| Literature DB >> 26082806 |
D B Araujo de Pina Cabral1, J R Dantas1, H Skärstrand2, B Barone1, F Carvalho3, R Tortora3, A Milech1, F Vaziri-Sani2, J E P Oliveira1, L Zajdenverg1, M Rodacki1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A dysregulation in the metabolism of lipids may be an early marker of autoimmunity in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D). It would be of general importance to identify metabolic patterns that would predict the risk for T1D later in life. The aim of this study was to perform a prospective evaluation of glutamine and phospholipids levels in Brazilian first degree relatives (FDR) of patients with T1D in a mean interval of 5 years.Entities:
Keywords: Antibodies; Diabetes; Metabolic; Multiethnic; Non-whites
Year: 2015 PMID: 26082806 PMCID: PMC4469243 DOI: 10.1186/s13098-015-0048-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr ISSN: 1758-5996 Impact factor: 3.320
General characteristics of the study sample
| Basal | Prospective | Controls |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDR |
| |||
| ( | ( | ( | ||
| Age (years) | 17.96 | 17.36 | 25.60 | 0.108 |
| (mean ± SD) | ±9.24 | ±8.68 | ±9.65 | |
| Gender [n (%)] | ||||
| Female | 15 (50) | 15 (50) | 9 (45) | 0.184 |
| Etnicity[n (%)] | ||||
| Whites | 15 (50) | 15 (50) | 8 (40) | 0.272 |
| Non-whites | 15 (50) | 15 (50) | 12 (60) | |
| GADA [n (%)] | 2 (7) | 2 (7) | 2 (10) | 0.887 |
| IA2A [n (%)] | 2 (7) | 1 (3) | 0 |
|
| IAA [n (%)] | 0 | 1 (3) | 0 |
|
| ZnT8A [n (%)] | 1 (3) | 1 (3) | 0 | 0.002 |
| Glutamine (mM) (mean ± SD) | 1.45 ± 0.69 | 1.34 ± 0.20 | 1.55 ± 0.27 | 0.075 |
| Phospholipids (μm) (mean ± SD) | 505.20 ± 194.89 | 468.56 ± 219.46 | 640.00 ± 259.20 | 0.028 |
Basal FDR = sample of the basal period; Prospective FDR = sample of the prospective period
Controls = non-diabetic individuals; SD = standard deviation; GADA = Glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody; IA2A = Insulinoma-associated antigen-2 autoantibody; IAA = autoantibody against insulin; ZnT8A = Zinc transporter 8 autoantibody
Fig. 1Glutamine levels (mM) in basal sample, prospective sample and controls. The Glutamine levels did not differ between these three groups (p = 0.075)
Fig. 2Phospholipids levels (μm) in basal sample, prospective sample and controls. The prospective group showed diminished levels of phospholipids in relation to the basal samples and controls (p = 0.028)