Kotaro Shoji1, Roman Cieslak2, Ewelina Smoktunowicz2, Anna Rogala2, Charles C Benight1, Aleksandra Luszczynska3. 1. a Trauma, Health, & Hazards Center , University of Colorado Colorado Springs , Colorado Springs , CO , USA. 2. b Department of Psychology , University of Social Sciences and Humanities , Warsaw , Poland. 3. c Department of Psychology , University of Social Sciences and Humanities , Wroclaw , Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at systematically reviewing and meta-analyzing the strength of associations between self-efficacy and job burnout (the global index and its components). We investigated whether these associations would be moderated by: (a) the type of measurement of burnout and self-efficacy, (b) the type of occupation, (c) the number of years of work experience and age, and (d) culture. DESIGN AND METHODS: We systematically reviewed and analyzed 57 original studies (N = 22,773) conducted among teachers (k = 29), health-care providers (k = 17), and other professionals (k = 11). RESULTS: The average effect size estimate for the association between self-efficacy and burnout was of medium size (-.33). Regarding the three burnout components, the largest estimate of the average effect (-.49) was found for the lack of accomplishment. The estimates of the average effect were similar, regardless of the type of measures of burnout and self-efficacy measurement (general vs. context-specific). Significantly larger estimates of the average effects were found among teachers (compared to health-care providers), older workers, and those with longer work experience. CONCLUSIONS: Significant self-efficacy-burnout relationships were observed across countries, although the strength of associations varied across burnout components, participants' profession, and their age.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at systematically reviewing and meta-analyzing the strength of associations between self-efficacy and job burnout (the global index and its components). We investigated whether these associations would be moderated by: (a) the type of measurement of burnout and self-efficacy, (b) the type of occupation, (c) the number of years of work experience and age, and (d) culture. DESIGN AND METHODS: We systematically reviewed and analyzed 57 original studies (N = 22,773) conducted among teachers (k = 29), health-care providers (k = 17), and other professionals (k = 11). RESULTS: The average effect size estimate for the association between self-efficacy and burnout was of medium size (-.33). Regarding the three burnout components, the largest estimate of the average effect (-.49) was found for the lack of accomplishment. The estimates of the average effect were similar, regardless of the type of measures of burnout and self-efficacy measurement (general vs. context-specific). Significantly larger estimates of the average effects were found among teachers (compared to health-care providers), older workers, and those with longer work experience. CONCLUSIONS: Significant self-efficacy-burnout relationships were observed across countries, although the strength of associations varied across burnout components, participants' profession, and their age.
Entities:
Keywords:
Job burnout; human services; meta-analysis; self-efficacy
Authors: Nicole E Pal; Stephanie T Gumuchian; Vanessa C Delisle; Mia Pépin; Vanessa L Malcarne; Marie-Eve Carrier; Linda Kwakkenbos; Sandra Peláez; Ghassan El-Baalbaki; Brett D Thombs Journal: J Scleroderma Relat Disord Date: 2017-09-25
Authors: Anna Rogala; Kotaro Shoji; Aleksandra Luszczynska; Anna Kuna; Carolyn Yeager; Charles C Benight; Roman Cieslak Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2016-01-08