Literature DB >> 26080148

Prediction of the Need for Orthognathic Surgery in Patients With Cleft Lip and/or Palate.

Heon-Mook Park1, Pil-Jong Kim, Hong-Gee Kim, Sukwha Kim, Seung-Hak Baek.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the cephalometric variables that can predict the future need for orthognathic surgery or distraction osteogenesis in Korean male patients with nonsyndromic cleft lip and alveolus (CLA) and unilateral (UCLP) and bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). A total of 131 patients who were treated by one surgeon and one orthodontist using identical protocol were divided into CLA group (n = 35), UCLP group (n = 56), and BCLP group (n = 40). Lateral cephalograms were taken before secondary alveolar bone graft (T0; mean age, 9.3 years) and at the minimum of 15 years of age (T1; mean age, 17.3 years). The cephalometric variables of these cephalograms were measured. At T1 stage, 3 cephalometric criteria were used to divide the subjects into surgery and nonsurgery groups (ANB ≤ -3 degrees; Wits appraisal ≤ -5 mm; Harvold unit difference ≥ 34 mm for surgery group). The feature wrapping method was used to determine the cephalometric variables at T0 stage for a prediction model. At T1 stage, 27 (20.6%) of 131 subjects required surgical intervention to correct their sagittal skeletal discrepancies. Frequency was significantly different among the CLA, UCLP, and BCLP groups (8.5%, 21.4%, and 30.0%, respectively; P < 0.05; [CLA, UCLP] < [UCLP, BCLP]). A total of 10 cephalometric variables of T0 stage were selected as predictors, and weighted classification accuracy was 77.3%. The frequency of surgical intervention increased with cleft severity. Ten cephalometric variables might be regarded as effective predictors of the future need for surgery to correct their sagittal skeletal discrepancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26080148     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  4 in total

1.  [Finite element analysis of the comprehensive impact of scar and maxillary expansion combined with protraction on the development of maxilla with cleft lip and palate after repair operation].

Authors:  Wei Huang; Ying-Hui Li; Kai-Li Guo; Yong-Chuan Zhou; Xiang-Jun Li
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-12-01

2.  Cephalometric Predictors of Future need for Orthognathic Surgery in Korean Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Despite Long-term Use of Facemask with Miniplate.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Yu; Seung-Hak Baek; Jin-Young Choi; Jong-Ho Lee; Sukwha Kim; Sung-Woon On
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  Machine Learning Demonstrates High Accuracy for Disease Diagnosis and Prognosis in Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Angelos Mantelakis; Yannis Assael; Parviz Sorooshian; Ankur Khajuria
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-06-24

Review 4.  Efficacy and morbidity of biodegradable versus titanium osteosyntheses in orthognathic surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Barzi Gareb; Nico B van Bakelen; Pieter U Dijkstra; Arjan Vissink; Ruud R M Bos; Baucke van Minnen
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.612

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.