| Literature DB >> 26084991 |
Ting Zhou1, Jianhua Zhan1, Shaodong Hong1, Zhihuang Hu1, Wenfeng Fang1, Tao Qin1, Yuxiang Ma1, Yunpeng Yang1, Xiaobo He2, Yuanyuan Zhao1, Yan Huang1, Hongyun Zhao1, Li Zhang1.
Abstract
Recent studies have indicated that the C-reactive protein/ albumin (CRP/Alb) ratio is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We examined the prognostic value of this ratio in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). In this retrospective study, a total of 367 eligible SCLC patients were analyzed and the correlation between the pretreatment CRP/Alb ratio and overall survival (OS) was investigated. The optimal cutoff level of CRP/Alb ratio was at 0.441. A low and high CRP/Alb ratio was assigned to 65.1% and 34.9% of patients, respectively. The median OS of patients with a high CRP/Alb ratio was worse than those in the low group (13.70 vs 18.90 months HR, 1.34; p = 0.005). Disease stage (p < 0.001), performance status (PS) (p < 0.001) and pretreatment LDH (p < 0.001) were also significant predictors of OS. Multivariate analyses showed that the CRP/Alb ratio is an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.025). This study demonstrated that the CRP/Alb ratio could independently predict OS in patients with SCLC, and had comparable prognostic value to other known prognostic markers. Therefore, the CRP/Alb ratio could have prognostic value and be a measurable biomarker in patients with SCLC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26084991 PMCID: PMC4471724 DOI: 10.1038/srep10481
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Basic characteristics of all patients and univariate survival analysis.
| 59 (23-82)a | 0.049 | |||
| Male | 316 | 86.1 | 16.7(14.75-18.65) | 0.077 |
| Female | 51 | 13.9 | 18.7(11.61-27.39) | |
| Smoker | 302 | 82.3 | 16.8(14.69-18.91) | 0.917 |
| Never-smoker | 65 | 17.7 | 16.0(12.61-19.33) | |
| Limited stage | 180 | 49.0 | 22.1(17.10-27.10) | <0.001 |
| Extensive stage | 187 | 51.0 | 14.2(11.61-16.72) | |
| 0 | 195 | 53.1 | 17.0(15.01-19.06) | <0.001 |
| 1 | 142 | 38.7 | 18.7(16.14-21.20) | |
| 2 | 30 | 8.2 | 9.3(7.94-10.73) | |
| ≥0.441 | 128 | 34.9 | 13.7(11.86-15.61) | 0.005 |
| <0.441 | 239 | 65.1 | 18.9(16.93-20.87) | |
| | 220 | 59.9 | 19.2(17.52-20.89) | <0.001 |
| Abnormally elevated | 147 | 40.1 | 13.3(11.06-15.61) | |
| Etoposide-based | 315 | 85.8 | 17.2(15.34-19.13) | 0.685 |
| Others | 52 | 14.2 | 13.2(7.31-19.16) | |
| 0.361 | ||||
| Yes | 81 | 22.1 | 16.2(12.85-19.55) | |
| No | 286 | 77.9 | 17.0(15.08-18.99) | |
Note: aMedian (range); bLog-rank test
Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; CI, confidence interval; PS, performance status; CRP/Alb, C-reactive protein/albumin; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase
Figure 1Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) independent of cutoff point for CRP/Alb ratio in patients with small-cell lung cancer. The vertical line designates the optimal cutoff point with the most significant (log-rank test) split. The plots were generated using Cutoff Finder.
Clinicopathological characteristics of patients stratified by CRP/Alb ratio.
| 0.659 | |||
| 108 (66.7) | 54 (33.3) | ||
| 131 (63.9) | 74 (36.1) | ||
| 0.637 | |||
| 204 (64.6) | 112 (35.4) | ||
| 35 (68.6) | 16 (31.4) | ||
| 0.669 | |||
| 195 (64.6) | 107 (35.4) | ||
| 44 (67.7) | 21 (32.3) | ||
| 0.734 | |||
| 130 (66.7) | 65 (33.3) | ||
| 91 (64.1) | 51 (35.9) | ||
| 18 (60.0) | 12 (40.0) | ||
| 0.584 | |||
| 120 (66.7) | 60 (33.3) | ||
| 119 (63.6) | 68 (36.4) | ||
| 0.010 | |||
| 155 (70.5) | 65 (29.5) | ||
| 84 (57.1) | 63 (42.9) | ||
| 0.432 | |||
| 208 (66.0) | 107 (34.0) | ||
| 31 (59.6) | 21 (40.4) | ||
| 0.793 | |||
| 185 (64.7) | 101 (35.3) | ||
| 54 (66.7) | 27 (33.3) |
Abbreviations: PS, performance status; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; CRP/Alb, C-reactive protein / albumin.
Figure 2The prognostic value of CRP/Alb ratio on overall survival curves in patients with limited or extensive stage disease. A. Comparison of OS on patients with high CRP/Alb ratio vs low CRP/Alb ratio. B. Comparison of OS on patients in limited stage with high CRP/Alb vs low CRP/Alb ratio. C. Comparison of OS on patients in extensive stage with high CRP/Alb vs low CRP/Alb ratio
Figure 3Overall survival curves comparing patients with A. limited disease vs extensive disease; B. good vs bad PS; C. high LDH vs low LDH
Results from Cox Regression Model (Adjusted for Age, Sex, Disease stage, PS and the CRP/Alb ratio).
| 1.26 | 0.98 | 1.62 | 0.073 | |
| 0 | 1.00 | - | - | - |
| 1 | 0.94 | 0.73 | 1.22 | 0.654 |
| 2 | 3.13 | 1.94 | 5.05 | <0.001 |
| ≥0.442 | 1.00 | - | - | - |
| <0.442 | 1.34 | 1.04 | 1.73 | 0.025 |
| Limited stage | 1.00 | - | - | - |
| Extensive stage | 2.13 | 1.65 | 2.76 | <0.001 |
| Normal range | 1.00 | - | - | - |
| Abnormally elevated | 1.41 | 1.10 | 1.83 | 0.008 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit; PS, performance status; CRP/Alb, C-reactive protein / albumin; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.Ratio of C-Reactive Protein/Albumin is An Inflammatory Prognostic Score for Predicting Overall Survival of Patients with Small-cell Lung Cancer