Literature DB >> 26078390

PET/CT Improves the Definition of Complete Response and Allows to Detect Otherwise Unidentifiable Skeletal Progression in Multiple Myeloma.

Elena Zamagni1, Cristina Nanni2, Katia Mancuso3, Paola Tacchetti3, Annalisa Pezzi3, Lucia Pantani3, Beatrice Zannetti3, Ilaria Rambaldi2, Annamaria Brioli3, Serena Rocchi3, Carolina Terragna3, Marina Martello3, Giulia Marzocchi3, Enrica Borsi3, Ilaria Rizzello3, Stefano Fanti2, Michele Cavo3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in 282 symptomatic multiple myeloma patients treated up-front between 2002 and 2012. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: All patients were studied by PET/CT at baseline, during posttreatment follow-up, and at the time of relapse. Their median duration of follow-up was 67 months.
RESULTS: Forty-two percent of the patients at diagnosis had >3 focal lesions, and in 50% SUVmax was >4.2; extramedullary disease was present in 5%. On multivariate analysis, ISS stage 3, SUVmax >4.2, and failure to achieve best complete response (CR) were the leading factors independently associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). These 3 variables were used to construct a prognostic scoring system based on the number of risk factors. After treatment, PET/CT negativity (PET-neg) was observed in 70% of patients, whereas conventionally defined CR was achieved in 53%. Attainment of PET-neg favorably influenced PFS and OS. PET-neg was an independent predictor of prolonged PFS and OS for patients with conventionally defined CR. Sixty-three percent of patients experienced relapse or progression; in 12%, skeletal progression was exclusively detected by systematic PET/CT performed during follow-up. A multivariate analysis revealed that persistence of SUVmax >4.2 following first-line treatment was independently associated with exclusive PET/CT progression.
CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT combined with ISS stage and achievement or not of CR on first-line therapy sorted patients into different prognostic groups. PET/CT led to a more careful evaluation of CR. Finally, in patients with persistent high glucose metabolism after first-line treatment, PET/CT can be recommended during follow-up, to screen for otherwise unidentifiable progression. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26078390     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  38 in total

1.  18F-FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma: critical insights and future directions.

Authors:  Clément Bailly; Thomas Carlier; Bastien Jamet; Cyrille Touzeau; Philippe Moreau; Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré; Caroline Bodet-Milin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  PET/CT-Based Response Evaluation in Cancer-a Systematic Review of Design Issues.

Authors:  Oke Gerke; Karen Ehlers; Edith Motschall; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen; Werner Vach
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Baseline bone involvement in multiple myeloma - a prospective comparison of conventional X-ray, low-dose computed tomography, and 18flourodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in previously untreated patients.

Authors:  Maja Hinge; Kristian T Andersen; Thomas Lund; Henrik B Jørgensen; Paw C Holdgaard; Tina E Ormstrup; Lone L Østergaard; Torben Plesner
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Should minimal residual disease negativity not be the end point of myeloma therapy?

Authors:  Pieter Sonneveld
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-03-14

Review 5.  Role of FDG PET in the staging of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Joao R T Vicentini; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-04-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Imaging in myeloma with focus on advanced imaging techniques.

Authors:  Tara Barwick; Laure Bretsztajn; Kathryn Wallitt; Dimitri Amiras; Andrea Rockall; Christina Messiou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Functional and molecular MRI of the bone marrow in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Vassilis Koutoulidis; Nickolas Papanikolaou; Lia A Moulopoulos
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Treatment response evaluation with 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-NaF PET/CT in multiple myeloma patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; J Hillengass; H Goldschmidt; B Wagner; U Haberkorn; K Kopka; A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Oncologist perspective: role of imaging in myeloma.

Authors:  Yael N Shapiro; Elizabeth K O'Donnell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Minimal residual disease analysis in myeloma - when, why and where.

Authors:  Uday Yanamandra; Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2017-10-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.