| Literature DB >> 26082144 |
Tamsyn M Uren Webster1, Janice A Shears1, Karen Moore1, Eduarda M Santos2.
Abstract
Estrogenic chemicals are major contaminants of surface waters and can threaten the sustainability of natural fish populations. Characterization of the global molecular mechanisms of toxicity of environmental contaminants has been conducted primarily in model species rather than species with limited existing transcriptomic or genomic sequence information. We aimed to investigate the global mechanisms of toxicity of an endocrine disrupting chemical of environmental concern [17β-estradiol (E2)] using high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) in an environmentally relevant species, brown trout (Salmo trutta). We exposed mature males to measured concentrations of 1.94, 18.06, and 34.38 ng E2/l for 4 days and sequenced three individual liver samples per treatment using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. Exposure to 34.4 ng E2/L resulted in 2,113 differentially regulated transcripts (FDR < 0.05). Functional analysis revealed upregulation of processes associated with vitellogenesis, including lipid metabolism, cellular proliferation, and ribosome biogenesis, together with a downregulation of carbohydrate metabolism. Using real-time quantitative PCR, we validated the expression of eight target genes and identified significant differences in the regulation of several known estrogen-responsive transcripts in fish exposed to the lower treatment concentrations (including esr1 and zp2.5). We successfully used RNA-Seq to identify highly conserved responses to estrogen and also identified some estrogen-responsive transcripts that have been less well characterized, including nots and tgm2l. These results demonstrate the potential application of RNA-Seq as a valuable tool for assessing mechanistic effects of pollutants in ecologically relevant species for which little genomic information is available.Entities:
Keywords: Illumina; RNA-Seq; salmonid; sequencing; transcriptomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26082144 PMCID: PMC4556936 DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00123.2014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Genomics ISSN: 1094-8341 Impact factor: 3.107
Target genes, primer sequences, and assay details for RT-QPCR analysis
| Target Gene | Symbol | Forward Primer (5′-3′) | Reverse Primer (5′-3′) | Product Size, bp | Ta, °C | PCR Efficiency, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein A | 118 | 59.5 | 95.5 | |||
| Estrogen receptor 1 | 126 | 59.5 | 101.9 | |||
| Carnitine O-octanoyltransferase | 83 | 53.5 | 105.0 | |||
| Nothepsin | 86 | 58.0 | 114.0 | |||
| Tyrosine aminotransferase | 83 | 56.0 | 95.7 | |||
| Transglutaminase 2 like | 75 | 56.0 | 99.9 | |||
| Vitellogenin 1 | 132 | 55.0 | 111.5 | |||
| Zona pellucida glycoprotein 2.5 | 75 | 55.0 | 101.2 | |||
| Zona pellucida glycoprotein 3a.2 | 86 | 54.5 | 112.6 |
RT-QPCR, real-time quantitative PCR; Ta, annealing temperature.
Fig. 1.Differentially expressed transcripts following exposure to 17β-estradiol (E2) in the liver of mature male brown trout. Multiple transcripts are included for each gene annotation, which potentially reflect the presence of different isoforms as well as redundant fragments within the list of differentially expressed transcripts. A: number of upregulated and downregulated transcripts in each treatment group calculated with EdgeR [false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05]. B: multidimensional scaling plot illustrating the very significant effect of exposure to 34.4 ng E2/l on the hepatic transcriptome of male brown trout (presented within the blue circle, for visualization purposes) compared with all other groups, based on the expression of all differentially regulated transcripts. Individual fish are represented by the following codes: c1, c2, c3 c4, c5, and c6 represent the control individuals; le1, le2, and le3 represent individuals exposed to 1.9 ng E2/l; me1, me2, and me3 represent individuals exposed to 18.1 ng E2/l; he1, he2, and he3 represent individuals exposed to 34.4 ng E2/l. C: heat map illustrating the relative expression level of all differentially regulated transcripts in all individual samples (individuals are represented by the same codes as in B). Data presented are log10-transformed read counts per transcript. The hierarchical clustering to generate gene and condition trees was conducted using a Euclidean distance metric in the R pheatmap package.
List of the 20 most upregulated and downregulated transcripts in fish exposed to 34.4 ng E2/l
| Upregulated | Downregulated | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symbol | Name | Fold Change | FDR | Symbol | Name | Fold Change | FDR |
| vitellogenin 1 | ↑ >5438 | 4.6E-119 | tyrosine aminotransferase | 8.9E-9 | |||
| nothepsin | ↑ >4475 | 5.4E-107 | transglutaminase 2, like | 3.3E-8 | |||
| vitellogenin 6 | ↑ >2000 | 1.3E-102 | cerebellin 8 | 2.6E-7 | |||
| vitellogenin 2 | ↑ >1100 | 7.3E-92 | hydroxy-delta-5-steroid dehydrogenase, 3beta- and steroid delta-isomerase | 2.8E-7 | |||
| si:dkey-4c23.3 | vitellogenin 1-1 | ↑ >220 | 9.6E-59 | ERBB receptor feedback inhibitor 1 | 5.5E-7 | ||
| vitellogenin 3 | ↑ >825 | 1.4E-56 | insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1a | 6.2E-7 | |||
| zona pellucida 3a.2 | ↑ 149 | 1.6E-53 | solute carrier family 3, member 2a | 6.8E-7 | |||
| si:dkey-179j5.2 | family with sequence similarity 20, member C | ↑ >185 | 5.0E-52 | chromosome 5 open reading frame 4 | 1.8E-6 | ||
| zona pellucida 2.5 | ↑ 77.6 | 1.1E-42 | purine nucleoside phosphorylase 5a | 2.3E-6 | |||
| zona pellucida 3a.1 | ↑ 161.5 | 1.1E-42 | eph receptor A8 | 7.5E-6 | |||
| vitellogenin 7 | ↑ >107 | 8.3E-42 | 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 1 | 8.1E-6 | |||
| carnitine o-octanoyltransferase | ↑ 54.4 | 4.9E-40 | PTC7 protein phosphatase homolog a | 9.2E-6 | |||
| estrogen receptor 1 | ↑ 25.7 | 1.6E-37 | si:dkey-238o13.4 | si:dkey-238o13.4 | 1.8E-5 | ||
| zona pellucida 2.2 | ↑ 160.7 | 5.1E-31 | ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 3b | 2.4E-5 | |||
| aquaporin 12 | ↑ 28.6 | 8.4E-31 | ret proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase | 4.3E-5 | |||
| leucine rich repeat containing 58b | ↑ 20.6 | 1.0E-30 | netrin g2a | 4.9E-5 | |||
| insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5a | ↑ >49 | 2.6E-30 | unc-51-like kinase 1a | 4.9E-5 | |||
| retinol dehydrogenase 10a | ↑ >108 | 8.8E-28 | growth factor receptor-bound protein 7 | 1.2E-4 | |||
| solute carrier family 7, member 11 | ↑ >51 | 8.9E-27 | claudin 11a | 1.3E-4 | |||
| lysophosphatidylglycerol acyltransferase 1 | ↑ 26.0 | 3.0E-25 | solute carrier family 25, member 29 | 1.4E-4 | |||
Where there were multiple differentially regulated transcripts assigned the same annotation, only the most significantly regulated transcript is included in this list.
For transcripts where no read counts were detected in any of the individuals in one of the groups, a nominal value of 1 count was given to each individual in that group to calculate a fold change value, for visualization purposes, in this table. E2, 17β-estradiol; FDR, false discovery rate.
Fig. 2.Overrepresented Gene Ontology (GO) terms and KEGG pathways (P < 0.05) in the list of upregulated (A) and downregulated transcripts (B) in fish exposed to 34.4 ng/l E2. Values presented represent the P value associated with overrepresentation. Darker shaded bars indicate GO terms where the adjusted P value was < 0.05 (Benjamini-Hochberg correction). Analysis was conducted using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) (Huang et al. 2008) v6.7, using our brown trout liver transcriptome as a background and Reduce and Visualize Gene Ontology (Revigo)(53) to condense redundant terms.
Fig. 3.Enriched gene network constructed using differentially expressed transcripts (FDR <0.05) following exposure to 34.4 ng E2/l. This was the highest scoring enriched network generated by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) on default settings. Associated functions of this network include amino acid metabolism, cell death and survival, endocrine system development, and small molecule biochemistry. Nodes represent genes and edges represent gene relationships. The intensity of node shading represents degree of upregulation (red) or downregulation (green), while uncolored nodes represent genes that were not identified as being differentially expressed in our experiment but were included in this network based on evidence stored in IPA databases. Node shapes denote enzymes, phosphatases, kinases, peptidases, G protein-coupled receptor, transmembrane receptor, cytokines, growth factor, ion channel, transporter, translation factor, nuclear receptor, transcription factor, and other. EEF1E1, eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 epsilon 1; EPRS, glutamyl-prolyl-tRNA synthetase; HSPA8, heat shock 70 kDa protein 8; GRWD1, glutamate-rich WD repeat containing 1; CKB, creatine kinase, brain; TUB84B, tubulin alpha 1-like protein; MCM8, minichromosome maintenance complex component 8; EZH2, enhancer of zeste homolog 2; TRIM35, tripartite motif containing 35; EZH1, enhancer of zeste homolog 1; ATAD3A/ATAS3B, ATPase family, AAA domain containing 3A/3B; GRIK5, glutamate receptor, ionotropic, kainate 5; KDM4A, lysine (K)-specific demethylase 4A; Hsp90, 90 kDa heat shock protein; ESR1, estrogen receptor 1; UBALD1, UBA-like domain containing 1; NIPBL, Nipped-B homolog; MYC, v-myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog; ASS1, argininosuccinate synthase 1; RPS23, ribosomal protein S23; NOC2L, nucleolar complex associated 2 homolog; YBX1, Y box binding protein 1; NCL, nucleolin; POLR1A, polymerase (RNA) I polypeptide A, 194 kDa; SUDS3, suppressor of defective silencing 3 homolog; RBMS2, RNA binding motif, single stranded interacting protein 2; SRP72, signal recognition particle 72 kDa.
Fig. 4.Transcript profile analysis for a selection of target genes in all males (A) and females (B), conducted by RT-QPCR. Data are presented as mean fold-change relative to expression in the control group. Relative expression was calculated as ratio of the expression for each target gene/expression for vapa mRNA. Expression of tgm2l was quantified only in mature males and was below the detection limit of the RT-QPCR assay for both immature males and females (n/d, nondetectable). Data were collected from 3–7 males and 2–6 females per treatment group. Individuals for which the expression was below the detection limit of the assay were excluded from the analysis. Asterisks represent significant differences between each treatment group and the control group (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).