Literature DB >> 26083332

The Value of Endocervical Curettage in Addition to Biopsies in Women Referred to Colposcopy.

Jacolien van der Marel1, Agata Rodriguez, Marta Del Pino, Romy van Baars, David Jenkins, Miekel M van de Sandt, Aureli Torné, Jaume Ordi, Bram ter Harmsel, René H M Verheijen, Mark Schiffman, Julia C Gage, Wim G V Quint, Nicolas Wentzensen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Performing endocervical curettage (ECC) at colposcopy may increase the yield of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or worse (CIN2+) compared to biopsies alone. The additional benefit of ECC in detecting CIN2+ was studied in women with lesion-targeted biopsies (low-grade or worse impression) and women with biopsies of normal-appearing cervix (less than low-grade impression).
METHODS: In this subanalysis of a multicenter study, 126 women referred to colposcopy who had an ECC were included. Multiple directed biopsies were taken from lesions, and a nontargeted biopsy was added if fewer than 4 biopsies were collected. Risk strata of CIN2+ were evaluated based on cytology and colposcopic appearance to identify women for whom ECC would be most valuable.
RESULTS: The CIN2+ yield of ECC in addition to biopsies was 15 (11.9%) of 126. In women with lesion-targeted biopsies and ECC, the CIN2+ yield of targeted biopsies was 34 (51.5%) of 66, the yield of additional nontargeted biopsies was 1 (1.5%) of 66, and the additional CIN2+ yield of ECC was 5 (7.6%) of 66. The yield in women with nontargeted biopsies only and ECC was 5 (8.3%) 60, and the additional yield for ECC was 10 (16.7%) of 60. Endocervical curettage did not find disease in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
CONCLUSIONS: In women with less than low-grade impression and especially those with unsatisfactory colposcopy, the yield of CIN2+ was higher for ECC compared to nontargeted biopsies. The highest yield of CIN2+ from ECC was observed in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and less than low-grade impression, suggesting that disease is higher up in the endocervix in this group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26083332     DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Modern biomarkers for precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix : Histological-cytological correlation and use].

Authors:  D Schmidt
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  The role of endocervical curettage in detection and treatment of cervical canal lesions.

Authors:  Lin Lang; Ying Jia; Zhaoning Duan; Jin Wu; Ming Luo; Pu Tian
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Development and validation of a predictive model for endocervical curettage in patients referred for colposcopy: A multicenter retrospective diagnostic study in China.

Authors:  Peng Xue; Bingrui Wei; Samuel Seery; Qing Li; Zichen Ye; Yu Jiang; Youlin Qiao
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.026

Review 4.  False Negative Results in Cervical Cancer Screening-Risks, Reasons and Implications for Clinical Practice and Public Health.

Authors:  Anna Macios; Andrzej Nowakowski
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20

5.  A retrospective analysis of the utility of endocervical curettage in screening population.

Authors:  Yan Song; Yu-Qian Zhao; Ling Li; Qin-Jin Pan; Nan Li; Fang-Hui Zhao; Wen Chen; Xun Zhang; You-Lin Qiao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.