| Literature DB >> 26084051 |
Zhenkun Wu1, Liyi Li2, Ziyin Lin2, Bo Song2, Zhuo Li2, Kyoung-Sik Moon2, Ching-Ping Wong2, Shu-Lin Bai3.
Abstract
Aluminum electrolytic capacitors (AECs) are widely used for alternating current (ac) line-filtering. However, their bulky size is becoming more and more incompatible with the rapid development of portable electronics. Here we report a scalable process to fabricate miniaturized graphene-based ac line-filters on flexible substrates at room temperature. In this work, graphene oxide (GO) is reduced by patterned metal interdigits at room temperature and used directly as the electrode material. The as-fabricated device shows a phase angle of -75.4° at 120 Hz with a specific capacitance of 316 µF/cm(2) and a RC time constant of 0.35 ms. In addition, it retains 97.2% of the initial capacitance after 10000 charge/discharge cycles. These outstanding performance characteristics of our device demonstrate its promising to replace the conventional AECs for ac line filtering.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26084051 PMCID: PMC4470326 DOI: 10.1038/srep10983
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1a) Illustration of the fabrication process. I, photolithography process; II, GO reduction; III, washing and cleaning; IV, electrolyte infiltration. The inset represents the cross-section sketch of the metal interdigit. (b) Optical images of the device before (left) and after (right) rGO assembling and air-drying. Inset: the illustration of the substrate patterned with metal interdigit.
Figure 2a) Top-view and (b) side-view of a free-dried rGO aerogel on a metal interdigit finger.
Figure 3a) CV curves of the device at scan rates of 2, 5 and 8 V/s, respectively.(b) Stability performance measured with CD cycling at a current density of 1.3 mA/cm2. (c) Bode phase diagram of our device and AEC. (d) AC impedance spectrum of our device. The inset shows the high frequency region.
Figure 4(a) The variation of real and imaginary part of capacitance versus frequency.b) Capacitance versus frequency.
Comparison of electrochemical performance of ac line-filters using different electrode materials.
| this work | F | 75.4 | 0.35 | 1.9 | 0.32 |
| AEC | N | 84.8 | 0.11 | 0.46 | N/A |
| VG | N | 82 | ~ 0.2 | N/A | 0.0875 |
| Graphene/VACNT | N | 73.4 ~ 81.5 | 0.2 ~ 0.4 | 0.82 ~ 2.62 | 0.23 ~ 0.66 |
| rGO | F | 79.5 ~ 85 | 1.35 | 0.17 ~ 1.0 | 0.283 |
| LSG | F | <30 | N/A | 19 | N/A |
| OLC | F | N/A | N/A | 26 | N/A |
aF and N designate that the substrate can and cannot be flexible, respectively.