Literature DB >> 26085739

Optical Imaging: Future Tool in Detection of Pre-cancerous and Cancerous Lesions of Cervix and Its Comparison to Colposcopy.

Kiran Pandey1, Ajay Bhagoliwal2, Sonal Jain1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the diagnostic potential of optical imaging and its comparison with colposcopy, in detecting early cervical dysplasia.
METHODS: The study was conducted on 200 patients attending the outdoor of UISE maternity hospital with symptoms suspicious of cervical lesions. All patients were subjected to colposcopy, followed by histo-pathological examination. Out of all HPE, 18 samples each from normal and dysplastic histology were sent to IIT Physics lab, Kanpur for optical imaging. Statistical analysis was done using sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. Chi square test was applied to calculate p value.
RESULTS: In optical imaging, depolarization images had shown significant changes in the epithelium region of the dysplastic tissue as compared to normal one. It is found that the mean value of depolarization power for normal cervix tissues is less than 0.32, while for dysplastic tissues it is greater than 0.32.
CONCLUSION: Optical imaging is fast, non-invasive tool with high sensitivity and specificity, comparable to colposcopy (sensitivity 88.9 vs 100 %, specificity 83.3 vs 86.6 %) and thus is useful in both for screening and diagnosis of cervical dysplasia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer cervix; Colposcopy; Depolarization power; Optical imaging

Year:  2014        PMID: 26085739      PMCID: PMC4464571          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-014-0511-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  6 in total

1.  Value of colposcopy in the early diagnosis of cervical cancer in patients with abnormal pap smears at Shahid Sadoughi hospital, Yazd.

Authors:  Mojgan Karimi Zarchi; Fariba Binesh; Zohre Kazemi; Soraya Teimoori; Hamid Reza Soltani; Zohre Chiti
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2011

2.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2011: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Durado Brooks; Debbie Saslow; Mona Shah; Otis W Brawley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Screening for cervical cancer by direct inspection.

Authors:  V Singh; A Sehgal; U K Luthra
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-29

Review 4.  Optical imaging for cervical cancer detection: solutions for a continuing global problem.

Authors:  Nadhi Thekkek; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Pooled analysis of the accuracy of five cervical cancer screening tests assessed in eleven studies in Africa and India.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan; Richard Muwonge; Namory Keita; Amadou Dolo; Charles Gombe Mbalawa; Hassan Nouhou; Boblewende Sakande; Ramani Wesley; Thara Somanathan; Anjali Sharma; Surendra Shastri; Parthasarathy Basu
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  LEEP Verses Cryotherapy in CIN.

Authors:  Abha Singh; Bhavna Arthur; Vivek Agarwal
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2011-09-22
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence microscopy accurately classifies precancerous and cancerous human cervix free of labeling.

Authors:  Xianxu Zeng; Xiaoan Zhang; Canyu Li; Xiaofang Wang; Jason Jerwick; Tao Xu; Yuan Ning; Yihong Wang; Linlin Zhang; Zhan Zhang; Yutao Ma; Chao Zhou
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 11.556

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.