PURPOSE: We aim to investigate the association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) therapy and colorectal cancer (CRC) by conducting a systematic review with meta-analysis. METHODS: Literature was searched on PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane library to identify relevant studies evaluating ACEIs/ARBs therapy and risk of CRC incidence or survival of CRC patients. Pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals was calculated for the association between ACEIs/ARBs and CRC risk and mortality. RESULTS: Eleven observational studies were included in the systematic review. A meta-analysis of six studies totaling 113,048 individuals indicated a 6% decreased risk of CRC in ACEIs/ARBs users compared to non-users (95% CI 0.89-0.98). In the four case-control studies, individuals using ACEIs/ARBs were associated with a 6% decreased risk of CRC (95% CI 0.90-0.99). The meta-analysis of three studies investigating the relationship between ACEIs/ARBs and survival of CRC did not show a significantly decreased mortality in ACEIs/ARBs users (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60-1.09). Seven studies evaluated the dose-response relationship between ACEIs/ARBs therapy and CRC, and two of them showed that the association was related to longer duration and higher dose. CONCLUSIONS: CEIs/ARBs therapy might be associated with a reduce risk of CRC development, but whether use of these medications improves the outcomes of CRC remains unknown. Large-scale and more robust studies are needed to further explore this association.
PURPOSE: We aim to investigate the association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) therapy and colorectal cancer (CRC) by conducting a systematic review with meta-analysis. METHODS: Literature was searched on PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane library to identify relevant studies evaluating ACEIs/ARBs therapy and risk of CRC incidence or survival of CRC patients. Pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals was calculated for the association between ACEIs/ARBs and CRC risk and mortality. RESULTS: Eleven observational studies were included in the systematic review. A meta-analysis of six studies totaling 113,048 individuals indicated a 6% decreased risk of CRC in ACEIs/ARBs users compared to non-users (95% CI 0.89-0.98). In the four case-control studies, individuals using ACEIs/ARBs were associated with a 6% decreased risk of CRC (95% CI 0.90-0.99). The meta-analysis of three studies investigating the relationship between ACEIs/ARBs and survival of CRC did not show a significantly decreased mortality in ACEIs/ARBs users (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60-1.09). Seven studies evaluated the dose-response relationship between ACEIs/ARBs therapy and CRC, and two of them showed that the association was related to longer duration and higher dose. CONCLUSIONS: CEIs/ARBs therapy might be associated with a reduce risk of CRC development, but whether use of these medications improves the outcomes of CRC remains unknown. Large-scale and more robust studies are needed to further explore this association.
Authors: Phyo T Htoo; Til Stürmer; Michele Jonsson-Funk; Virginia Pate; Ross J Simpson; Jennifer L Lund Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Yin Zhang; Mingyang Song; Andrew T Chan; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Walter C Willett; Edward L Giovannucci Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2022-09-22 Impact factor: 9.075
Authors: Theodore M Brasky; Katrina F Flores; Joseph C Larson; Alison M Newton; Aladdin H Shadyab; Jonathan H Watanabe; Dorothy S Lane; Cynthia A Thomson; Andrea Z LaCroix Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-02-24 Impact factor: 4.090