| Literature DB >> 26083366 |
Osamu Matsuda1, Masashi Hara2, Hiroyuki Tobita3, Kenichi Yazaki3, Toshinori Nakagawa4, Kuniyoshi Shimizu4, Akira Uemura5, Hajime Utsugi3.
Abstract
Regeneration of planted forests of Cryptomeria japonica (sugi) and Chamaecyparis obtuse (hinoki) is the pressing importance to the forest administration in Japan. Low seed germination rate of these species, however, has hampered low-cost production of their seedlings for reforestation. The primary cause of the low germinability has been attributed to highly frequent formation of anatomically unsound seeds, which are indistinguishable from sound germinable seeds by visible observation and other common criteria such as size and weight. To establish a method for sound seed selection in these species, hyperspectral imaging technique was used to identify a wavelength range where reflectance spectra differ clearly between sound and unsound seeds. In sound seeds of both species, reflectance in a narrow waveband centered at 1,730 nm, corresponding to a lipid absorption band in the short-wavelength infrared (SWIR) range, was greatly depressed relative to that in adjacent wavebands on either side. Such depression was absent or less prominent in unsound seeds. Based on these observations, a reflectance index SQI, abbreviated for seed quality index, was formulated using reflectance at three narrow SWIR wavebands so that it represents the extent of the depression. SQI calculated from seed area-averaged reflectance spectra and spatial distribution patterns of pixelwise SQI within each seed area were both proven as reliable criteria for sound seed selection. Enrichment of sound seeds was accompanied by an increase in germination rate of the seed lot. Thus, the methods described are readily applicable toward low-cost seedling production in combination with single seed sowing technology.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26083366 PMCID: PMC4470962 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Cryptomeria japonica and Chamaecyparis obtusa seed lots used in this study.
| Species | Germination Rate | Seed Group | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unsound | ||||||||
| Seed Lot | Initial (Highest) | Date Tested | This Study (Aug. 2014) | Sound | Shibudane | Others |
| |
|
| Ibaraki SA1 | 41% | Apr. 1996 | - | 37% | 40% | 23% | 100 |
| Ibaraki SA2 | 58% | Jul. 2006 | - | 76% | 23% | 1% | 100 | |
| Ibaraki SA3 | 62% | May 2012 | 43.9% | 66.7% | 32.8% | 0.5% | 180 | |
| Ibaraki SA4 | 47% | Jun. 2012 | - | 41% | 44% | 15% | 100 | |
| Ibaraki SC1 | 37% | Dec. 1998 | - | 51% | 33% | 16% | 100 | |
| Ibaraki SD | 24% | Dec. 2002 | - | 58% | 22% | 20% | 100 | |
| Kumamoto SG | 13% | May 1996 | - | 13% | 74% | 13% | 100 | |
| Kumamoto SH | 8% | Oct. 1997 | - | 9% | 85% | 6% | 100 | |
| Nagano SI | 28% | Aug. 2000 | - | 32% | 59% | 9% | 100 | |
| Shimane SJ | 18.3% | Feb. 2014 | 14.4% | 17.2% | 50.0% | 32.8% | 180 | |
|
| Ibaraki HB1 | 41% | Jun. 2012 | 17.2% | 32.8% | 48.3% | 18.9% | 180 |
| Ibaraki HB2 | 77% | Jun. 2012 | - | 72% | 24% | 4% | 100 | |
| Ibaraki HB3 | 69% | Jul. 2012 | - | 69% | 23% | 8% | 100 | |
| Ibaraki HC2 | 9% | Dec. 1998 | - | 7% | 85% | 8% | 100 | |
| Ibaraki HE | 47% | May 1996 | - | 54% | 39% | 7% | 100 | |
| Ibaraki HF | 25% | May 2003 | - | 31% | 67% | 2% | 100 | |
| Gifu HK | 32% | May 1999 | - | 46% | 50% | 4% | 100 | |
| Kochi HL | 58% | Jun. 1996 | - | 55% | 39% | 6% | 100 | |
| Kochi HM | 53% | Jun. 2009 | 21.1% | 58.9% | 34.4% | 6.7% | 180 | |
| Kyoto HN | 19% | Apr. 2004 | - | 17% | 79% | 4% | 100 | |
The seed lot name includes native prefecture followed by codes for species (S, sugi; H, hinoki) and the seed orchard, respectively, in a single capital letter. If necessary, the name is suffixed by a reference number of the mother tree in each seed orchard.
Number of seeds used to determine germination rate (this study) and proportions of each seed group.
Fig 1Hyperspectral image analysis software developed for this study.
Fig 2Anatomical features of sound and unsound seeds of Cryptomeria japonica (sugi) and Chamaecyparis obtusa (hinoki).
Fig 3General features of sound and unsound seeds of Cryptomeria japonica (sugi) and Chamaecyparis obtusa (hinoki).
Fig 4Spectroscopic features of sound and unsound seeds of Cryptomeria japonica (sugi) and Chamaecyparis obtusa (hinoki).
Fig 5Correlation between anatomical soundness and seed quality index calculated from area-averaged reflectance spectra (SQIareal).
Fig 6Statistics of sound seed selection by single parameter method.
Calibration and validation of maxSQI in single parameter method for sound seed selection.
| Species | Validation | Calibration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 66.7% (120/180) | 17.2% (31/180) | |||
|
|
| 122.0 | 127.1 | ||
|
|
| 66.7% (120/180) | 67.2% (121/180) | ||
|
| 99.2% (119/120) | 98.3% (119/121) | |||
|
| 99.2% (119/120) | 99.2% (119/120) | |||
|
| 1.1% (2/180) | 1.7% (3/180) | |||
|
|
| 16.1% (29/180) | 17.2% (31/180) | ||
|
| 93.1% (27/29) | 93.5% (29/31) | |||
|
| 87.1% (27/31) | 93.5% (29/31) | |||
|
| 3.3% (6/180) | 2.2% (4/180) | |||
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 32.8% (59/180) | 58.9% (106/180) | |||
|
|
| 68.7 | 63.8 | 68.6 | |
|
|
| 35.6% (64/180) | 28.9% (52/180) | 35.6% (64/180) | |
|
| 90.6% (58/64) | 96.2% (50/52) | 90.6% (58/64) | ||
|
| 98.3% (58/59) | 84.7% (50/59) | 98.3% (58/59) | ||
|
| 3.9% (7/180) | 6.1% (11/180) | 3.9% (7/180) | ||
|
|
| 60.6% (109/180) | 56.1% (101/180) | 60.6% (109/180) | |
|
| 92.7% (101/109) | 96.0% (97/101) | 92.7% (101/109) | ||
|
| 95.3% (101/106) | 91.5% (97/106) | 95.3% (101/106) | ||
|
| 7.2% (13/180) | 7.2% (13/180) | |||
For definition of SR init, RR, SR, YR and TER, see Eqs 1–7.
Calibration errors.
Validation errors.
Fig 7Spatial distribution of pixelwise seed quality index (SQIpixel) in sound and unsound seeds of Cryptomeria japonica (sugi) and Chamaecyparis obtusa (hinoki).
Fig 8Statistics of sound seed selection by dual parameter method.
Calibration and validation of maxSQI and minPBR in dual parameter method for sound seed selection.
| Species | Validation | Calibration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 66.7% (120/180) | 17.2% (31/180) | |||
|
| 125 | 88 | |||
|
|
| 40% | 17% | ||
|
|
| 66.7% (120/180) | 66.7% (120/180) | ||
|
| 99.2% (119/120) | 98.3% (118/120) | |||
|
| 99.2% (119/120) | 98.3% (118/120) | |||
|
| 1.1% (2/180) | 2.2% (4/180) | |||
|
|
| 16.1% (29/180) | 16.1% (29/180) | ||
|
| 93.1% (27/29) | 96.6% (28/29) | |||
|
| 87.1% (27/31) | 90.3% (28/31) | |||
|
| 3.3% (6/180) | 2.2% (4/180) | |||
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 32.8% (59/180) | 58.9% (106/180) | |||
|
| 53 | 53 | 63 | ||
|
|
| 27% | 29% | 36% | |
|
|
| 33.9% (61/180) | 33.3% (60/180) | 28.9% (52/180) | |
|
| 95.1% (58/61) | 95.0% (57/60) | 98.1% (51/52) | ||
|
| 98.3% (58/59) | 96.6% (57/59) | 86.4% (51/59) | ||
|
| 2.2% (4/180) | 2.8% (5/180) | 5.0% (9/180) | ||
|
|
| 61.1% (110/180) | 57.2% (103/180) | 59.4% (107/180) | |
|
| 92.7% (102/110) | 98.1% (101/103) | 96.3% (103/107) | ||
|
| 96.2% (102/106) | 95.3% (101/106) | 97.2% (103/106) | ||
|
| 6.7% (12/180) | 3.9% (7/180) | |||
For definition of SR init, RR, SR, YR and TER, see Eqs 1–7.
Calibration errors.
Validation errors.
Fig 9Effects of single parameter method for sound seed selection on improving germination rate of Cryptomeria japonica (sugi) and Chamaecyparis obtusa (hinoki) seed lots.
Germination rate of Cryptomeria japonica and Chamaecyparis obtusa seed lots before and after sound seed selection.
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| 62% (May 2012) | 18.3% (Feb. 2014) | ||||||
|
| None | Single | Dual | None | Single | Dual | ||
|
|
| - | 122.0 | 125 | - | 127.1 | 88 | |
|
| - | - | 40% | - | - | 17% | ||
|
|
| 43.9% (79/180) | 70.5% (79/112) | 69.9% (79/113) | 14.4% (26/180) | 62.5% (25/40) | 67.6% (25/37) | |
|
|
| 35.0% (63/180) | 0.0% (0/112) | 0.9% (1/113) | 62.8% (113/180) | 2.5% (1/40) | 0.0% (0/37) | |
|
| 21.1% (38/180) | 29.5% (33/112) | 29.2% (33/113) | 22.8% (41/180) | 35.0% (14/40) | 32.4% (12/37) | ||
|
| 100.0% (180/180) | 100.0% (112/112) | 100.0% (113/113) | 100.0% (180/180) | 100.0% (40/40) | 100.0% (37/37) | ||
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| 41% (Jun. 2012) | 53% (Jun. 2009) | ||||||
|
| None | Single | Dual | None | Single | Dual | ||
|
|
| - | 68.7 | 53 | - | 68.6 | 53 | |
|
| - | - | 27% | - | - | 29% | ||
|
|
| 17.2% (31/180) | 46.9% (30/64) | 46.9% (30/64) | 21.1% (38/180) | 38.6% (37/96) | 39.8% (37/93) | |
|
|
| 51.1% (92/180) | 0.0% (0/64) | 0.0% (0/64) | 46.7% (84/180) | 8.3% (8/96) | 5.4% (5/93) | |
|
| 31.7% (57/180) | 53.1% (34/64) | 53.1% (34/64) | 32.2% (58/180) | 53.1% (51/96) | 54.8% (51/93) | ||
|
| 100.0% (180/180) | 100.0% (64/64) | 100.0% (64/64) | 100.0% (180/180) | 100.0% (96/96) | 100.0% (93/93) | ||
Composition of the major lipophilic compounds in different seed groups of Cryptomeria japonica and Chamaecyparis obtusa.
| Species (Seed Lot) | Relative Composition (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed Group | |||||
| Unsound | |||||
| Compound | Sound | Shibudane | Others | Hit Rate | |
|
| Fatty acids (C16, C18) | 72.5 | 23.9 | 17.7 | ≥ 98 |
| Long-chain hydrocarbons | 7.3 | 8.5 | 2.7 | ≥ 91 | |
| Isopimaric acid | 0.9 | 12.5 | 12.2 | ≥ 96 | |
| 4-(Thian-4-yl)thiane | 0.0 | 14.0 | 14.8 | ≥ 91 | |
| Ferruginol | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.9 | ≥ 99 | |
|
| Totarolone (13-Hydroxy-14-isopropylpodocarpa-8,11,13-trien-3-one) | 16.5 | 18.4 | 20.5 | ≥ 93 |
| Ferruginol | 9.1 | 11.4 | 12.5 | ≥ 83 | |
| 6-Hydroxy-1,1,4a-trimethyl-7-propan-2-yl-10,10a-dihydro-9H-phenanthren-2-one | 6.4 | 6.4 | 5.6 | ≥ 83 | |
| 4-(Thian-4-yl)thiane | 5.7 | 6.1 | 5.9 | ≥ 90 | |
| Monoterpenes | 5.2 | 2.2 | 2.7 | ≥ 91 | |
| Fatty acids (C16, C18) | 1.5 | 0.4 | 1.5 | ≥ 99 | |
Minimal hit rate obtained from database searches using GC-MS spectrogram from either of the three seed groups.