Literature DB >> 26078918

Robotic technology: Optimizing the outcomes in rectal cancer?

Nicolas C Buchs1.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive rectal resection remains a challenging procedure, even in experienced hands. Technical limitations explain at least in part the reasons of a relatively poor adoption of laparoscopy for rectal resection, in particular for low tumors in a deep and narrow pelvis. Robotics is intended to overcome these limitations. Potentially better short-term outcomes have been published: reduced conversion rates, better functional outcomes, shorter learning curve, reduction of positive margins, better specimen… However, robotic surgery has not yet taken over as the gold standard approach for low anterior resection. Several drawbacks might indeed discourage the most fervent surgeon: the size of the robot, the lack of tactile feedback, the risk and difficulties during multiquadrant surgery, and, of course, costs. Whilst new systems might overcome most of these drawbacks, it seems obvious that the development of robotic surgery is underway. Robotics is not just another interesting technical tool, but more a new concept, which should play a role in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Outcomes; Rectal cancer; Robot; Total mesorectal excision; Transanal endoscopic microsurgery; Transanal total mesorectal excision

Year:  2015        PMID: 26078918      PMCID: PMC4462681          DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v6.i3.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2218-4333


  16 in total

1.  Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D G Jayne; H C Thorpe; J Copeland; P Quirke; J M Brown; P J Guillou
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence.

Authors:  E H Aly
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Robotic transanal endoscopic microsurgery: technical details for the lateral approach.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; François Pugin; Francesco Volonte; Monika E Hagen; Philippe Morel; Frederic Ris
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery.

Authors:  Jeong Yeon Kim; Nam-Kyu Kim; Kang Young Lee; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Jang Hwan Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yongzhi Yang; Feng Wang; Peng Zhang; Chenzhang Shi; Yang Zou; Huanlong Qin; Yanlei Ma
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Marcos Gómez Ruiz; Ignacio Martín Parra; Carlos Manuel Palazuelos; Joaquin Alonso Martín; Carmen Cagigas Fernández; Julio Castillo Diego; Manuel Gómez Fleitas
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Seung Hyuk Baik; Hye Youn Kwon; Jin Soo Kim; Hyuk Hur; Seung Kook Sohn; Chang Hwan Cho; Hoguen Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes?

Authors:  Rosaria Scarpinata; Emad H Aly
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Eun Jung Park; Min Soo Cho; Se Jin Baek; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic versus robotic right colectomy: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Giampaolo Formisano; Pasquale Misitano; Giuseppe Giuliani; Giulia Calamati; Lucia Salvischiani; Paolo Pietro Bianchi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-03-18

2.  Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resections for rectal and rectosigmoid cancer: an institutional experience.

Authors:  Noel E Donlon; Tim S Nugent; Ross Free; Adnan Hafeez; Resa Kalbassi; Paul C Neary; Diarmuid S O'Riordain
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 3.  Robotic Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis.

Authors:  Marissa Anderson; Alexis Grucela
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2022-01-17

4.  Transanal total mesorectal excision: Myths and reality.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; Marta Penna; Alexander L Bloemendaal; Roel Hompes
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-10

Review 5.  Robotics in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Allison Weaver; Scott Steele
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-09-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.