Literature DB >> 26077963

Modern Incidence of Complete Heart Block in Patients with L-looped Ventricles: Does Univentricular Status Matter?

M Abigail Simmons1, Nancy Rollinson1, Steven Fishberger1, Li Qin2, John Fahey1, Robert W Elder3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Individuals with L-transposition of the great arteries and two normally sized ventricles are at risk for complete heart block. Little is known about the incidence of complete heart block in those with a single ventricle L-transposition of the great arteries. In this study, we compare the incidence of complete heart block in a modern cohort of patients with L-looped single ventricle anatomy to patients with L-transposition of the great arteries and two ventricles.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with L-transposition of the great arteries who were seen at Yale-New Haven Hospital between 2001 and 2013. Patients were classified as having isolated L-transposition of the great arteries (group I), L-transposition of the great arteries and major cardiac defects with two-ventricle anatomy (group II), or L-transposition of the great arteries and single ventricle anatomy (group III). We recorded the age of onset and the circumstances of CHB in each group. We calculated the incidence rate of complete heart block and compared this between the groups.
RESULTS: We identified 64 patients with L-transposition of the great arteries, median age of 21 years (range 6 months-52 years): 21 in group I, 15 in group II, and 28 in group III. In total, 15 subjects developed complete heart block, incidence of 21.9% and rate of 1.3% per person years. Although group III patients were significantly less likely to develop complete heart block than dual ventricle patients (7.1% vs. 33% and 40%, P = .01), this difference is not significant when only spontaneous complete heart block was analyzed (P = .16).
CONCLUSION: All patients with L-transposition of the great arteries have similar risk of spontaneous complete heart block and should be routinely screened for this complication.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrioventricular-ventriculoarterial Discordance; Complete AV Block; Complete Heart Block; Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries; L-transposition of the Great Arteries; Third Degree Heart Block

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26077963     DOI: 10.1111/chd.12279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis        ISSN: 1747-079X            Impact factor:   2.007


  4 in total

1.  Cardiac Arrhythmias in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Scope, Specific Problems, and Management.

Authors:  Ian Lindsay; Jeremy P Moore
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  The paradox of choice in the surgical management of congenitally corrected transposition: what should we do with all of these options supported by little evidence?

Authors:  Catherine Deshaies; Paul Khairy
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2018-01

Review 3.  Evaluation and management of bradycardia in neonates and children.

Authors:  Alban-Elouen Baruteau; James C Perry; Shubhayan Sanatani; Minoru Horie; Anne M Dubin
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 3.860

4.  Old but not forgotten: Creative use of abandoned epicardial leads after more than 2 decades.

Authors:  Kurt Bjorkman; Jude F Clancy; Robert W Elder
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2017-10-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.