Nathalie Oexle1, Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross2, Mario Müller2, Stephanie Rodgers2, Wulf Rössler2,3, Nicolas Rüsch4. 1. Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm and BKH Günzburg, Parkstrasse 11, 89073, Ulm, Germany. nathalie.oexle@googlemail.com. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Zurich University Hospital of Psychiatry, Zurich, Switzerland. 3. Laboratory of Neuroscience (LIM27), Institute of Psychiatry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 4. Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm and BKH Günzburg, Parkstrasse 11, 89073, Ulm, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Most people with mental health problems do not use mental health services, resulting in poor psychiatric outcomes and greater illness burden. Although perceiving the need for mental health care was identified to be a key factor for service use, factors that explain differences in perceived need for mental health care are incompletely understood. The present paper investigates the role of illness representations in predicting perceived need for mental health care. METHODS: In a community sample of 202 persons currently distressed by symptoms related to mental illness, illness representations were assessed using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire and perceived need for mental health care was measured by the Self-Appraisal of Illness Questionnaire. Multiple linear regression models were used to determine the association between a person's illness representations and the level of perceived need for mental health care. RESULTS: Two illness representations were positively associated with perceived need for mental health care: the belief that treatment could improve the current mental health problem and the attribution of experienced symptoms to a mental health problem. Increased perceived need for care was related to current mental health service use. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that aim to increase mental health service use could focus on people's attitudes toward mental health treatment and enable people to recognize symptoms as a mental illness.
PURPOSE: Most people with mental health problems do not use mental health services, resulting in poor psychiatric outcomes and greater illness burden. Although perceiving the need for mental health care was identified to be a key factor for service use, factors that explain differences in perceived need for mental health care are incompletely understood. The present paper investigates the role of illness representations in predicting perceived need for mental health care. METHODS: In a community sample of 202 persons currently distressed by symptoms related to mental illness, illness representations were assessed using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire and perceived need for mental health care was measured by the Self-Appraisal of Illness Questionnaire. Multiple linear regression models were used to determine the association between a person's illness representations and the level of perceived need for mental health care. RESULTS: Two illness representations were positively associated with perceived need for mental health care: the belief that treatment could improve the current mental health problem and the attribution of experienced symptoms to a mental health problem. Increased perceived need for care was related to current mental health service use. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that aim to increase mental health service use could focus on people's attitudes toward mental health treatment and enable people to recognize symptoms as a mental illness.
Entities:
Keywords:
Help-seeking; Illness representations; Mental illness; Perceived need; Self-regulatory model
Authors: Koen Demyttenaere; Ronny Bruffaerts; Jose Posada-Villa; Isabelle Gasquet; Viviane Kovess; Jean Pierre Lepine; Matthias C Angermeyer; Sebastian Bernert; Giovanni de Girolamo; Pierluigi Morosini; Gabriella Polidori; Takehiko Kikkawa; Norito Kawakami; Yutaka Ono; Tadashi Takeshima; Hidenori Uda; Elie G Karam; John A Fayyad; Aimee N Karam; Zeina N Mneimneh; Maria Elena Medina-Mora; Guilherme Borges; Carmen Lara; Ron de Graaf; Johan Ormel; Oye Gureje; Yucun Shen; Yueqin Huang; Mingyuan Zhang; Jordi Alonso; Josep Maria Haro; Gemma Vilagut; Evelyn J Bromet; Semyon Gluzman; Charles Webb; Ronald C Kessler; Kathleen R Merikangas; James C Anthony; Michael R Von Korff; Philip S Wang; Traolach S Brugha; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Sing Lee; Steven Heeringa; Beth-Ellen Pennell; Alan M Zaslavsky; T Bedirhan Ustun; Somnath Chatterji Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-06-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Suzanne E Gerritsen; Athanasios Maras; Larissa S van Bodegom; Mathilde M Overbeek; Frank C Verhulst; Dieter Wolke; Rebecca Appleton; Angelo Bertani; Maria G Cataldo; Patrizia Conti; David Da Fonseca; Nikolina Davidović; Katarina Dodig-Ćurković; Cecilia Ferrari; Federico Fiori; Tomislav Franić; Charlotte Gatherer; Giovanni De Girolamo; Natalie Heaney; Gaëlle Hendrickx; Alfred Kolozsvari; Flavia Micol Levi; Kate Lievesley; Jason Madan; Ottaviano Martinelli; Mathilde Mastroianni; Virginie Maurice; Fiona McNicholas; Lesley O'Hara; Moli Paul; Diane Purper-Ouakil; Veronique de Roeck; Frédérick Russet; Melanie C Saam; Ilyas Sagar-Ouriaghli; Paramala J Santosh; Anne Sartor; Aurélie Schandrin; Ulrike M E Schulze; Giulia Signorini; Swaran P Singh; Jatinder Singh; Cathy Street; Priya Tah; Elena Tanase; Sabine Tremmery; Amanda Tuffrey; Helena Tuomainen; Therese A M J van Amelsvoort; Anna Wilson; Leanne Walker; Gwen C Dieleman Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 2.692