Literature DB >> 26083331

Gay and Bisexual Men's Willingness to Use a Self-Collected Anal Cancer Screening Test.

Joshua A Thompson1, Paul L Reiter, Annie-Laurie McRee, Jennifer L Moss, Noel T Brewer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated gay and bisexual men's willingness to self-administer an anal cancer screening test at home.
METHODS: We conducted 2 national, online cross-sectional surveys of self-identified gay and bisexual men: Study I in 2009 with men ages 20 to 59 (n = 306) and Study II in 2013 with men ages 18 to 26 (n = 428). We used multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine variables associated with willingness to self-administer the screening test.
RESULTS: Most men were willing to self-administer an anal cancer screening test (78% Study I; 67% Study II). In Study I, willingness was higher among men who trusted anal Paps to find treatable cancer (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.04-2.09) and who believed that men who have sex with men should be screened for anal cancer between 1 and 3 years vs. other intervals (aOR = 2.19; 95% CI, 1.17-4.10). In Study II, willingness was higher among men who perceived greater likelihood of anal cancer (aOR = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.12-2.20). Their most common concerns were not performing the test correctly and inaccuracy of results.
CONCLUSIONS: Many gay and bisexual men were willing to self-administer anal cancer screening tests at home. If routine screening is warranted, self-collected home testing could improve participation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26083331      PMCID: PMC4583826          DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  29 in total

1.  Feasibility of incorporating self-collected rectal swabs into a community venue-based survey to measure the prevalence of HPV infection in men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Mark Gilbert; Michael Kwag; Wendy Mei; Claudia Rank; Rhonda Kropp; Alberto Severini; Dirk van Niekerk; Chen Zhou; Natasha Press; Gina Ogilvie; Tom Wong
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 2.  The increasing incidence of anal cancer: can it be explained by trends in risk groups?

Authors:  R P van der Zee; O Richel; H J C de Vries; J M Prins
Journal:  Neth J Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.422

Review 3.  Self-collected HPV testing improves participation in cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  C Sarai Racey; Diana R Withrow; Dionne Gesink
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2013-02-11

4.  Longitudinal predictors of human papillomavirus vaccine initiation among adolescent girls in a high-risk geographic area.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Sami L Gottlieb; Paul L Reiter; Annie-Laurie McRee; Nicole Liddon; Lauri Markowitz; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 5.  Human papillomavirus type distribution in anal cancer and anal intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  Brooke E Hoots; Joel M Palefsky; Jeanne M Pimenta; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Evaluation and Management of Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in HIV-Negative and HIV-Positive Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Authors:  Ina U Park; Joel M Palefsky
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 7.  The epidemiology of anal human papillomavirus and related neoplasia.

Authors:  Joel M Palefsky; Mary Rubin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  HPV vaccine acceptability in a rural Southern area.

Authors:  Karah I Fazekas; Noel T Brewer; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 9.  Relative accuracy of cervical and anal cytology for detection of high grade lesions by colposcope guided biopsy: a cut-point meta-analytic comparison.

Authors:  Edward R Cachay; Wollelaw Agmas; William C Mathews
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Jan P Vandenbroucke; Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Cynthia D Mulrow; Stuart J Pocock; Charles Poole; James J Schlesselman; Matthias Egger
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  HIV-positive MSM's knowledge of HPV and anal cancer self-sampling: A scoping review.

Authors:  M K L Poon; J P H Wong; A T W Li; M Manuba; A Bisignano; M Owino; M Vahabi
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Exploring the Perceptions of Anal Cancer Screening and Behaviors Among Gay and Bisexual Men Infected With HIV.

Authors:  Alexis M Koskan; Natalie LeBlanc; Isabella Rosa-Cunha
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.302

3.  Preventive healthcare services use among transgender young adults.

Authors:  Annie-Laurie McRee; Amy L Gower; Paul L Reiter
Journal:  Int J Transgend       Date:  2018-05-25

Review 4.  Barriers and Facilitators to Cancer Screening Among LGBTQ Individuals With Cancer.

Authors:  Kelly S Haviland; Shannon Swette; Teresa Kelechi; Martina Mueller
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Facilitators and Barriers to Take Up Clinician-Collected and Self-Collected HPV Tests among Chinese Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Authors:  Zixin Wang; Yuan Fang; Ngai Sze Wong; Mary Ip; Xin Guo; Samuel Yeung Shan Wong
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 5.048

6.  Monitoring the impact of HPV vaccine in males-Considerations and challenges.

Authors:  Julia M L Brotherton; Anna R Giuliano; Lauri E Markowitz; Eileen F Dunne; Gina S Ogilvie
Journal:  Papillomavirus Res       Date:  2016-05-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.