Literature DB >> 26084909

Spatial receptive fields in the retina and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of mice lacking rods and cones.

Christopher A Procyk1, Cyril G Eleftheriou1, Riccardo Storchi1, Annette E Allen1, Nina Milosavljevic1, Timothy M Brown1, Robert J Lucas2.   

Abstract

In advanced retinal degeneration loss of rods and cones leaves melanopsin-expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) as the only source of visual information. ipRGCs drive non-image-forming responses (e.g., circadian photoentrainment) under such conditions but, despite projecting to the primary visual thalamus [dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN)], do not support form vision. We wished to determine what precludes ipRGCs supporting spatial discrimination after photoreceptor loss, using a mouse model (rd/rd cl) lacking rods and cones. Using multielectrode arrays, we found that both RGCs and neurons in the dLGN of this animal have clearly delineated spatial receptive fields. In the retina, they are typically symmetrical, lack inhibitory surrounds, and have diameters in the range of 10-30° of visual space. Receptive fields in the dLGN were larger (diameters typically 30-70°) but matched the retinotopic map of the mouse dLGN. Injections of a neuroanatomical tracer (cholera toxin β-subunit) into the dLGN confirmed that retinotopic order of ganglion cell projections to the dLGN and thalamic projections to the cortex is at least superficially intact in rd/rd cl mice. However, as previously reported for deafferented ipRGCs, onset and offset of light responses have long latencies in the rd/rd cl retina and dLGN. Accordingly, dLGN neurons failed to track dynamic changes in light intensity in this animal. Our data reveal that ipRGCs can convey spatial information in advanced retinal degeneration and identify their poor temporal fidelity as the major limitation in their ability to provide information about spatial patterns under natural viewing conditions.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus; melanopsin; retinal degeneration; spatial receptive fields

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26084909      PMCID: PMC4725120          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00368.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  35 in total

1.  Calcium imaging reveals a network of intrinsically light-sensitive inner-retinal neurons.

Authors:  Sumathi Sekaran; Russell G Foster; Robert J Lucas; Mark W Hankins
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Developmental remodeling of the retinogeniculate synapse.

Authors:  C Chen; W G Regehr
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Vision triggers an experience-dependent sensitive period at the retinogeniculate synapse.

Authors:  Bryan M Hooks; Chinfei Chen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Identifying the photoreceptive inputs to the mammalian circadian system using transgenic and retinally degenerate mice.

Authors:  R J Lucas; M S Freedman; D Lupi; M Munoz; Z K David-Gray; R G Foster
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Form and function of the M4 cell, an intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell type contributing to geniculocortical vision.

Authors:  Maureen E Estevez; P Michelle Fogerson; Marissa C Ilardi; Bart G Borghuis; Eric Chan; Shijun Weng; Olivia N Auferkorte; Jonathan B Demb; David M Berson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Tracer coupling of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells to amacrine cells in the mouse retina.

Authors:  Luis Pérez de Sevilla Müller; Michael Tri H Do; King-Wai Yau; Shigang He; William H Baldridge
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Block of gap junctions eliminates aberrant activity and restores light responses during retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Abduqodir H Toychiev; Elena Ivanova; Christopher W Yee; Botir T Sagdullaev
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Melanopsin-based brightness discrimination in mice and humans.

Authors:  Timothy M Brown; Sei-Ichi Tsujimura; Annette E Allen; Jonathan Wynne; Robert Bedford; Graham Vickery; Anthony Vugler; Robert J Lucas
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Nonuniform distribution and spectral tuning of photosensitive retinal ganglion cells of the mouse retina.

Authors:  Steven Hughes; Thomas S Watson; Russell G Foster; Stuart N Peirson; Mark W Hankins
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Short-wavelength light sensitivity of circadian, pupillary, and visual awareness in humans lacking an outer retina.

Authors:  Farhan H Zaidi; Joseph T Hull; Stuart N Peirson; Katharina Wulff; Daniel Aeschbach; Joshua J Gooley; George C Brainard; Kevin Gregory-Evans; Joseph F Rizzo; Charles A Czeisler; Russell G Foster; Merrick J Moseley; Steven W Lockley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  14 in total

1.  Visual responses in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus at early stages of retinal degeneration in rd1 PDE6β mice.

Authors:  Christopher A Procyk; Annette E Allen; Franck P Martial; Robert J Lucas
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Melanopsin and the Intrinsically Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells: Biophysics to Behavior.

Authors:  Michael Tri H Do
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Acepromazine and Chlorpromazine as Pharmaceutical-grade Alternatives to Chlorprothixene for Pupillary Light Reflex Imaging in Mice.

Authors:  Samantha S Eckley; Jason S Villano; Nora S Kuo; Kwoon Y Wong
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Label-free photoacoustic computed tomography of mouse cortical responses to retinal photostimulation using a pair-wise correlation map.

Authors:  Kai-Wei Chang; Yunhao Zhu; Xueding Wang; Kwoon Y Wong; Guan Xu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 5.  Crosstalk: The diversity of melanopsin ganglion cell types has begun to challenge the canonical divide between image-forming and non-image-forming vision.

Authors:  Katelyn B Sondereker; Maureen E Stabio; Jordan M Renna
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.028

Review 6.  Mechanisms of phosphenes in irradiated patients.

Authors:  Thibaud Mathis; Stephane Vignot; Cecila Leal; Jean-Pierre Caujolle; Celia Maschi; Martine Mauget-Faÿsse; Laurent Kodjikian; Stéphanie Baillif; Joel Herault; Juliette Thariat
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-28

7.  Melanopsin Contributions to the Representation of Images in the Early Visual System.

Authors:  Annette E Allen; Riccardo Storchi; Franck P Martial; Robert A Bedford; Robert J Lucas
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Visual input to the mouse lateral posterior and posterior thalamic nuclei: photoreceptive origins and retinotopic order.

Authors:  Annette E Allen; Christopher A Procyk; Michael Howarth; Lauren Walmsley; Timothy M Brown
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  Optogenetic Modulation of Intracellular Signalling and Transcription: Focus on Neuronal Plasticity.

Authors:  Cyril Eleftheriou; Fabrizia Cesca; Luca Maragliano; Fabio Benfenati; Jose Fernando Maya-Vetencourt
Journal:  J Exp Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-01

10.  Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell-driven pupil responses in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jakaria Mostafa; Jason Porter; Hope M Queener; Lisa A Ostrin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.