Literature DB >> 26076944

Follow-up barium study after a negative water-soluble contrast examination for suspected esophageal leak: is it necessary?

Thomas R Sanchez1, Grant S Holz2, Michael T Corwin2, Robert J Wood3, Sandra L Wootton-Gorges4.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the value of follow-up barium esophogram in diagnosing esophageal injury or leak if the initial water-soluble contrast examination of the esophagus is normal. An institutional review board (IRB)-approved retrospective review of all pediatric patients less than 18 years old referred to the radiology department for evaluation of esophageal injury or leak was performed for a 9-year period from 2005 to 2014. The majority of patients had unexplained pneumomediastinum, chest trauma (gunshot or puncture wound), or foreign body ingestion as the reason for the referral. Forty-nine patients (age range 10 days to 17 years) underwent an initial water-soluble esophogram immediately followed by a barium esophogram. Forty-six studies were negative on both water-soluble contrast and barium studies. Two studies were both positive on the initial water-soluble contrast and subsequent barium studies. A single study showed the esophageal leak only in the water-soluble study, with the follow-up barium exam being normal. The result of this study indicates that a single-contrast water-soluble esophogram alone is sensitive in the diagnosis of esophageal injury or leak. It has a 100 % sensitivity and negative predictive value. A follow-up barium esophogram only increases the study time and radiation dose to the patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barium; Esophageal injury; Esophageal leak; Esophogram; Water-soluble contrast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26076944     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-015-1329-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  13 in total

1.  Detection of pharyngeal perforation: comparison of aqueous and barium-containing contrast agents.

Authors:  M Keberle; G Wittenberg; A Trusen; F Hoppe; D Hahn
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION: DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT.

Authors:  J H FOSTER; P C JOLLY; J L SAWYERS; R A DANIEL
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Esophageal perforation: comparison of use of aqueous and barium-containing contrast media.

Authors:  A Buecker; B B Wein; J M Neuerburg; R W Guenther
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Barium sulfate as contrast medium for evaluation of postoperative anastomotic leaks.

Authors:  W Tanomkiat; W Galassi
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  Barium or gastrografin: which contrast media for diagnosis of esophageal tears?

Authors:  A E James; R J Montali; V Chaffee; E P Strecker; K Vessal
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Penetrating injuries to the cervical oesophagus: is routine exploration mandatory?

Authors:  T E Madiba; D J J Muckart
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Esophageal entrapment with blunt thoracic spinal trauma.

Authors:  R Steven Delappe; Surjith Vattoth; Sushilkumar K Sonavane
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-10-16

8.  Usefulness of high-density barium for detection of leaks after esophagogastrectomy, total gastrectomy, and total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Jonathan O Swanson; Marc S Levine; Regina O Redfern; Stephen E Rubesin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Esophageal disruption: evaluation with iohexol esophagography.

Authors:  S H Brick; D F Caroline; A S Lev-Toaff; A C Friedman; K Grumbach; P D Radecki
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Imaging the oesophagus after penetrating cervical trauma using water-soluble contrast alone: simple, cost-effective and accurate.

Authors:  L Nel; L Whitfield Jones; T C Hardcastle
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.