 ± 18.1 (0.1 to 72) months]. The mean metamizole dose was 17.3 ± 2.9 (8.3 to 29.4) mg kg(-1). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) remained stable during metamizole infusion [baseline 55.7 ± 1.3 (25 to 98) and after infusion 56.6 ± 11.3 (25 to 99) mmHg; P < 0.01]. Pruritus, swelling and exanthema were observed in one patient each (total 0.3%). No respiratory adverse events directly related to the metamizole administration and no clinical signs of agranulocytosis were reported. All data are mean ± SD (range). CONCLUSION: Single intravenous doses of metamizole used for the prevention or treatment of postoperative pain were well tolerated in more than 1000 children aged up to 6 years. The probability of serious ADRs (haemodynamic, anaphylactic or respiratory reactions) is lower than 0.3%. The sample size and follow-up was not sufficient to detect episodes of agranulocytosis.
BACKGROUND: Due to possible serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs), the use of metamizole for postoperative pain therapy in children is a subject of debate. Safety studies with large sample sizes have not been published as yet. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of metamizole in children aged up to 6 years undergoing surgery with a particular focus on serious ADRs such as haemodynamic, anaphylactic or respiratory reactions and agranulocytosis. DESIGN: A multicentre, prospective, noninterventional, observational postauthorisation safety study (PASS). SETTING: The study was conducted in six different paediatric centres from September 2013 to September 2014. PATIENTS: One thousand one hundred and seventy-seven children aged up to six years (American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status class I to III) receiving a single dose of metamizole for postoperative pain therapy were enrolled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, main and secondary diagnoses, surgical procedures performed, metamizole dose, haemodynamic data, use of other analgesics and regional blocks, results of pain measurement (Children and InfantsPostoperative Pain Scale, ChIPPS) and ADR incidence were documented using a standardised case report form. RESULTS: Of the 1177 children observed at six paediatric centres, 1145 were included for analysis [age 35.8 ± 18.1 (0.1 to 72) months]. The mean metamizole dose was 17.3 ± 2.9 (8.3 to 29.4) mg kg(-1). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) remained stable during metamizole infusion [baseline 55.7 ± 1.3 (25 to 98) and after infusion 56.6 ± 11.3 (25 to 99) mmHg; P < 0.01]. Pruritus, swelling and exanthema were observed in one patient each (total 0.3%). No respiratory adverse events directly related to the metamizole administration and no clinical signs of agranulocytosis were reported. All data are mean ± SD (range). CONCLUSION: Single intravenous doses of metamizole used for the prevention or treatment of postoperative pain were well tolerated in more than 1000 children aged up to 6 years. The probability of serious ADRs (haemodynamic, anaphylactic or respiratory reactions) is lower than 0.3%. The sample size and follow-up was not sufficient to detect episodes of agranulocytosis.
Authors: Victoria C Ziesenitz; Frédérique Rodieux; Andrew Atkinson; Carole Borter; Julia A Bielicki; Manuel Haschke; Urs Duthaler; Fabio Bachmann; Thomas O Erb; Nicolas Gürtler; Stefan Holland-Cunz; Johannes N van den Anker; Verena Gotta; Marc Pfister Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: W Stromer; B Messerer; R Crevenna; S H Hemberger; B Jauk; R Schwarz; W Streif; K Thom; B Wagner; K Zwiauer; R Likar Journal: Schmerz Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 1.107
Authors: Dirceu Solé; Maria Anita Costa Spindola; Marcelo Vivolo Aun; Liana Maria Tôrres de Araújo Azi; Luiz Antonio Guerra Bernd; Daniela Bianchi Garcia; Albertina Varandas Capelo; Débora de Oliveira Cumino; Alex Eustáquio Lacerda; Luciana Cavalcanti Lima; Edelton Flávio Morato; Rogean Rodrigues Nunes; Norma de Paula Motta Rubini; Jane da Silva; Maria Angela Tardelli; Alexandra Sayuri Watanabe; Erick Freitas Curi; Flavio Sano Journal: Braz J Anesthesiol Date: 2020-11-09
Authors: Maira Isis S Stangler; João Pedro Neves Lubianca; Jaqueline Neves Lubianca; José Faibes Lubianca Neto Journal: Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2021-01-02