| Literature DB >> 26085081 |
Zongrui Wang1, Huanli Dong1,2, Tao Li3, Rune Hviid3, Ye Zou1, Zhongming Wei3, Xiaolong Fu1, Erjing Wang1, Yonggang Zhen1, Kasper Nørgaard3, Bo W Laursen3, Wenping Hu1,4.
Abstract
Molecular electronics describes a field that seeks to implement electronic components made of molecular building blocks. To date, few studies have used conjugated polymers in molecular junctions despite the fact that they potentially transport charge more efficiently than the extensively investigated small-molecular systems. Here we report a novel type of molecular tunnelling junction exploring the use of conjugated polymers, which are self-assembled into ultrathin films in a distinguishable 'planar' manner from the traditional vertically oriented small-molecule monolayers. Electrical measurements on the junctions reveal molecular-specific characteristics of the polymeric molecules in comparison with less conjugated small molecules. More significantly, we decorate redox-active functionality into polymeric backbones, demonstrating a key role of redox centre in the modulation of charge transport behaviour via energy level engineering and external stimuli, and implying the potential of employing tailor-made polymeric components as alternatives to small molecules for future molecular-scale electronics.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26085081 PMCID: PMC4557373 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1rGO test bed with self-assembled CPs on Au bottom electrodes.
(a) Chemical structures of PPE and TTF–PPE. (b) Cyclic voltammograms of PPEs and TTF–PPEs dissolved in tetrahydrofuran solution. (c) Optical images depicting the process of device fabrication using thin Au films as masks to remove the unwanted parts of rGO films. (d) Schematic view of rGO top-contact test bed for molecular tunneling junctions. The blue arrow in (d) indicates charge transfer between adjacent junctions via graphene top contact. (e) Schematic view of self-assembled small molecules and long CPs inside the junctions. The blue arrows in (e) indicate charge transfer by direct tunnelling across the molecular barriers.
Figure 2XPS and UPS characterization of self-assembled CP films.
S 2p XPS spectra for self-assembled films of (a) PPEs and (d) TTF–PPEs on Au substrate. (b,e) The measured UPS spectra of the SEC region of PPE/Au and TTF–PPE/Au. (c,f) The HOMO region of PPE/Au and TTF–PPE/Au. (g–j) The energy level diagrams of Au/PPE, Au/TTF–PPE, Au/C12 and Au/OPE3, respectively.
Figure 3I–V characteristics of molecular tunnelling junctions.
(a) Representative I–V curves of rGO-only junctions and junctions based on PPE and TTF–PPE ultrathin films. (b–e) Fowler–Nordheim plots for I–V traces of junctions based on (b) C12, (c) OPE3, (d) PPE and (e) TTF–PPE. Two distinct regimes (I and II) are clearly observable in c, d and e with a minimum at Vtrans. Insets of d and e show log–log plot of representative I–V traces for PPE and TTF–PPE junctions.
Figure 4Characterization of redox changes within TTF–PPEs.
Ultraviolet–vis absorption spectra changes (in anhydrous THF, 298 K) on successively adding oxidant Fe(ClO4)3·6H2O in solutions of (a) PPE and (b) TTF–PPE. The initial state TTF–PPE (black) and final dication state TTF2+–PPE (red) are indicated in bold. (b) Inset, the change of ESR spectrum with the addition of oxidant and blue curve refers to the radical state TTF·+–PPE. (c) and (d) C 1s XPS spectra for self-assembled films of PPE and TTF–PPE before and after oxidant treatment, respectively. A clear change in C 1s spectra for TTF–PPE films can be observed, which is absent for that of PPE.
Figure 5Modulation of TTF–PPE junctions via chemical oxidation.
I–V characteristics of (a) PPE and (b) TTF–PPE junctions before/as-prepared (black square) and after treated with excess iron perchlorate hexahydrate (red circle). The plots are generated from average values obtained from least 20 junctions of the same batch. Insets of a and b show statistics on sheet resistance of the PPE and TTF–PPE junctions, respectively. (c) Fowler–Nordheim plot for I–V traces of TTF2+–PPE junctions. Inset shows the energy level diagram of TTF2+–PPE/Au.
Summary of orbital energy levels and transition voltage of PPE, TTF–PPE, TTF2+–PPE, C12 and OPE3.
| C12 | ∼7 (ref. | −6.30 | — | 2.16 | — | — | — | — |
| OPE3 | 3.37 (ref. | −5.48 | −2.11 | 1.56 | 1.81 | 0.55±0.1 | −5.31 (ref. | −1.77 (ref. |
| PPE | 2.59 | −5.24 | −2.65 | 1.08 | 1.51 | 0.6±0.1 | −6.30 | −3.71 |
| TTF–PPE | 2.30 | −5.14 | −2.84 | 0.76 | 1.54 | 0.28±0.08 | −4.84 | −2.54 |
| TTF2+–PPE | 2.51 | −5.68 | −3.17 | 1.04 | 1.47 | 0.37±0.08 | — | — |
Calc., density functional theory (DFT) calculation; Exp., experiment; HOMO, highest occupied molecular orbital; LUMO, lowest unoccupied molecular orbital; PPE, thioacetyl-end-functionalized poly(p-phenylene ethynylene); TTF, tetrathiafulvalene; UPS, ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy.
*Eg refers to the optical energy gap.
†EHOMO is calculated from the UPS spectra of the self-assembled monolayers or ultrathin films on Au surface.
‡ELUMO=EHOMO+Eg.
§The energy barrier between EHOMO,UPS and EF.
||The energy barrier between ELUMO,UPS and EF.
¶EHOMO is calculated from CVs and defined as −(eEoxonset+4.4 eV). Here Eoxonset represents the onset potential for the oxidation.
Figure 6Modulation of TTF–PPE junctions via electrochemical method.
(a) Ultraviolet–vis absorption spectra (in anhydrous THF, 0.1 M Bu4NPF6, 298 K) of TTF–PPEs (blue), after electrochemical oxidation at +2 V (versus Ag/AgCl) for 10 min (red) and subsequent electrochemical reduction at −0.2 V (versus Ag/AgCl) for 30 min (cyan). A cycling of oxidation–reduction process is achieved. Repeated electrochemical oxidation and reduction process is realized in the same way: at +2 V (versus Ag/AgCl) for 10 min (yellow) for oxidation and at −0.2 V (versus Ag/AgCl) for 30 min (violet) for reduction, respectively. (b) Typical I–V characteristics of TTF–PPE junction under larger applied bias sweeps. Hysteretic conductance switching following an ‘oxidation-current decrease-reduction-current recovery' trend indicates an oxidation–reduction process within the device. Inset, no hysteresis loops were observed in control experiments with rGO-only, C12 and PPE junctions.