Literature DB >> 26081116

Proving communal warfare among hunter-gatherers: The Quasi-Rousseauan error.

Azar Gat1.   

Abstract

Was human fighting always there, as old as our species? Or is it a late cultural invention, emerging after the transition to agriculture and the rise of the state, which began, respectively, only around ten thousand and five thousand years ago? Viewed against the life span of our species, Homo sapiens, stretching back 150,000-200,000 years, let alone the roughly two million years of our genus Homo, this is the tip of the iceberg. We now have a temporal frame and plenty of empirical evidence for the "state of nature" that Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacque Rousseau discussed in the abstract and described in diametrically opposed terms. All human populations during the Pleistocene, until about 12,000 years ago, were hunter-gatherers, or foragers, of the simple, mobile sort that lacked accumulated resources. Studying such human populations that survived until recently or still survive in remote corners of the world, anthropology should have been uniquely positioned to answer the question of aboriginal human fighting or lack thereof. Yet access to, and the interpretation of, that information has been intrinsically problematic. The main problem has been the "contact paradox." Prestate societies have no written records of their own. Therefore, documenting them requires contact with literate state societies that necessarily affects the former and potentially changes their behavior, including fighting.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australian Aborigines; Rousseauism; hunter-gatherer warfare; naturally evolved predispositions for violence and peace

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26081116     DOI: 10.1002/evan.21446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Anthropol        ISSN: 1060-1538


  9 in total

1.  Two types of aggression in human evolution.

Authors:  Richard W Wrangham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Is War in Our Nature? : What Is Right and What Is Wrong about the Seville Statement on Violence.

Authors:  Azar Gat
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2019-06

3.  Resource scarcity drives lethal aggression among prehistoric hunter-gatherers in central California.

Authors:  Mark W Allen; Robert Lawrence Bettinger; Brian F Codding; Terry L Jones; Al W Schwitalla
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Human niche, human behaviour, human nature.

Authors:  Agustin Fuentes
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  A meta-analysis of the association between male dimorphism and fitness outcomes in humans.

Authors:  Linda H Lidborg; Catharine Penelope Cross; Lynda G Boothroyd
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  Violence in the prehistoric period of Japan: the spatio-temporal pattern of skeletal evidence for violence in the Jomon period.

Authors:  Hisashi Nakao; Kohei Tamura; Yui Arimatsu; Tomomi Nakagawa; Naoko Matsumoto; Takehiko Matsugi
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  A model for warfare in stratified small-scale societies: The effect of within-group inequality.

Authors:  Sagar Pandit; Gauri Pradhan; Carel van Schaik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Population is the main driver of war group size and conflict casualties.

Authors:  Rahul C Oka; Marc Kissel; Mark Golitko; Susan Guise Sheridan; Nam C Kim; Agustín Fuentes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Why Are No Animal Communication Systems Simple Languages?

Authors:  Michael D Beecher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.