Keith T Flaherty1, Judith B Manola2, Michael Pins2, David F McDermott2, Michael B Atkins2, Janice J Dutcher2, Daniel J George2, Kim A Margolin2, Robert S DiPaola2. 1. Keith T. Flaherty, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Judith B. Manola, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; David F. McDermott and Michael B. Atkins, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Michael Pins, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL; Janice J. Dutcher, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Daniel J. George, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Kim A. Margolin, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and Robert S. DiPaola, Cancer Institute of New Jersey at Hamilton, New Brunswick, NJ. kflaherty@partners.org. 2. Keith T. Flaherty, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Judith B. Manola, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; David F. McDermott and Michael B. Atkins, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Michael Pins, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL; Janice J. Dutcher, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Daniel J. George, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Kim A. Margolin, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and Robert S. DiPaola, Cancer Institute of New Jersey at Hamilton, New Brunswick, NJ.
Abstract
PURPOSE: On the basis of evidence that resistance to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor inhibition is caused by hypoxia-driven residual VEGF and other proangiogenic factors, combinations of agents from these classes were hypothesized to improve treatment outcomes relative to single-agent VEGF pathway blockade. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 361 patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma were randomly assigned equally to arm A (bevacizumab monotherapy 10 mg/kg intravenously [IV] every 2 weeks), B (bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks and temsirolimus 25 mg IV every week), C (bevacizumab 5 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks and sorafenib 200 mg orally twice daily on days 1 to 5, 8 to 12, 15 to 19, and 22 to 26), or D (sorafenib 200 mg twice daily and temsirolimus 25 mg IV weekly). Progression-free survival was the primary end point. RESULTS: Among 331 eligible treated patients, median PFS was 7.5 months for bevacizumab alone (90% CI, 5.8 to 10.8 months), 7.6 months for bevacizumab plus temsirolimus (90% CI, 6.7 to 9.2 months), 9.2 months for bevacizumab plus sorafenib (90% CI, 7.5 to 11.4 months), and 7.4 months for sorafenib plus temsirolimus (90% CI, 5.6 to 7.9 months). Hazard ratios from stratified Cox proportional hazards models were 1.01, 0.89, and 1.07 (with respective P values of .95, .49, and .68) for the three combinations, respectively, compared with bevacizumab alone. Adverse events did not differ significantly among treatment arms. CONCLUSION: The activity of sorafenib, temsirolimus, and bevacizumab administered in doublet combinations did not significantly improve median progression-free survival in comparison with bevacizumab monotherapy.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: On the basis of evidence that resistance to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor inhibition is caused by hypoxia-driven residual VEGF and other proangiogenic factors, combinations of agents from these classes were hypothesized to improve treatment outcomes relative to single-agent VEGF pathway blockade. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 361 patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma were randomly assigned equally to arm A (bevacizumab monotherapy 10 mg/kg intravenously [IV] every 2 weeks), B (bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks and temsirolimus 25 mg IV every week), C (bevacizumab 5 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks and sorafenib 200 mg orally twice daily on days 1 to 5, 8 to 12, 15 to 19, and 22 to 26), or D (sorafenib 200 mg twice daily and temsirolimus 25 mg IV weekly). Progression-free survival was the primary end point. RESULTS: Among 331 eligible treated patients, median PFS was 7.5 months for bevacizumab alone (90% CI, 5.8 to 10.8 months), 7.6 months for bevacizumab plus temsirolimus (90% CI, 6.7 to 9.2 months), 9.2 months for bevacizumab plus sorafenib (90% CI, 7.5 to 11.4 months), and 7.4 months for sorafenib plus temsirolimus (90% CI, 5.6 to 7.9 months). Hazard ratios from stratified Cox proportional hazards models were 1.01, 0.89, and 1.07 (with respective P values of .95, .49, and .68) for the three combinations, respectively, compared with bevacizumab alone. Adverse events did not differ significantly among treatment arms. CONCLUSION: The activity of sorafenib, temsirolimus, and bevacizumab administered in doublet combinations did not significantly improve median progression-free survival in comparison with bevacizumab monotherapy.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Bernard Escudier; Tim Eisen; Walter M Stadler; Cezary Szczylik; Stéphane Oudard; Michael Siebels; Sylvie Negrier; Christine Chevreau; Ewa Solska; Apurva A Desai; Frédéric Rolland; Tomasz Demkow; Thomas E Hutson; Martin Gore; Scott Freeman; Brian Schwartz; Minghua Shan; Ronit Simantov; Ronald M Bukowski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Thomas E Hutson; Piotr Tomczak; M Dror Michaelson; Ronald M Bukowski; Olivier Rixe; Stéphane Oudard; Sylvie Negrier; Cezary Szczylik; Sindy T Kim; Isan Chen; Paul W Bycott; Charles M Baum; Robert A Figlin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anat Norden-Zfoni; Jayesh Desai; Judith Manola; Paul Beaudry; Jeremy Force; Robert Maki; Judah Folkman; Carlo Bello; Charles Baum; Sam E DePrimo; David R Shalinsky; Goerge D Demetri; John V Heymach Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Christine C Hudson; Mei Liu; Gary G Chiang; Diane M Otterness; Dawn C Loomis; Fiona Kaper; Amato J Giaccia; Robert T Abraham Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: J R Gnarra; S Zhou; M J Merrill; J R Wagner; A Krumm; E Papavassiliou; E H Oldfield; R D Klausner; W M Linehan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1996-10-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: D I Gabrilovich; H L Chen; K R Girgis; H T Cunningham; G M Meny; S Nadaf; D Kavanaugh; D P Carbone Journal: Nat Med Date: 1996-10 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: James C Yang; Leah Haworth; Richard M Sherry; Patrick Hwu; Douglas J Schwartzentruber; Suzanne L Topalian; Seth M Steinberg; Helen X Chen; Steven A Rosenberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-07-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: B R Seizinger; G A Rouleau; L J Ozelius; A H Lane; G E Farmer; J M Lamiell; J Haines; J W Yuen; D Collins; D Majoor-Krakauer Journal: Nature Date: 1988-03-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: David Schiff; Kurt A Jaeckle; S Keith Anderson; Evanthia Galanis; Caterina Giannini; Jan C Buckner; Phillip Stella; Patrick J Flynn; Bradley J Erickson; John F Schwerkoske; Vesna Kaluza; Erin Twohy; Janet Dancey; John Wright; Jann N Sarkaria Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: I Duran; J Lambea; P Maroto; J L González-Larriba; Luis Flores; S Granados-Principal; M Graupera; B Sáez; A Vivancos; O Casanovas Journal: Target Oncol Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 4.493
Authors: Che-Kai Tsao; Bobby Liaw; Catherine He; Matthew D Galsky; John Sfakianos; William K Oh Journal: Ther Adv Med Oncol Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 8.168
Authors: Brian M Shinder; Adam Shupe; Geun Taek Lee; Mark N Stein; Isaac Y Kim; Eric A Singer Journal: Transl Cancer Res Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 1.241