The pressure-temperature phase diagram of ice displays a perplexing variety of structurally distinct phases. In the century-long history of scientific research on ice, the proton-ordered ice phases numbered XIII through XV were discovered only recently. Despite considerable effort, none of the transitions leading from the low-temperature ordered ices VIII, IX, XI, XIII, XIV and XV to their high-temperature disordered counterparts were experimentally found to display the full Pauling entropy. Here we report calorimetric measurements on suitably high-pressure-treated, hydrogen chloride-doped ice XIV that demonstrate just this at the transition to ice XII. Dielectric spectroscopy on undoped and on variously doped ice XII crystals reveals that addition of hydrogen chloride, the agent triggering complete proton order in ice XIV, enhances the precursor dynamics strongest. These discoveries provide new insights into the puzzling observation that different dopants trigger the formation of different proton-ordered ice phases.
The pressure-temperature phase diagram of ice displays a perplexing variety of structurally distinct phases. In the century-long history of scientific research on ice, the proton-ordered ice phases numbered XIII through XV were discovered only recently. Despite considerable effort, none of the transitions leading from the low-temperature ordered ices VIII, IX, XI, XIII, XIV and XV to their high-temperature disordered counterparts were experimentally found to display the full Pauling entropy. Here we report calorimetric measurements on suitably high-pressure-treated, hydrogen chloride-doped ice XIV that demonstrate just this at the transition to ice XII. Dielectric spectroscopy on undoped and on variously doped ice XII crystals reveals that addition of hydrogen chloride, the agent triggering complete proton order in ice XIV, enhances the precursor dynamics strongest. These discoveries provide new insights into the puzzling observation that different dopants trigger the formation of different proton-ordered ice phases.
Symmetry breaking order–disorder transitions are ubiquitous and of importance in
fields as diverse as physics, chemistry and mathematics. Quite often, the
low-temperature ordered phase cannot be accessed because of geometrical frustration and
therefore residual entropy remains even at the absolute zero. One of the first examples
of residual entropy was pointed out by Pauling to describe waterice1.
With the exceptions of cubic ice (ice Ic), ice II, ice IV and ice XVI, all
H2Oice phases are known to form proton disorder/order pairs, that is,
ice Ih and XI (with ice Ih designating the naturally occurring
hexagonal ice), ice III and IX, ice V and XIII, ice VI and XV, ice VII and VIII, as well
as ice XII and XIV (refs 2, 3,
4, 5, 6). The degree of proton order on their lattices is accessible using, for
example, diffraction and calorimetric techniques. After refinement of diffraction data
one obtains fractional occupancies of H atoms in a given unit cell, which represent
space/time averages of the configurations sampled during the measurement. This provides
information about the degree of order in a static structure, but does not allow one to
quantify entropy changes associated with a phase transition. In addition, neutron
diffraction requires the use of deuterated samples, which may show a different degree of
(dis)order than hydrogenated specimens. By contrast, in calorimetry the latent heat of
transformation, ΔH, associated with the proton-(dis)ordering transition can
be determined directly and the onset temperature, Tc, of latent heat
evolution yields the phase equilibrium between ordered and disordered phases. The
entropy change, ΔS=ΔH/Tc, at the
order/disorder transition can be quantified and compared with its theoretical
maximum—given (approximately) by the Pauling entropy,
ΔSP=R ln(3/2) (refs 1, 7, 8, 9)—which is slightly dependent on the topology of the
oxygen network10. Pauling’s entropy was found to be of relevance
not only in the physics of waterice but also for magnetic spin ice pyrochlores such as
Dy2Ti2O7 (ref. 11).
However, for many of the ‘ordered’ waterice crystals such as ice IX (refs
12, 13), ice XI (ref.
14) or ice XIV (ref. 3),
the reported degree of order is incomplete. Calculations based on the assumption that
ice III is fully disordered suggest that ice IX is fully ordered, see ref. 13. However, this assumption is at variance with experimental
evidence, see refs 13, 16,
17. Likewise, the degree of disorder is not 100%
for the ‘disordered’ forms, except for phases whose space group requires
full proton disorder (for example, ice VI and ice XII (ref. 6)). Partial proton order is already present, for example, in the
disorderedice phases III and V where, for certain hydrogen bonds, the probability of a
proton to be located either on one side or the other displays some fractional value151617. As a consequence, no more than 66% of the Pauling
entropy were calorimetrically detected at the ice XIII→V disordering
transition18 in spite of ice XIII showing only a small degree of
residual disorder according to neutron diffraction2.The proton-ordered phases displaying a near-maximum order parameter seem to be the ones
most abundantly investigated. Dielectric studies indicate that 83% of the maximum
proton order was achieved (91% for deuterated crystals) in iceVIII (ref.
19), whereas neutron diffraction indicates iceVIII to
be even completely ordered at ∼2.5 GPa and 10 K2021,
and ice VII to be completely disordered at 295 K1922. The exact
nature of the transition between ice VII to VIII and the release of the Pauling entropy
at the transition remain unclear. Kuhs et al.20 measured in the
vicinity of the phase transition and concluded that ‘further data on both phases
just above and just below the transition temperature will be required to establish
higher limits on possible disordering of iceVIII at high temperature and ordering of
ice VII at low temperature’. Nelmes et al.23 concluded that
‘the structure of ice VII is significantly different from previous interpretations
and is more complex’. Intermediate phases with frozen-in disorder such as ice
VII’ (ref. 24) and evidence for a transition in ice
VII involving changes in the character of the proton order/disorder were discussed25. Under high-pressure conditions the transition from ice VII to iceVIII
proceeds without the aid of dopants or elaborate cooling protocols, because the
equilibrium temperature for the proton order–disorder transition at
Tc=273 K is rather high. For ices with
Tc<150 K, dopants are always required to facilitate
proton ordering and thus to prevent immobilization of slow local motions. Order
parameters exceeding 82% of the theoretical maximum were apparently never
established for ice XI, despite considerable experimental effort14. On
the one hand, to generate ice XI from ice Ih, doping with alkali hydroxide,
notably KOH, is required2627, see also the references cited in chapter
11.2 of ref. 5. Also RbOH-doped ice Ih can
transform into a proton ordered state, see ref. 26.
Particle irradiation may be another option, see ref. 27. On
the other hand, HCl is the dopant known to facilitate proton order in ice XIII, XIV and
XV (refs 2, 3). Evidently, these
dopants generate point ionic and/or Bjerrum (=orientational) defects on the ice
lattices and the consequent breaking of the Bernal–Fowler ice rules renders
dipolar dynamics such as proton transfer and reorientational water motion possible on
them. Thus, doping-mediated unfreezing of the kinetics facilitates the exploration of
the system’s ground state. It is plausible, yet largely untested2829, that the dynamics in the corresponding proton-disordered precursor
phases is enhanced most by that dopant, which facilitates proton order most
effectively.This work shows by means of calorimetry that HCl doping and suitable sample preparation
allows one to achieve a transition from completely disorderedice XII to 60% ordered
ice XIV, the highest known proton order in ice XIV. Our dielectric spectroscopy studies reveal that the transition is triggered by
a five orders of magnitude enhancement of the proton-transfer dynamics induced by HCl
doping. The proton-ordering process is shown to be composed of a fast component,
yielding about 20% of the Pauling entropy, and a slow component achieving 60%
order.
Results
Calorimetric entropy determination
With the goal to establish conditions enabling one to achieve maximum proton
order, it is advisable to start from an entirely proton-disordered phase such as
ice XII (ref. 30). We cooled ice XII at high
pressure (0.81 GPa) from 200 to 77 K with HCl, HF, NH3
or KOH as dopants (see Methods). For HCl and HF doping, this results in an ice
XII→XIV transition. After recovery of the samples we use dielectric
spectroscopy to explore potentially enhanced proton dynamics and calorimetry to
examine the degree of order achievable in ice XIV. These experiments are carried
out at ambient pressure on heating and they probe the XIV→XII transition,
demonstrating that ice XIV can exhibit 60% proton order under suitable
high-pressure preparation conditions. Only for HCl-doped ice XIV a pronounced
endotherm is detectable at an onset temperature
Tc=102±3 K, which indicates conversion
from ice XIV to ice XII, see Fig. 1a. This presents the
first precise determination of Tc in protonated ice XIV and is
in very good agreement with the onset (near 98 K) of lattice constant
changes at the transition of deuterated ice XIV/XII obtained by Salzmann et
al.31 from neutron diffraction. Thus, the isotope effect
on the order–disorder transition temperature is small. Figure 1 demonstrates that the transition entropy, ΔS,
depends on the rate q with which HCl-doped ice XII was cooled at
0.81 GPa to temperatures below Tc. For
q≤15 K min−1, we obtain values
scattering between about 57% and 63% of
ΔSP=3.4 J K−1 mol−1,
whereas for
25 K min−1ice XIV was achieved by cooling
HCl-doped ice XII at 0.81 GPa and
q≤15 K min−1 to 80 K. By
contrast, for DCl-doped D2Oice XIV only partial ordering was found
from powder neutron diffraction experiments after cooling the sample at
0.8 K min−1 from 180 to 80 K at
1.2 GPa2. In the unit cell, two pairs of deuteron
atoms were found to show disorder as indicated from fractional occupancies of
0.6/0.4; here, 0.5/0.5 marks full disorder and 1.0/0.0 marks full order (see
Table 2 in ref. 2). We interpret this result to
indicate that ordering in deuterated ice XII is slower and more difficult to
obtain than in protonated ice XII.
Figure 1
Calorimetric results.
(a) Ambient pressure heating scans for pure and doped samples. The
scans were recorded at 50 K min−1 for HCl
and HF-doped ice XIV and at 30 K min−1
for all ice XII crystals. For HCl-doped samples, the latent heat associated
with proton disordering (peak H1, see Methods) increases with decreasing
rates, q, applied during the prior high-pressure cooling at
0.81 GPa. These rates are given in the figure. Hatched areas indicate
the onset of the XIV→XII transition (‘phase
transformation’) or the thawing of reorientational mobility in
geometrically frustrated ice XII (‘orientational glass
transition’). (b) Recovered fraction of Pauling entropy in
HCl-doped samples as calculated from the peak area ratio H1/H2 (blue
triangles) or H1/H3 (green squares) as a function of the high-pressure
cooling rate q (see Methods). The line is drawn to guide the eye.
Each individual point represents an average of typically two or three
measurements. The error bars on the y axis reflect the
reproducibility of ΔS and also include ambiguities related to
the definition of onset and endpoint used for the peak integration. The
error bars on the x axis reflect the fluctuation of the cooling rate
in the vicinity of and through the transition at 0.81 GPa.
For HF doping, only a very weak endotherm can be seen at
∼110–130 K in Fig. 1a, corresponding to
∼6% of the Pauling entropy. Reducing the cooling rate at
0.81 GPa for HF-doped samples by an order of magnitude does not have an
effect at all, unlike for the HCl-doped samples. We emphasize that 60%
proton ordering can be achieved only under high-pressure conditions, but not at
ambient pressure. Even on slow cooling (for example,
5 K min−1) in the calorimeter, we
regained only ∼12% of the Pauling entropy for the XII→XIV
transition (not shown). This finding is consistent with earlier Raman32 and neutron diffraction results31 that were
‘attributed to the build-up of orthorhombic stress during the tetragonal
to orthorhombic phase transition, which the application of pressure may help
overcome’33. Even the fastest high-pressure cooling
rates, q>30 K min−1, employed in
our study resulted in a gain of ∼20% of the Pauling
entropy, see Fig. 1b. Doubling the high-pressure cooling
rate q from ∼34 to 68 K min−1 does
not reduce the entropy gain. It thus seems that the process of proton ordering
in ice XII involves two stages: first, a rapid stage proceeding easily both at
ambient and at high-pressure conditions, which yields about
20% of the Pauling entropy, and a second much slower
stage that takes place only at high pressures and yields about
40% of the Pauling entropy. It appears plausible that
the two processes are related to sets of crystallographically distinct hydrogen
atoms, some of which do not order easily. For deuterated ice XIV, these were
identified to be the deuteron pairs D4-12 and D5-13 (see Table 2 in ref.
2), which do not order even after very slow
high-pressure cooling. For protonated samples, these positions order according
to the calorimetric data. This may be related to the annealing effects observed
for the entropy changes near the ice Ih←XI transition in RbOH-
and KOH-doped samples34.
Dynamics studied by dielectric spectroscopy
Let us now demonstrate that the ice XIV→XII transition can be resolved not
only in thermodynamic but also in dielectric relaxation experiments for samples
prepared using a high-pressure cooling rate of
q=50 K min−1. This rate
leads to a proton ordering of about 30%, cf. Fig.
1b. Dielectric loss spectra, ε"(ν), recorded
every 3 K on heating from 90 to 126 K are presented in Fig. 2a for an HCl-doped crystal. A relaxation peak at
νmax, which defines a motional correlation time
τmax=(2πνmax)−1,
is seen to shift through the experimentally accessible frequency window. All
spectra display essentially the same shape. At the lowest temperatures, the
dielectric loss maxima of ice XIV are out of the frequency range. Assuming that
similar to that for ice XII, for ice XIV the shape of the loss peak is virtually
temperature invariant as well, cf. Fig. 2a,
frequency temperature scaling yields the time constants marked as open symbols
in the Arrhenius diagram, cf. Fig. 3. As Fig. 2a shows, the thermal shift of the loss spectra is much
stronger in the 90–102 K interval than it is at higher
temperatures, signalling the occurrence of the phase transition. In addition,
below Tc the static dielectric relaxation strength drops as
expected for (partial) dipolar ordering. Reassuringly, the transition
temperature, Tc=104±2 K, resulting from
the dielectric experiments, confirms the calorimetrically determined
Tc. Near Tc the activation energy
E increases by about 70% (from 21 to
36 kJ mol−1) as Fig.
3 shows. An even stronger increase of E (from 14.6 to
32.6 kJ mol−1) was found near the ice
Ih→XI transition35.
Figure 2
Dielectric loss spectra of ice XII or partially ordered ice XIV.
(a) Data measured on heating from 90 to 126 K in steps of
3 K for HCl-doped ice XIV (open symbols) and XII (closed symbols).
Partial proton ordering in ice XIV reduces its dielectric loss amplitude and
hence its static dipolar susceptibility. (b) Spectra recorded for
doped and undoped ice XII near 140 K. The dynamics in HCl doped
samples is evidently the fastest.
Figure 3
Time scales from dielectric spectroscopy.
The data refer either to undoped ice XII or partially ordered ice XIV. Closed
symbols refer to resolved peaks; open symbols are derived from frequency
temperature scaling. For the HF-doped samples, the uncertainty in the
determination of time scales is relatively large. The lower hatched area
marks the temperature range in which the order/disorder transition occurs;
the upper hatched area highlights the τ≈100 s regime,
typically associated with (orientational) glass transitions. The solid lines
emphasize the considerable difference of the activation energies
characterizing the HCl-doped samples, that is, disordered ice XII
(E=21±2 kJ mol−1)
and partially ordered ice XIV
(E=36±3 kJ mol−1).
Impact of doping
Now, we examine the impact of various doping agents on the potential enhancement
of the dipolar dynamics and on the establishment of proton order. To address the
latter issue we recorded calorigrams for undoped ice XII as well as for
specimens doped with NH3 and KOH, cf. Fig.
1a: a significant endothermic peak cannot be detected near
102 K, indicating that ice XIV is not formed in any of these samples.
Hence, they represent frozen proton-disordered states, the so-called
orientational glasses. Such states are already known for ice Ih, IV,
V, VI and undoped XII. Orientational glass transitions were observed for ice
Ih near 110 K (ref. 36) and
for the high-pressure ice phases in the 130–140 K range37. An increase in heat capacity at onset temperatures
Tonset∼124–130 K in the doped ice XII
orientational glasses, cf. Fig. 1a, signals
motional time scales near 100 s. This indicates that at
Tc≈103 K proton mobility is insufficient to
achieve the ice XII→ice XIV transition in these crystals.Dielectric measurements reveal reorientational dynamics also in variously doped
ice XII samples. In Fig. 2b we compare their loss spectra
with that of the undoped crystal at T≈140 K, a temperature at
which the loss peaks of all samples are in the accessible frequency window. From
Figs 2b and 3, it is evident
that the relaxation times in the pure and in the NH3- and KOH-doped
crystals are four to five decades longer than those in HCl-doped ice XII. Doping
with KOH, initially considered a candidate to promote proton ordering in ice V
(ref. 38), does enhance the dynamics, but only
slightly relative to that of the undoped crystal. Interestingly, in an
HF-containing sample, we detect dynamics intermediate between that of pure and
HCl-doped ice XII, in accord with the calorimetric observation of its only
partial proton ordering.
Discussion
Thus, together with hints from investigations of ice Ih (ref. 29), we conclude that the doping agent enhancing the
relaxation dynamics most is indeed the one that ultimately catalyses the
establishment of low-temperature proton order. However, how can ices doped by HCl or
HF affect the precursor dynamics of the ice XII→XIV transition so differently,
cf. Fig. 3 (for ice V and XIII see ref. 18)? The answer to this question provides clues regarding
the differing efficiencies of the various dopants. The atomic radii for O in KOH and
N in NH3 are similar, and thus both fit well into the anion site of the
ice lattice. By contrast, the Cl− ion radius is about three
times larger and will give rise to considerable local lattice distortions. As
schematically sketched in Fig. 4, we suggest that this
distortion together with the relatively large polarizability of the
Cl− ion opens new pathways for proton transfers. In other
words, it should be possible that a proton close to a Cl− site
can be rotated in any direction compatible with the ice rules. In addition, the
F− ion is larger than the O atom, but only by a factor of
two, and the expected lattice distortions are not as pronounced. In addition and
apart from possible differences in solubility39, HF is a weaker acid
than HCl. As the effectiveness of HCl was attributed to the creation of
H3O+ defects39, weaker acidity
reduces the capability to enhance proton ordering in the ice XII lattice
significantly, so that HF induces ordering of only a small fraction of protons, see
Fig. 1a.
Figure 4
Suggested proton transfers in doped ice.
Two-dimensional sketch that illustrates ice-typical defects generated by HCl,
KOH or NH3 doping. The arrows in this schematic illustration
indicate possible proton transfers to the central molecule or ion, or away
from it. To keep the illustration compact, the cation/anion pairs are drawn
in close spatial proximity while in real ice dissociation is expected.
Allowance for additional moves in chlorine’s first coordination shell will
result in a sizeable enhancement of the proton motion. In the very compact
high-pressure phases such as ice XIII, XIV and XV, or their proton-disordered
precursors (with densities
ρ≥1.23 g cm−3 (ref. 40)) lattice distortions can conceivably emanate out to
additional shells surrounding a Cl− dopant, thus enhancing the
dynamics further. This appears to be different for the ice Ih and XI pair
(ρ≈0.93 g cm−3), in which KOH
promotes proton ordering, whereas HCl does not. Thus, the role the
Cl− ion plays for the high-pressure ices XIII, XIV and XV
is obviously taken over by the K+ ion (or the larger, yet less
efficient Rb+ (ref. 26)) for the
ice Ih lattice, which is distorted by these ions. However, quantitative
details regarding the impact of lattice distortions and sterical effects on the
local proton transfer and water reorientation rates are largely unclear and call for
theoretical work. Our results suggest that these effects might be key in
understanding the role of dopants on reorientational defect dynamics.In summary, we show that NH3 and KOH impurities are ineffective in
altering the motion in ice XII, whereas for HF doping its speed-up is moderate. Only
addition of HCl generates a dramatic dynamic enhancement. In combination with slow
cooling at high pressures, this allows us to recover 60% of the Pauling
entropy. Our calorimetry data imply that ∼25–35% of all
protons can readily be ordered in the presence of HCldopants, both at high-pressure
and at ambient-pressure conditions. The remaining 65–75% of all protons
in ice XII can solely be ordered using HCl doping together with slow cooling at high
pressure. This suggests that the stresses associated with the change in space group
can be released only at high pressures and with a significantly distorted local
geometry. Under these conditions, the four to five orders of magnitude enhancement
of relaxation dynamics in HCl-doped ice XII that we discovered with dielectric
spectroscopy is crucial for establishing the ice XIV phase. Hence, our experimental
data show novel routes to an understanding of proton-ordering transitions and
thereby paves the way for future computer simulation work directed at ultimately
solving the riddle regarding the mechanism driving doping-induced proton-ordering
transitions.
Methods
Preparation of ice samples
Ice XII can be obtained using different routes304142. In the
present work, doped and undoped ice XII was produced by crystallizing
high-density amorphous ice (HDA). HDA was prepared according to the original
protocol by Mishima et al.43, that is, by freezing pure
water at ambient pressure and then pressurizing hexagonal ice to 1.6 GPa
at 77 K. HDA was subsequently decompressed to 0.81 GPa and heated
at >25 K min−1 to 185 K. At such
high heating rates the competing crystallization channel to ice IV is
effectively suppressed and pure ice XII forms. This was shown in earlier work
for pure water samples44 and now it has to be established whether
this is also the case for the doped samples used in this study. Doped ice XII
was produced by starting from 0.01 M aqueous solutions.
Characterization of ice XII/XIV samples by powder X-ray
diffraction
Preparation of pure ice XII by crystallizing HDA at high-pressure conditions and
fast heating rates was established in earlier work44. In the
present work, the impact of dopants on the proton order/disorder transition was
studied. It is conceivable that the dopants not only influence the proton
dynamics but also the formation of HDA and its crystallization. For this reason
it is necessary to carefully check the nature of all samples after recovering
them at 77 K to ambient pressure by X-ray diffraction. The diffractograms
shown in Fig. 5 were all recorded at ambient pressure and
∼80 K using a Siemens D5000 diffractometer
(Cu-Kα,1,
λ=1.5406 Å) in
θ–θ geometry. Samples were cold loaded to
the sample holder through ambient air, which results in condensation of a tiny
amount of hexagonal ice on the sample surface. All powder patterns, both from
doped and undoped ices, show the pattern well known for ice XII (refs 30, 41, 42). Apart from traces of hexagonal ice, all diffractograms are
free from contamination. In particular, ice IV contamination is not observable
in any of the diffractograms, which is known as an alternative crystallization
product from HDA at high-pressure conditions. Whereas ice IV crystallizes
preferentially at small heating rates, ice XII crystallizes preferentially at
large heating rates. None of the Bragg reflections from ice IV are noticeable in
Fig. 5. Even the most intense ice IV Bragg reflection
at 2θ=31.8° does not appear. The contamination of our
ice XII samples by ice IV is <1% not only for the undoped crystals but
also for all of the doped ice XII specimens studied here. That is, the use of
0.01 M aqueous solutions instead of pure water does not noticeably affect
the pressure-induced amorphization of ice Ih at 77 K and also
does not change the crystallization kinetics of HDA at 0.81 GPa. Even the
heating rate dependence of HDA crystallization does not seem to be affected by
the introduction of dopants.
Figure 5
Cu-Kα,1 powder diffractograms.
Pure and doped ice XII/XIV samples were recorded at about 80 K in
θ–θ geometry. In case of HCl doping, two
diffractograms are shown, belonging to 60% ordered ice XIV and to
20% ordered ice XIV. Tick marks indicating the most important Bragg
reflections for the sample holder (nickel-plated copper), ice IV and ice XII
are shown at the bottom. Hexagonal ice condensed on sample transfer on the
sample surface is marked by asterisks. The vertical dashed lines mark the
ice XIV orthorhombic splitting. Note that the splitting has not yet
developed in 20% ordered ice XIV samples. Ice IV contamination is
ruled out from these diffractograms.
Ice XII and ice XIV can be distinguished by X-ray diffraction on the basis of the
orthorhombic splitting of the Bragg peak at 2θ=34.1°
(Cu-Kα,1), see the vertical dashed lines in Fig. 5. We here compare HCl-doped ice XIV samples obtained
by slow and fast cooling at high-pressure conditions: The splitting is resolved
well for the slowly cooled, 60% ordered sample, but not for the
20% ordered sample (see Fig. 5). This indicates
that only the slow component of the ordering process results in the orthorhombic
splitting and clarifies that only the slow-ordering component is hindered by
orthorhombic stress at ambient pressure. The fast component, resulting in about
20% ordering, by contrast, may take place both at 1 bar and at
high-pressure conditions, because it is not afflicted with orthorhombic
stress.
Calculation of fraction of Pauling entropy from calorigrams
In the present work, three first-order phase transitions associated with latent
heat were detected calorimetrically in ordering samples (see Fig.
6). First, the endotherm at Tc≈102 K
indicates the proton order–disorder transition from ice XIV to ice XII
(see Fig. 1a). The latent heat associated with this
transition is called H1 in Fig. 6. Second, the exotherm at
Tx≈155 K indicates the polymorphic transition
from ice XII to cubic ice. The latent heat associated with this transition is
called H2 here and is known from literature to be
–1,270±50 J mol−1 (ref.
45). Third, the endotherm at
Tm=273 K indicates melting of hexagonal ice.
This well-studied transformation is called H3 here and is associated with a
latent heat of melting of
+6,012±30 J mol−1 (ref.
46). All onset temperatures for the peaks H1,
H2 and H3 are determined by the tangent intersection method. It is noteworthy
that the very weakly exothermic transition from cubic ice to hexagonal ice,
which takes place in the broad temperature interval at
∼180–230 K cannot be seen at the zoom level used for Fig. 6 and is ignored here.
Figure 6
Phase transitions experienced by ice XIV on heating at 1 bar.
Peaks in the calorigram indicate latent heats associated with ice
XIV→ice XII (endotherm H1), the polymorphic transition ice XII→ice
Ic (exotherm H2) and ice Ih melting (endotherm
H3). Peaks H1 and the onset of H2 are shown in a magnified manner in Fig. 1a. The samples were cold loaded at ambient
pressure to the instrument. The differential scanning calorimetry protocol
involves first heating from 90 to 220 K, converting the sample to ice
Ic (H1 and H2), cooling back to 90 K and second
heating to 300 K, melting the ice sample (H3). The second heating
scan is used as a baseline that is subtracted from the first heating
scan.
The transition entropy ΔS is extracted from the calorimetry scans
either by using the ratio of the peak areas H1/H2 or H1/H3 to determine
transition enthalpies, which are then divided by Tc. That is,
there are two independent ways of calculating ΔS from a single
calorigram. The H1/H2 way is shown using blue triangles and the H1/H3 way is
shown using green squares in Fig. 1b. For most scans
ΔS from the two methods differs by <1%, whereas in
some scans the difference goes up to 10%, see Fig.
1b. Therefore, both evaluation methods are shown in Fig. 1b separately. A couple of scans were identified as outliers
and discarded from the data set. The unreasonably low values of these outliers
indicate that part of the H1 peak is missing, because the sample has partly
transformed outside the instrument by inadvertent heating. Please note that the
error bars are smaller for small ΔS values, because data points in
Fig. 1b are depicted as
ΔS/ΔSP, that is, divided by the Pauling
entropy. The relatively large scatter is expected, because in the past
individual latent heat (that is, H2) measurements were seen to fluctuate by up
to ±10% (refs 42, 45) and the data in Fig. 1b are calculated
from the ratio of two latent heats.
Dielectric spectroscopy
The dielectric response of the ice crystals was measured using an Alpha-A
impedance analyser as detailed earlier47. To this end, the
crystal powder was cold loaded at ambient pressure into a parallel plate
capacitor of a Quatro cryosystem and care was taken that the sample temperature
remained below 90 K. The exact filling factor of the cell was not
determined and therefore an arbitrary units scale is used for the dielectric
loss spectra reported above. The temperature stability during each frequency
scan was better than ±0.1 K.As described in the main text, the relaxation times could be determined in a
straightforward manner from the dielectric loss peaks for all samples, except
for those doped with HF. Here, the electrical conductivity was larger than that
of all other ice XII specimens. Time scales for the HF-doped samples were
estimated from approximate shift factors relative to the loss curves of the
other crystals. During the preparation, the HF-doped samples, unlike all others,
were found to be sticky, that is, electrostatically charged, presumably causing
the enhanced conductivity.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Köster, K. W. et al. Dynamics enhanced
by HCl doping triggers 60% Pauling entropy release at the ice XII–XIV
transition. Nat. Commun. 6:7349 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8349 (2015).
Authors: Thomas Loerting; Marion Bauer; Ingrid Kohl; Katrin Watschinger; Katrin Winkel; Erwin Mayer Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: Katrin Amann-Winkel; Catalin Gainaru; Philip H Handle; Markus Seidl; Helge Nelson; Roland Böhmer; Thomas Loerting Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Christoph G Salzmann; Paolo G Radaelli; Andreas Hallbrucker; Erwin Mayer; John L Finney Journal: Science Date: 2006-03-24 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Tobias M Gasser; Alexander V Thoeny; Lucie J Plaga; Karsten W Köster; Martin Etter; Roland Böhmer; Thomas Loerting Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: M A Belyanchikov; M Savinov; Z V Bedran; P Bednyakov; P Proschek; J Prokleska; V A Abalmasov; J Petzelt; E S Zhukova; V G Thomas; A Dudka; A Zhugayevych; A S Prokhorov; V B Anzin; R K Kremer; J K H Fischer; P Lunkenheimer; A Loidl; E Uykur; M Dressel; B Gorshunov Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 14.919