Literature DB >> 26077333

The prevalence and impact of defensive medicine in the radiographic workup of the trauma patient: a pilot study.

Jennwood Chen1, Sarah Majercik2, Joseph Bledsoe2, Karen Connor2, Brad Morris2, Scott Gardner2, Casey Scully2, Emily Wilson2, Justin Dickerson2, Tom White2, Douglas Dillon2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Defensive medicine is estimated to cost the United States $210 billion annually. Trauma surgeons are at risk of practicing defensive medicine in the form of reflexively ordering computed tomography (CT) scans. The aim of this study is to quantify the monetary impact and radiation exposure related to the radiographic workup of trauma patients.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study involving 295 trauma patients at Level I trauma center. Physicians were surveyed regarding specific CT scans ordered, likelihood of significant injuries found on scans, and which scans would have been ordered in a hypothetical, litigation-free environment.
RESULTS: Four hundred sixteen of 1,097 CT scans (38%) were ordered out of defensive purposes. Nine CT scans (2.2%) that would not have been ordered resulted in a change in management. Defensively ordered CT scans resulted in nearly $120,000 in excess charges and 8.8 mSv of unnecessary radiation per patient.
CONCLUSION: Defensively ordered CT scan in the workup of trauma patients is a prevalent and costly practice that exposes patients to potentially unnecessary and harmful radiation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Defensive medicine; Healthcare costs; Healthcare reform; Radiation exposure; Trauma surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26077333     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  7 in total

1.  Defensive medicine and overutilization of imaging-an issue of radiation protection.

Authors:  Franz Kainberger
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Avoiding immediate whole-body trauma CT: a prospective observational study in stable trauma patients.

Authors:  Elisa Reitano; Stefano Granieri; Fabrizio Sammartano; Stefania Cimbanassi; Miriam Galati; Shailvi Gupta; Angelo Vanzulli; Osvaldo Chiara
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-01-10

3.  Renal lesion characterization: clinical utility of single-phase dual-energy CT compared to MRI and dual-phase single-energy CT.

Authors:  Ali Pourvaziri; Amirkasra Mojtahed; Peter F Hahn; Michael S Gee; Avinash Kambadakone; Dushyant V Sahani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 4.  Factors associated with imaging overuse in the emergency department: A systematic review.

Authors:  Monica Tung; Ritu Sharma; Jeremiah S Hinson; Stephanie Nothelle; Jean Pannikottu; Jodi B Segal
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.469

5.  Education and training as a strategy to improve justification of medical imaging referrals in emergency departments.

Authors:  Cláudia Sá Dos Reis; Colleen Bennett; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2018-09

6.  A Qualitative Analysis of Malpractice Litigation in Cardiology Using Case Summaries Through a National Legal Database Analysis.

Authors:  Richa Patel; Nicole Rynecki; Eric Eidelman; Spandana Maddukuri; Varun Ayyaswami; Manthan Patel; Raghav Gupta; Arpan V Prabhu; Jared Magnani
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-07-28

7.  How defensive medicine is defined in European medical literature: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nathalie Baungaard; Pia Ladeby Skovvang; Elisabeth Assing Hvidt; Helle Gerbild; Merethe Kirstine Andersen; Jesper Lykkegaard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.