Literature DB >> 2608085

Median to radial latency difference test in mild carpal tunnel syndrome.

W S Pease1, C D Cannell, E W Johnson.   

Abstract

Electrodiagnostic assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is hampered by the normal variability of conduction velocity, amplitude and duration of evoked responses, and hand temperature. Comparative testing of other nerves in the same hand may control for these variables and improve sensitivity for detection of mild focal entrapment. In consecutive cases referred for evaluation, antidromic sensory latencies were recorded from the thumb over 10 cm segments of the median and radial nerves, and the difference between these latencies was calculated. Median sensory antidromic conduction to digit III, ulnar sensory conduction, and median motor latency measurements were also made. Three hundred and thirty-three upper limbs were studied in 262 patients. All tests were normal in 73 arms. Mild conduction slowing was identified in 86 median nerves. The median-radial latency difference was increased in 87% of these mild cases. The median-ulnar latency difference was diagnostic in 88%. Either median-radial or median-ulnar latency differences were abnormal in all confirmed cases. The routine median motor and sensory distal latency tests had sensitivities of 29% and 52%, respectively. Radial responses were elicited in 99% of the hands studied. The median-radial latency difference in digit I is a sensitive indicator of mild CTS that can be measured quickly with a minimum of discomfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2608085     DOI: 10.1002/mus.880121106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  7 in total

1.  Carpal tunnel syndrome: evaluation of a new method of assessing median nerve conduction at the wrist.

Authors:  C A Dunne; P W Thompson; J Cole; J Dunning; C N Martyn; D Coggon; C Cooper
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Carpal tunnel syndrome: a review.

Authors:  F P Cantatore; F Dell'Accio; G Lapadula
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Comparison of sensory conduction techniques in the diagnosis of mild idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: which finger, which test?

Authors:  Serpil Demirci; Birkan Sonel
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Lumbrical-interosseous recording technique versus routine electrodiagnostic methods in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Figen Yılmaz; Osman Hakan Gündüz; Gülseren Akyüz
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-08-17

Review 5.  Practical approach to electrodiagnosis of the carpal tunnel syndrome: A review.

Authors:  Keivan Basiri; Bashar Katirji
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2015-02-17

6.  Validity of current electrodiagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Bina Eftekharsadat; Tannaz Ahadi; Gholam Reza Raissi; Saied Kazem Shakoory; Seyed Mohammad Fereshtehnejad
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2014-06-14

Review 7.  Antidromic vs orthodromic sensory median nerve conduction studies.

Authors:  Josep Valls-Sole; Joao Leote; Pedro Pereira
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2016-04-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.