Literature DB >> 26079620

Autochthonous Chikungunya Transmission and Extreme Climate Events in Southern France.

David Roiz1, Philippe Boussès1, Frédéric Simard1, Christophe Paupy1, Didier Fontenille2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extreme precipitation events are increasing as a result of ongoing global warming, but controversy surrounds the relationship between flooding and mosquito-borne diseases. A common view among the scientific community and public health officers is that heavy rainfalls have a flushing effect on breeding sites, which negatively affects vector populations, thereby diminishing disease transmission. During 2014 in Montpellier, France, there were at least 11 autochthonous cases of chikungunya caused by the invasive tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus in the vicinity of an imported case. We show that an extreme rainfall event increased and extended the abundance of the disease vector Ae. albopictus, hence the period of autochthonous transmission of chikungunya. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: We report results from close monitoring of the adult and egg population of the chikungunya vector Ae. albopictus through weekly sampling over the entire mosquito breeding season, which revealed an unexpected pattern. Statistical analysis of the seasonal dynamics of female abundance in relation to climatic factors showed that these relationships changed after the heavy rainfall event. Before the inundations, accumulated temperatures are the most important variable predicting Ae. albopictus seasonal dynamics. However, after the inundations, accumulated rainfall over the 4 weeks prior to capture predicts the seasonal dynamics of this species and extension of the transmission period.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our empirical data suggests that heavy rainfall events did increase the risk of arbovirus transmission in Southern France in 2014 by favouring a rapid rise in abundance of vector mosquitoes. Further studies should now confirm these results in different ecological contexts, so that the impact of global change and extreme climatic events on mosquito population dynamics and the risk of disease transmission can be adequately understood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26079620      PMCID: PMC4469319          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis        ISSN: 1935-2727


Introduction

Extreme precipitation events are envisaged to increase as a result of ongoing global warming [1]. Heavy rains have consequences for infectious diseases, with, in particular, some vector-borne disease outbreaks being associated with flooding [2,3]. However, the relationships between flooding and vector-borne diseases are mired in controversy and need to be clarified [4]. A common belief among the scientific community and public health officers is that “heavy rainfalls produce a flushing effect of immature mosquitoes (larvae and pupae) in breeding containers, diminishing the mosquito abundance” [3,5], in turn diminishing disease transmission. The common view in most works on climate and mosquito-borne diseases is that “Intense rainfall may wash out breeding sites and thus have a negative effect on vector populations” [6]. During September-November 2014, French health authorities reported a cluster of 11 autochthonous cases of chikungunya in the city of Montpellier in the vicinity of a recently imported case [7, 8]. This was the first report of locally transmitted chikungunya in France since 2010, adding to the 4 cases of dengue reported earlier that year in the neighbouring PACA region, and dengue cases in 2010 and 2013 [7-9]. Abundances of the tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus, the competent disease vector, in an increasing number of places and the large number of imported cases of chikungunya (443 cases), dengue (163 cases) and co-infections (6 cases) in France [7], did indeed concur to increase the risk of autochthonous transmission in Southern France. The objective of this study was to analyse the influence of climatic variables, including an extreme rainfall event, on Ae. albopictus abundance in Montpellier in 2014, and its impact on the risk of autochthonous chikungunya transmission.

Methods

Mosquitoes were sampled in the municipalities of Montpellier and Castelnau-le-Lez in the Province of Hérault, region Languedoc-Roussillon, southern France, with a Mediterranean climate and a resident human population of 400.470 inhabitants spread over 14.62 Km2. Adult mosquitoes were collected using 24 BG-Sentinel traps (BioGents, Regensburg, Germany), with the attractant BG lure, a synthetic lure developed to mimic human odors, consisting of lactic acid, ammonia, and caproic acid on a long-lasting lure. Traps were located in 8 sampling sites separated by a mean geographic distance of 2.2 Km. Each sampling site consisted of a private house with garden, and three trap replicates set 5–10 m apart were operated in each site. Each trap was connected to a battery (12 V), and the captures were conducted for 24 H, once a week, from the 21th week (2nd week of May) to the 50th week (2nd week of December) of 2014. Sampled mosquitoes were transported live to the laboratory in an insulated thermal bag filled with ice and frozen at -20°C. The species and sex of each individual were identified in the laboratory with a stereomicroscope using the appropriate taxonomic keys [10]. Although several species were captured, including Ae. albopictus, Culex pipiens, Culiseta longiareolata, Aedes caspius and Anopheles maculipennis s.l., only Ae. albopictus females were included in the analysis. The mean weekly abundance of Ae. albopictus females captured in the 24 traps was used as the dependent variable. In parallell, eggs of Ae. albopictus were collected using oviposition traps (ovitraps) placed in each of the 24 locations where the adult population was monitored. Bacilus thuringiensis var. israeliensis granules (VectoBac, ValentBioSciences) were added to the water to prevent larval development and traps were checked once a week. Eggs were counted under a stereomicroscope and averaged across traps and over collection sites. Daily mean, minimum and maximum air temperatures, daily total precipitation and insolation time for the study period were obtained from the Montpellier Fréjorgues meteorological station (http://www.meteociel.fr/climatologie/villes.php?code=7643&mois=6&annee=2014), located 6 Km from the city centre. For the purposes of our study, these data were pooled by week. Then, for temperature, weekly means and weekly range were computed, and for rainfall, total weekly precipitation was calculated. Environmental variables may have a strong influence on mosquito populations not only at the time of adult capture but also, and mainly, at egg-laying and larval development which occur 1–4 weeks earlier. Therefore, accumulated temperature and rainfall were calculated over the 4 weeks preceding the week of sampling. Growing Degree Days (GDD) were calculated with a baseline temperature of 11°C to compute weekly accumulated Growing Degree Days (GDD). Based on our previous work, we also assessed a ‘bounded’ estimate of the accumulated GDD (Bounded accumulated GDD), with a maximum threshold of 1350 accumulated GDD above which any further increase in GDD is considered detrimental and counted negatively [11, 12]. We developed a Generalized Linear Model with negative binomial distribution (as the data were over-dispersed) to investigate whether Ae. albopictus adult female abundance was influenced by temperature and rainfall before and after the extreme rainfall event. The response variable was the total weekly Ae. albopictus adult female abundance, and the selected explanatory variables were the average weekly temperatures (minimum, mean and maximum), the total weekly precipitation, all the accumulated temperature and rainfall variables (see Climatic data section for details), Weekly Growing Degree Days, Accumulated Growing Degree Days and Bounded Accumulated Growing Degree Days. Due to the highly expected co-linearity between the explanatory variables, different univariate models were built and the best model was selected on the basis of AIC (Akaike Information Criterion), ΔAIC and Akaike weights. We calculated the explained deviance as: (Null deviance-Residual deviance)/ Null deviance. Statistical analysis was performed in R version 2.14.2 [13] with the packages MASS [14] and MuMin[15].

Results

We developed a close monitoring of the adult population of the chikungunya vector Ae. albopictus in Montpellier through weekly sampling over the entire mosquito breeding season (i.e., May to November 2014). Although mosquito densities steadily declined after peaking in late August, extreme rainfall events flooding the area at the end of September and beginning of October (Week 39), with up to 252 mm of rain falling in just 3 hours (recorded on 29th September in Montpellier), resulted in an explosive mosquito population growth extending into October and surpassing the abundance peak recorded earlier in August (Fig 1). Statistical analysis (Table 1; Fig 2) revealed that, before the inundations, temperature (Accumulated Growing Degree Days) was the most important variable predicting the seasonal dynamics of Ae. albopictus, with 69.3% of the variance explained. However, after the inundations, accumulated rainfall over the 4 weeks before capture predicted Ae. albopictus seasonal dynamics, explaining 92.3% of the variance (Table 2; Fig 2). The seasonal pattern of eggs abundance in the ovitraps closely matched that of female abundance, with a lag of several days (Fig 1).
Fig 1

Mean number of Ae. albopictus eggs per trap per week (black line), Ae. albopictus females per trap per day (grey area) in 24 BGs and 24 ovitraps positioned in 8 locations in Montpellier in 2014.

Autochthonous chikungunya transmission period (green line); weekly bounded accumulated Growing Degree Days (red line); weekly rainfall (black bars).

Table 1

Results of the model selection of the Generalized Linear Model with negative binomial distribution showing the effect of climatic variables on Ae. albopictus abundances before the inundation in 2014.

VariableAICcdeltaweight
Bounded accumulated GDD86.200.000.99
Accumulated GDD95.379.170.01
Accumulated temperatures one month before99.1212.920.00
Maximum weekly temperatures103.4117.210.00
Accumulated temperatures two weeks before103.6617.460.00
Accumulated rainfall two weeks before104.3018.100.00
Growing degree days (GDD)105.0418.830.00
Mean weekly temperature105.0418.830.00
Weekly rainfall105.6519.450.00
Weekly insolation time105.9519.740.00
Accumulated rainfall one week before106.1219.920.00
Accumulated temperature one week before106.3320.130.00
Weekly minimal temperatures106.4920.280.00
Accumulated rainfall four weeks before107.0720.860.00

The best model explains 69.3% of the variance.

Fig 2

Results from the Generalized Linear Model with negative binomial distribution showing the impact of climatic variables on Ae. albopictus abundances before (left panel) and after (right panel) the extreme precipitation event in 2014.

Before the inundations, weekly bounded accumulated Growing Degree Days were related to vector abundance. After the inundations, accumulated rainfall is more important than temperature (see also Table 1).

Table 2

Results of the model selection of the Generalized Linear Model with negative binomial distribution showing the effect of climatic variables on Ae. albopictus abundances after the inundation in 2014.

VariableAICcdeltaweight
Accumulated rainfall four weeks before46.540.000.60
Maximum weekly temperatures48.351.810.24
Accumulated temperatures two weeks before50.113.570.10
Accumulated temperature one week before53.346.810.02
Mean weekly temperature54.017.470.01
Growing degree days (GDD)55.088.540.01
Accumulated GDD55.679.140.01
Accumulated temperatures one month before56.039.500.01
Weekly minimal temperatures58.1911.660.00
Bounded accumulated GDD58.6812.150.00
Weekly insolation time61.7815.250.00
Accumulated rainfall two weeks before62.4515.920.00
Accumulated rainfall one week before64.4017.860.00
Weekly rainfall64.8818.340.00

The best model explains 92.3% of the variance.

The best model explains 69.3% of the variance. The best model explains 92.3% of the variance.

Mean number of Ae. albopictus eggs per trap per week (black line), Ae. albopictus females per trap per day (grey area) in 24 BGs and 24 ovitraps positioned in 8 locations in Montpellier in 2014.

Autochthonous chikungunya transmission period (green line); weekly bounded accumulated Growing Degree Days (red line); weekly rainfall (black bars).

Results from the Generalized Linear Model with negative binomial distribution showing the impact of climatic variables on Ae. albopictus abundances before (left panel) and after (right panel) the extreme precipitation event in 2014.

Before the inundations, weekly bounded accumulated Growing Degree Days were related to vector abundance. After the inundations, accumulated rainfall is more important than temperature (see also Table 1).

Discussion

We have shown that the extreme precipitation event clearly contributed to increasing and extending the abundance of the disease vector Ae. albopictus, and hence to extending the period of autochthonous transmission of chikungunya in Montpellier in 2014. Female density increased rapidly after the extreme event, soon followed by a rise in the number of eggs collected in ovitraps. Therefore, and contrary to common belief [3,4,5,6], our empirical data suggest that heavy rainfall events do not, in fact, decrease but instead may increase the global risk of chikungunya (and other arboviruses) transmission, by extending the transmission season. This is the first evidence to support the relationship between heavy rainfall and chikungunya transmission. Our observations before and after the extreme precipitation event, suggest that heavy rains after a dry period with low precipitations have filled all the peridomestic containers where desiccated eggs of Ae. albopictus were to be found, and that it was this situation which gave rise to the increase in mosquito numbers several weeks later. Indeed, the majority of breeding sites colonized by Ae. albopictus larvae in Mediterranean Europe are small peridomestic containers of less than 10 L. such as scuppers, flowerpot saucers, drums, buckets, solid waste and others, whereas the productivity of catch basins is generally much lower [16, 17, 18]. In Southern France, more than 80% of breeding sites are situated in the private domain and only 12% of the immature stages were detected in catch basins [16]. The outcome of such extreme climatic events might therefore be different in different ecological contexts, depending on the larval ecology of the species. For example, West Nile virus (WNV) outbreaks have been associated with flooding, in Romania, the Czech Republic and Russia [19, 20, 21]. However, these outbreaks were related to flooded building basements, resulting in an increase in populations of the WNV vector Culex pipiens, which thrives in large water collections that are not suitable for Ae. albopictus development. Further studies are needed to explore the general relevance of our findings and their implications for diseases transmission by Aedes albopictus in Europe, as well as elsewhere where the species has established. Because our data showed that heavy rains in Mediterranean cities impacted on Ae. albopictus abundances, we propose that an effort on source reduction campaigns must be implemented after such heavy rainfall event. In fact, these high-volume rainfall events, referred to as Cévenol episodes, are relatively frequent in the south of France. We further encourage tropical countries that are endemic for Chikungunya and Dengue to develop similar studies in order to explore the relevance of enforcing source reduction approaches following extreme climatic events and we believe that our results should be brought to the attention of those involved in the surveillance and control of vectors and vector-borne diseases in the context of global change in temperate as well as tropical areas of the world.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Infectious diseases of severe weather-related and flood-related natural disasters.

Authors:  Louise C Ivers; Edward T Ryan
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.915

2.  Terra and Aqua satellites track tiger mosquito invasion: modelling the potential distribution of Aedes albopictus in north-eastern Italy.

Authors:  Markus Neteler; David Roiz; Duccio Rocchini; Cristina Castellani; Annapaola Rizzoli
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.918

3.  Chikungunya outbreak in Montpellier, France, September to October 2014.

Authors:  E Delisle; C Rousseau; B Broche; I Leparc-Goffart; G L'Ambert; A Cochet; C Prat; V Foulongne; J B Ferre; O Catelinois; O Flusin; E Tchernonog; I E Moussion; A Wiegandt; A Septfons; A Mendy; M B Moyano; L Laporte; J Maurel; F Jourdain; J Reynes; M C Paty; F Golliot
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2015-04-30

4.  Control of the Asian tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus) in a firmly established area in Spain: risk factors and people's involvement.

Authors:  Gisela Chebabi Abramides; David Roiz; Raimon Guitart; Salvador Quintana; Nuria Giménez
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.184

5.  Autochthonous dengue emphasises the threat of arbovirosis in Europe.

Authors:  Francis Schaffner; Didier Fontenille; Alexander Mathis
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 25.071

6.  Risk factors for West Nile virus infection and meningoencephalitis, Romania, 1996.

Authors:  L L Han; F Popovici; J P Alexander; V Laurentia; L A Tengelsen; C Cernescu; H E Gary; N Ion-Nedelcu; G L Campbell; T F Tsai
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Climatic factors driving invasion of the tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus) into new areas of Trentino, northern Italy.

Authors:  David Roiz; Markus Neteler; Cristina Castellani; Daniele Arnoldi; Annapaola Rizzoli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  West Nile fever--a reemerging mosquito-borne viral disease in Europe.

Authors:  Z Hubálek; J Halouzka
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 9.  Climate and dengue transmission: evidence and implications.

Authors:  Cory W Morin; Andrew C Comrie; Kacey Ernst
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Examining the relationship between infectious diseases and flooding in Europe: A systematic literature review and summary of possible public health interventions.

Authors:  Lisa Brown; Virginia Murray
Journal:  Disaster Health       Date:  2013-04-01
View more
  31 in total

1.  Efficacy of larvicides for the control of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya vectors in an urban cemetery in southern Mexico.

Authors:  Carlos F Marina; J Guillermo Bond; José Muñoz; Javier Valle; Humberto Quiroz-Martínez; Jorge A Torres-Monzón; Trevor Williams
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Travel distance and human movement predict paths of emergence and spatial spread of chikungunya in Thailand.

Authors:  S Chadsuthi; B M Althouse; S Iamsirithaworn; W Triampo; K H Grantz; D A T Cummings
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.434

3.  Climate and the Timing of Imported Cases as Determinants of the Dengue Outbreak in Guangzhou, 2014: Evidence from a Mathematical Model.

Authors:  Qu Cheng; Qinlong Jing; Robert C Spear; John M Marshall; Zhicong Yang; Peng Gong
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-02-10

4.  Molecular Virologic and Clinical Characteristics of a Chikungunya Fever Outbreak in La Romana, Dominican Republic, 2014.

Authors:  Rose M Langsjoen; Rebecca J Rubinstein; Tiffany F Kautz; Albert J Auguste; Jesse H Erasmus; Liddy Kiaty-Figueroa; Renessa Gerhardt; David Lin; Kumar L Hari; Ravi Jain; Nicolas Ruiz; Antonio E Muruato; Jael Silfa; Franklin Bido; Matthew Dacso; Scott C Weaver
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-12-28

5.  Efficacy of ULV and thermal aerosols of deltamethrin for control of Aedes albopictus in nice, France.

Authors:  Saïd C Boubidi; David Roiz; Marie Rossignol; Fabrice Chandre; Romain Benoit; Marc Raselli; Charles Tizon; Bernard Cadiou; Reda Tounsi; Christophe Lagneau; Didier Fontenille; Paul Reiter
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Improved detection of genus-specific Alphavirus using a generic TaqMan® assay.

Authors:  Claude Giry; Bénédicte Roquebert; Ghislaine Li-Pat-Yuen; Philippe Gasque; Marie-Christine Jaffar-Bandjee
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  Comprehensive proteome profiling in Aedes albopictus to decipher Wolbachia-arbovirus interference phenomenon.

Authors:  Yoann Saucereau; Claire Valiente Moro; Cindy Dieryckx; Jean-William Dupuy; Florence-Hélène Tran; Vincent Girard; Patrick Potier; Patrick Mavingui
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Chikungunya Beyond the Tropics: Where and When Do We Expect Disease Transmission in Europe?

Authors:  Nils Benjamin Tjaden; Yanchao Cheng; Carl Beierkuhnlein; Stephanie Margarete Thomas
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 5.048

9.  Mapping global environmental suitability for Zika virus.

Authors:  Jane P Messina; Moritz Ug Kraemer; Oliver J Brady; David M Pigott; Freya M Shearer; Daniel J Weiss; Nick Golding; Corrine W Ruktanonchai; Peter W Gething; Emily Cohn; John S Brownstein; Kamran Khan; Andrew J Tatem; Thomas Jaenisch; Christopher Jl Murray; Fatima Marinho; Thomas W Scott; Simon I Hay
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Spatial and Temporal Hot Spots of Aedes albopictus Abundance inside and outside a South European Metropolitan Area.

Authors:  Mattia Manica; Federico Filipponi; Antonello D'Alessandro; Alessia Screti; Markus Neteler; Roberto Rosà; Angelo Solimini; Alessandra Della Torre; Beniamino Caputo
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.