Literature DB >> 26077155

Tip-multi-breaking in Capillary Microfluidic Devices.

Pingan Zhu1, Tiantian Kong1, Zhanxiao Kang1, Xiaowei Tian1, Liqiu Wang1.   

Abstract

We report tip-multi-breaking (TMB) mode of droplet breakup in capillary microfluidic devices. This new mode appears in a region embraced by Cai = 0 and lg(Cai) = -8.371(Ca0) -7.36 with Ca0 varying from 0.35 to 0.63 on the Cai - Ca0 phase diagram, Cai and Ca0 being the capillary numbers of inner and outer fluids, respectively. The mode is featured with a periodic, constant-speed thinning of the inner liquid tip and periodic formation of a sequence of droplets. The droplet number n in a sequence is determined by and increases with outer phase capillary number, and varies from two to over ten. The distribution of both pinch-off time and size of the droplets in a sequence is a geometric progression of common ratio that depends exclusively on and increases monotonically with the droplet number from its minimum value of 0.5 at n = 2 to its maximum value of 1 as n tends to infinity. These features can help identify the unique geometric morphology of droplet clusters and make them promising candidates for encryption and anti-fake identification.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26077155      PMCID: PMC4468424          DOI: 10.1038/srep11102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Emulsions are useful in a wide range of applications, particularly when the droplet size is fine and uniform123. Many personal care products, foods and pharmaceutical products are emulsion-based, and emulsions have been proposed for arterial injection chemotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma4, for single-molecule polymerase chain reaction (PCR)5, for screening of biological and synthetic compounds6 and for decontamination of surfaces infected by bacteria or bioterror agents7. Emulsification methods are plentiful18, but most involve mixing two liquids in bulk processes, and many use turbulence to enhance the formation of dispersions. In these “top-down” approaches , little control over the formation of individual droplets is available, and a broad distribution of size is typically produced9. In an attempt to produce monodisperse emulsions, “bottom-up” microfluidic approaches— microchannel-terrace10111213, co-flow14, flow-focusing151617, T-junction1819202122, and capillary devices232425, —have been recently proposed for fabricating emulsions at the level of individual droplets. All these microfluidic approaches involve the injection of one immiscible fluid into another, and operate in the laminar flow region and generate one droplet at a time. As the conditions for break-off are identical for every droplet, the emulsions fabricated by these approaches are highly monodisperse, with standard derivations in droplet size less than 5% for microchannel-terrace approach and even 2% for the others. Introduction of one immiscible fluid into another normally leads to the formation of either droplets or a continuous jet. This comes from the Rayleigh-Plateau instability, the inner or dispersed fluid becoming unstable because of surface tension force seeking to minimize the interfacial area according to the thermodynamic principle of minimum interfacial energy. Viscous and inertial forces counteract to this action via suppressing the growth of jet deformations that lead to pinch-off and promoting the formation of a long fluid thread, respectively. It is the balance of these forces that determines droplet breakup modes for a given set of conditions arising from flow rates of the two immiscible fluids, their viscosities, densities and interfacial tension, surface wettability and device geometry. In a capillary microfluidic device (Fig. 1(a)), three modes have previously been observed25: geometry-controlled mode where the dimensions of the focusing orifice control the pinch-off of droplets, dripping mode with which the inner fluid finger narrows because of viscous shear force from the outer fluid, and the resulting droplet sizes are somewhat smaller than the orifice dimension, and jetting mode where a long viscous jet forms and finally breaks into droplets due to Rayleigh-Plateau instability. However, fundamental questions like whether other modes exist and how they progress as governing parameters vary remain largely unaddressed.
Figure 1

Experimental setup.

(a) The location of injecting and focusing orifice. D and D are the inner diameters of the injecting and focusing orifice, respectively, with the distance between them being L. Scale bar, 200 μm. (b) Experimental setup. Fluids are driven by Syringe pumps. The right hand side needle is open before experiments, through which air and liquid wastes can be flushed away, while it is sealed during experiments. The process is visualized, monitored and recorded (in terms of images and videos) with a high speed digital imaging system equipped with an inverted microscope.

We report a new mode named “tip-multi-breaking” (TMB) in which the dispersed liquid tip breaks up repeatedly into several droplets once a time, and tipstreaming mode that have been observed in the other microfluidic systems on top of the three reported geometry-controlled, dripping and jetting modes in the capillary microfluidic device, as shown in Fig. 1(a). Although droplets generated with this TMB mode are polydisperse, the sizes of droplets in a cluster obey a regular distribution of geometric progression. Even more remarkably, the number of droplets in a cluster has a specific relationship to the common ratio of the progression. These features can help identify the unique geometric morphology of droplet clusters and make them promising candidates for encryption and anti-fake identification. We also examine the transition between modes via systematically varying the dispersed and continuous phase capillary numbers that characterize the balance between local viscous shear forces and capillary pressure. The relative dominance of fluid inertia to capillary pressure is characterized by the dimensionless Weber number. At the micrometer length scale, however, fluid inertia is often negligible compared with interfacial and viscous effects.

Experiments and Results

In our experiments, water-in-oil emulsion is synthesized in a capillary microfluidic device made by co-axially aligning of two cylindrical glass capillaries in a square glass capillary (Fig. 1(a)), similar to the one used by Utada et al.23 Cylindrical capillary is tapered to form injecting and focusing orifices. The system geometrical dimensions are: D = 199.15 μm, L = 266.67 μm. Figure 1(b) shows the system and the process. The continuous phase is silicone oil (viscosity, 881.02 mPa s); the dispersed phase is an aqueous mixture (viscosity, 19.07 mPa s) of 70 wt.% glycerol and 30 wt.% distilled water. The interfacial tension between two phases is γ = 30.07 mN m−1. The viscosity and interfacial tension are measured by a viscometer (microVISCTM, RHEOSENSE, INC.) and a ring tensiometer (Surface Tensiometer 20, Cole-Parmer), respectively. Using high-precision syringe pumps, these two fluids are forced to flow through the capillary microfluidic system. Flow rates are controlled and measured by the syringe pumps. The flow focusing in the microfluidic system accurately generates droplets at the focusing orifice of the output channel of the capillary microfluidic system, which allows droplets to vent to the collecting container at atmosphere pressure with the continuous fluid. All connections between the syringes and the microfluidic system and between the microfluidic system and the collecting container are via polyethylene microtubing. The droplet breakup process is visualized, monitored and recorded (in terms of images and videos) with a high speed digital imaging system equipped with an inverted microscope [high-speed camera (MotionPro® X4, IDT, Taiwan) mounted on a long distance microscope (XD101, Nanjing Jiangnan Novel Optics Co. Ltd) via a C-mount coupler]. We calculate outer and inner phase capillary numbers as , and , with η, Q, D, and γ being dynamic viscosity, volume flow rate, inner diameter of the focusing orifice, and interfacial tension, respectively. Subscripts “o” and “i” represent outer and inner phases, respectively. By systematically varying Ca and Ca, we observe five modes of droplet breakup: geometry-controlled, dripping, jetting, tipstreaming and tip-multi-breaking, Fig. 2. Of them, the dripping mode has been observed at Ca = 1.044, Ca = 3.43 × 10−3,24 and Ca = 0.159, Ca = 9.4 × 10−4,25, respectively (Fig. 2). At Ca = 0.159, Ca = 9.4 × 10−4, but with a larger L value, the droplet breakup has been reported to transfer into the geometry-controlled mode25, showing the significance of system geometry. The jetting mode was also observed by Benson et al. when the surfactant is added to the outer fluids25. To our best knowledge, this is the first report of the tipstreaming mode in capillary device, which was previously observed in PDMS-based flow-focusing microfluidic systems1516. Fig. 3(a) typifies these four modes from our experiments (Supplementary Movie S1). Droplets generated with geometry-controlled, dripping and tipstreaming mode are uniform, but polydisperse with jetting. With tipstreaming mode, submicron droplets can be generated at the pointed end of inner liquid tip even using a geometrical orifice of a few hundred microns in flow-focusing system1516. The readers are referred to literature162627 for the excellent discussion on features of these four modes known in microfluidic droplet systems and contrasts among them.
Figure 2

Cai–Cao phase diagram.

Square represents jetting, circle geometry-controlled, triangle dripping, star tipstreaming, and diamond tip-multi-breaking. Results in non-filled symbols are from our experiments; those in filled ones are from literature2425. The variation of the present results from those in the literature2425 shows the significant influence of device geometry. Solid lines are boundaries of transitions between different modes. Inset: transition boundaries among dripping, jetting and TMB in a log-log plane.

Figure 3

Five modes of droplet breakup.

(a) Snapshots of four already known modes. Geometry-controlled (a1) at Ca = 0.026 and Ca = 0.0078, dripping (a2) at Ca = 0.26 and Ca = 0.0039, jetting (a3) at Ca = 0.52 and Ca = 0.0113, and tipstreaming (a4) at Ca = 0.62 and Ca = 9.8 × 10−5. (b) Tip-multi-breaking mode generates drop sequences with different droplet number that increases with outer phase capillary number Ca with Ca = 2.3 × 10−4, 9.1 × 10−5, 7.2 × 10−5, 4.3 × 10−5, 3.1 × 10−5, 1.9 × 10−5, 1.1 × 10−5, 2.5 × 10−6 for (b1-b8), respectively. (c) Periodic breakup process exampled by the formation of a 3-droplet sequence. (c1) Inner tip penetrates into focusing orifice, (c2-c3) thinning-tip multi-breaks into three droplets, and (c4) inner liquid tip retracts. d denotes the diameter of the tip at the focusing orifice. (d) Schematic (d1) and snapshot (d2) of a circumscribed cone of apex angle 2θ that encloses all the droplets tangentially when they are lined adjacently in a descending order. Scale bars, 200 μm.

Tip-multi-breaking is a periodic mode and generates a sequence of droplets one by one in each period. The droplet number n in a sequence varies from two to over ten depending on and increasing with the outer phase capillary number Ca (Fig. 3(b)). The size of droplets in a sequence, beautifully, decreases monotonically in a geometric progression with common ratio smaller than unity. The details of droplet formation with this new mode are available in Supplementary Movie S2. The liquid-liquid interface upstream of the focusing orifice penetrates into the orifice due to the pressure drop along the longitudinal axis of the device. The tip proceeds through the orifice and grows into a thread of more or less mushroom shape. The growing thread displaces and pushes away the outer liquid in the outlet channel, thereby increasing the viscous shear force from the outer liquid and elongating the thread. The thread is thermodynamically unstable due to the high surface energy of this configuration, and breaks into a sequence of n droplets one by one with their size decreasing in a geometric progression. During the period of n droplets pinch-off, the inner liquid tip stays in the orifice and keeps thinning radially in diameter until it breaks and releases the last droplet, which results in the descending size distribution of the n droplets. After the last breakup, the tip retracts upstream from the focusing orifice and the process is repeated. The whole droplet breakup process is exampled by a 3-droplet sequence in Fig. 3(c). As inertial forces are negligible compared with viscous forces at micro-length scale, fluid flow is Stokes flow in microfluidic devices. Both simulations and experiments have confirmed that drop pinch-off is featured with a constant velocity of neck radius thinning in Stokes flow regime2829. Therefore, both the tip and the thread neck radius could be assumed to be a linear function of time so that the pinching time t of the i droplet in the sequence can be proved to obey a geometric progression (see “Confirmation of R as geometric progression” in supplementary information for the detailed proof):subjected to two more assumptions: the zero tip radius after the last droplet pinches off, and uniform fluid velocity v over the cross plane of the tip radius. In equation (1), v = |dR/dt| is the speed of tip radius thinning where R is tip radius (Fig. 3(c1)), and v is the pinch-off velocity perpendicular to the interface leading to thread breakup due to Rayleigh-Plateau instability232829, which depends on fluid properties in the form of 3031. Here depends exclusively on the viscosity ratio η/η3031. According to mass conservation, the volume of i droplet is equal to the integral of inner flow rate through the cross section of the thinning tip over the pinching time t, so , where is the initial radius of the tip before the pinch-off of the first droplet. Thereby R ∝ t, and R is in the form of,in which R is the radius of i droplet, andThe predicted R from equation (2) is compared with experimental data in Fig. 4(a), confirming the accuracy of equation (2). Here we measure R and count n by analyzing the captured images with ImageJ. The slope of the fitted line in Fig. 4(a) is proportional to . The more droplets assemble in one sequence, the larger value the slope becomes. Hence the common ratio a increases with droplet number n.
Figure 4

Experimental confirmation of equations (2), (4) and (7).

(a) Experimental verification of droplet sizes obeying the rule of geometric progression. The slope of the fitted line increases with the number of droplets, indicating the common ratio of multi-droplet sequence increases with droplet number. (b) Common ratio a versus droplet number n. Red circle represents Case 1, blue diamond Case 2, olive triangle Case 3, and orange star Case 4 (Supplementary Table S2). The first three cases are W/O emulsions, the last one is O/W emulsion. Inset: angle θ versus droplet number n. (c) sin−1θ as a linear function of with data from Case 1.

The change of tip radius up to time instant t during the pinch-off of the n droplets is given by the product of breakup velocity and time t. By assuming the tip radius becomes zero after the formation of the last droplet, we can estimate the correlation between common ratio a and the droplet number n as follows (see “Determining the correlation between θ and n” in supplementary information):which is independent of parameters arising from fluid properties and device geometry. We confirm this in Fig. 4(b) by measuring a and n with different liquids and device dimensions listed in Supplementary Table S2, showing an excellent agreement between equation (4) and experimental data. Therefore the common ratio a is fixed by the droplet number exclusively. Based on equation (4), the minimum value of a is 0.5 and occurs at n = 2. Therefore, the radius of any droplet in the sequence would never be larger than the twice of that of its smaller neighbor or smaller than the half of that of its bigger neighbor. Multi-droplet sequences with different droplet number are similar to each other in the geometric morphology, but can be distinguished exclusively by the correlation between n and a. When such droplet sequences are encapsulated into shell droplets or fibers, their number and size distribution can serve as the marker of the encoded shell droplets or fibers, a unique identifier different from those proposed in the literature for encryption and anti-fake identification3233. As geometric progression of both pinch-off time and droplet size in any droplet sequence comes from the constant speed of tip radius thinning and has been experimentally confirmed (Fig. 4(a)), we can thus introduce a circumscribed cone with apex angle 2θ to embrace all the droplets in the sequence (Fig. 3(d)). A straightforward derivation yields,By equations (4) and (5), we havewhich shows that sinθ ≤ 1/3 when n ≥ 2. Therefore 0° < θ ≤ arcsin(1/3) ≈ 20° with tip-multi-breaking mode. Equation (6) is confirmed in the inset of Fig. 4(b). By equations (3) and (5), we haveWhen the pinch-off velocity v = 0, the effect of Rayleigh-Plateau instability on the thread breakup vanishes, and the droplet is generated by the tip breakup one by one. This corresponds to dripping with sinθ = 1 and θ = 90°. When v = 0, R is constant. We thus recover the jetting mode with sinθ = 0 and θ = 0° if v ≠ 0. When neither v nor v is zero, we have the tip-multi-breaking mode with 0° < θ < 90°. Therefore the θ-value can be used to distinguish dripping, jetting and tip-multi-breaking. Note that the difference between the last two is mainly on that R keeps constant in jetting, but thinning with a constant speed in tip-multi-breaking. Measuring and θ by analyzing the captured images with ImageJ and calculating the total breakup time t via the captured videos, we can calculate . Figure 4(c) shows the experimental results of sin−1θ as a linear function of , in which all the measured values of sin−1θ lie closely to the prediction from equation (7) with the droplet number from two to nine, showing a good agreement. The location of the tip-multi-breaking mode and the transitions between the modes are shown in the Ca–Ca phase diagram (Fig. 2). Tip-multi-breaking appears in a region formed and enveloped by a curve (inset in Fig. 2) as an upper boundary, and three straight lines Ca = 0, Ca = 0.35, and Ca = 0.63 as the lower, left and right boundary, respectively. In experiments, we observe transitions between modes by decreasing Ca for any fixed value of Ca. The mode transfers into another in different orders for different outer phase capillary numbers. As Ca decreases, the breakup mode shifts from jetting to geometry-controlled when Ca < 0.1, from jetting to dripping when 0.1 < Ca < 0.35, from jetting to dripping and then tip-multi-breaking when 0.35 < Ca < 0.5, from jetting to dripping, tipstreaming and tip-multi-breaking when0.5 < Ca < 0.6, and from jetting to tipstreaming and then tip-multi-breaking when 0.6 < Ca < 0.63. As Ca arrives at 0.5, transition from jetting to tipstreaming is observed at Ca about 2 × 10−4, indicating a sufficiently low inner flow rate. Although tipstreaming reported previously are mainly surfactant mediated1516, both experimental and numerical studies suggested that it can also occur in the absence of surfactant343536, so does in our experiments.

Concluding Remarks

To summarize, the pressure drop along the longitudinal axis of the device forces the liquid-liquid interface into the focusing orifice. Depending on values of Ca and Ca, the tip breaks up into droplets in five modes, with their appearance domain and transition shown in Fig. 2: geometry-controlled, dripping, jetting, tipstreaming and tip-multi-breaking. The last is observed for the first time, and is characterized by a periodic, constant-speed thinning of inner tip radius, and thus generates periodically a sequence of n droplets (n ≥ 2) with their pinch-off times and sizes satisfying a geometric progression of common ratio a. The droplet number n in a sequence is determined by and increases with outer phase capillary number Ca. The common ratio a depends exclusively on and increases monotonically with n from its minimum value of 0.5 at n = 2 to its maximum values of 1 as n tends to infinity. While this new droplet breakup mode is observed in capillary microfluidic devices at present work, it is believed to be a basic mode that could appear in other microfluidic systems such as flow-focusing systems as well.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Zhu, P. et al. Tip-multi-breaking in Capillary Microfluidic Devices. Sci. Rep. 5, 11102; doi: 10.1038/srep11102 (2015).
  13 in total

1.  Dynamic pattern formation in a vesicle-generating microfluidic device.

Authors:  T Thorsen; R W Roberts; F H Arnold; S R Quake
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2001-04-30       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Chemical transformations in individual ultrasmall biomimetic containers.

Authors:  D T Chiu; C F Wilson; F Ryttsén; A Strömberg; C Farre; A Karlsson; S Nordholm; A Gaggar; B P Modi; A Moscho; R A Garza-López; O Orwar; R N Zare
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Controlled generation of submicron emulsion droplets via highly stable tip-streaming mode in microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Woong-Chan Jeong; Jong-Min Lim; Jae-Hoon Choi; Jong-Hoon Kim; You-Jin Lee; Seung-Hyun Kim; Gaehang Lee; Jong-Duk Kim; Gi-Ra Yi; Seung-Man Yang
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Single-molecule PCR using water-in-oil emulsion.

Authors:  Michihiko Nakano; Jun Komatsu; Shun-ichi Matsuura; Kazunori Takashima; Shinji Katsura; Akira Mizuno
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Droplet formation in a microchannel network.

Authors:  Takasi Nisisako; Toru Torii; Toshiro Higuchi
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2002-01-18       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Monodisperse double emulsions generated from a microcapillary device.

Authors:  A S Utada; E Lorenceau; D R Link; P D Kaplan; H A Stone; D A Weitz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  An "off-the-shelf" capillary microfluidic device that enables tuning of the droplet breakup regime at constant flow rates.

Authors:  Bryan R Benson; Howard A Stone; Robert K Prud'homme
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  Flexible fabrication of biomimetic bamboo-like hybrid microfibers.

Authors:  Yue Yu; Hui Wen; Jingyun Ma; Simon Lykkemark; Hui Xu; Jianhua Qin
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 30.849

9.  A novel surfactant nanoemulsion with broad-spectrum sporicidal activity against Bacillus species.

Authors:  T Hamouda; M M Hayes; Z Cao; R Tonda; K Johnson; D C Wright; J Brisker; J R Baker
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Arterial-injection chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma using monodispersed poppy-seed oil microdroplets containing fine aqueous vesicles of epirubicin. Initial medical application of a membrane-emulsification technique.

Authors:  S Higashi; M Shimizu; T Nakashima; K Iwata; F Uchiyama; S Tateno; S Tamura; T Setoguchi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Microfluidic fabrication of microparticles for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Wen Li; Liyuan Zhang; Xuehui Ge; Biyi Xu; Weixia Zhang; Liangliang Qu; Chang-Hyung Choi; Jianhong Xu; Afang Zhang; Hyomin Lee; David A Weitz
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  Droplet Breakup in Expansion-contraction Microchannels.

Authors:  Pingan Zhu; Tiantian Kong; Leyan Lei; Xiaowei Tian; Zhanxiao Kang; Liqiu Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Well-defined porous membranes for robust omniphobic surfaces via microfluidic emulsion templating.

Authors:  Pingan Zhu; Tiantian Kong; Xin Tang; Liqiu Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Microfluidic droplet generation based on non-embedded co-flow-focusing using 3D printed nozzle.

Authors:  Adrien Dewandre; Javier Rivero-Rodriguez; Youen Vitry; Benjamin Sobac; Benoit Scheid
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Enhanced single-cell encapsulation in microfluidic devices: From droplet generation to single-cell analysis.

Authors:  Si Da Ling; Yuhao Geng; An Chen; Yanan Du; Jianhong Xu
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 2.800

6.  Pinch-off of microfluidic droplets with oscillatory velocity of inner phase flow.

Authors:  Pingan Zhu; Xin Tang; Ye Tian; Liqiu Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Highly Efficient Thermoresponsive Nanocomposite for Controlled Release Applications.

Authors:  Omar Yassine; Amir Zaher; Er Qiang Li; Ahmed Alfadhel; Jose E Perez; Mincho Kavaldzhiev; Maria F Contreras; Sigurdur T Thoroddsen; Niveen M Khashab; Jurgen Kosel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Large-scale water collection of bioinspired cavity-microfibers.

Authors:  Ye Tian; Pingan Zhu; Xin Tang; Chunmei Zhou; Jianmei Wang; Tiantian Kong; Min Xu; Liqiu Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.