Literature DB >> 26080180

Assessment of Patients Who Underwent Nasal Reconstruction After Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Excision.

Hakan Uzun1, Ozan Bitik, Haldun Onuralp Kamburoğlu, Mehmet Dadaci, Mert Çaliş, Engin Öcal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Basal and squamous cell carcinomas are the most common malignant cutaneous lesions affecting the nose. With the rising incidence of skin cancers, plastic surgeons increasingly face nasal reconstruction challenges. Although multiple options exist, optimal results are obtained when "like is used to repair like". We aimed to introduce a simple algorithm for the reconstruction of nasal defects with local flaps, realizing that there is always more than one option for reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 163 patients who underwent nasal reconstruction after excision of non-melanoma skin cancer between March 2011 and April 2014. We analyzed the location of the defects and correlated them with the techniques used to reconstruct them.
RESULTS: There were 66 males and 97 females (age, 21-98 years). Basal cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 121 patients and squamous cell carcinoma in 42. After tumor excision, all the defects were immediately closed by either primary closure or local flap options such as Limberg, Miter, glabellar, bilobed, nasolabial, V-Y advancement, and forehead flaps.
CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining tumor-free borders and a pleasing aesthetic result are major concerns in nasal reconstruction. Defect reconstruction and cosmesis are as important as rapid recovery and quick return to normal daily activities, and these should be considered before performing any procedure, particularly in elderly patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26080180     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  4 in total

1.  Surgical Treatment and Reconstruction of Nasal Defects According to the Aesthetic Subunits Principles.

Authors:  José Miguel Núñez-Castañeda; Silvana Lucia Chang-Grozo
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-03-16

Review 2.  Effectiveness of Nasolabial Flap Versus Paramedian Forehead Flap for Nasal Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sourabh Shankar Chakraborty; Akhil Dhanesh Goel; Ranjit Kumar Sahu; Manojit Midya; Sudeshna Acharya; Neha Shakrawal
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 3.  Surgical Treatment with Locoregional Flap for the Nose.

Authors:  Marco Marcasciano; Mauro Tarallo; Michele Maruccia; Benedetta Fanelli; Giorgio La Viola; Donato Casella; Lenia Sanchèz Wals; Sergio Ciaschi; Paolo Fioramonti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-24       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Complex Nasal Reconstruction in a Wide-awake Ambulatory Setting: A Study of Efficacy and Perioperative Patient Experience.

Authors:  Hannah N St Denis-Katz; Michael Bastianelli; Jillian Macdonald; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-07-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.