Literature DB >> 26078206

Germline genome-editing research and its socioethical implications.

Tetsuya Ishii1.   

Abstract

Genetically modifying eggs, sperm, and zygotes ('germline' modification) can impact on the entire body of the resulting individual and on subsequent generations. With the advent of genome-editing technology, human germline gene modification is no longer theoretical. Owing to increasing concerns about human germline gene modification, a voluntary moratorium on human genome-editing research and/or the clinical application of human germline genome editing has recently been called for. However, whether such research should be suspended or encouraged warrants careful consideration. The present article reviews recent research on mammalian germline genome editing, discusses the importance of public dialogue on the socioethical implications of human germline genome-editing research, and considers the relevant guidelines and legislation in different countries.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; embryonic stem cells; ethics; genome engineering; germline genome editing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26078206     DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2015.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Mol Med        ISSN: 1471-4914            Impact factor:   11.951


  17 in total

1.  Attitudes of clinical geneticists and certified genetic counselors to genome editing and its clinical applications: A nation-wide questionnaire survey in Japan.

Authors:  Iku Taguchi; Takahiro Yamada; Rina Akaishi; Issei Imoto; Kenji Kurosawa; Kaname Nakatani; Fumio Nomura; Haruka Hamanoue; Maki Hyodo; Hiromi Murakami; Hiroshi Yoshihashi; Junko Yotsumoto; Shinji Kosugi
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.172

2.  The illusion of control in germline-engineering policy.

Authors:  Harald König
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  CRISPR-Cas9: A European position on genome editing.

Authors:  François Hirsch; Yves Lévy; Hervé Chneiweiss
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Islamic Perspectives on CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Human Germline Gene Editing: A Preliminary Discussion.

Authors:  Noor Munirah Isa; Nurul Atiqah Zulkifli; Saadan Man
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Attitudes of Members of Genetics Professional Societies Toward Human Gene Editing.

Authors:  Alyssa J Armsby; Yvonne Bombard; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Bonnie L Halpern-Felsher; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  CRISPR J       Date:  2019-10

Review 6.  Experimental methods to preserve male fertility and treat male factor infertility.

Authors:  Kathrin Gassei; Kyle E Orwig
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  The mucolipin-2 (TRPML2) ion channel: a tissue-specific protein crucial to normal cell function.

Authors:  Math P Cuajungco; Joshua Silva; Ania Habibi; Jessica A Valadez
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 8.  Spermatogonial stem cell autotransplantation and germline genomic editing: a future cure for spermatogenic failure and prevention of transmission of genomic diseases.

Authors:  Callista L Mulder; Yi Zheng; Sabrina Z Jan; Robert B Struijk; Sjoerd Repping; Geert Hamer; Ans M M van Pelt
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 9.  Gene Therapy 2017: Progress and Future Directions.

Authors:  A M Keeler; M K ElMallah; T R Flotte
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.689

10.  Disease Resistance and the Definition of Genetic Enhancement.

Authors:  Derek So; Erika Kleiderman; Seydina B Touré; Yann Joly
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.