Literature DB >> 26076762

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: early results and medium-term oncological outcome.

K Gash1, M Bicsak2, A Dixon1,2.   

Abstract

AIM: Conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer management is now widely accepted as an alternative to open surgery, bestowing specific advantages without causing detriment to oncological outcome. Evolving from this, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been successfully utilized for the removal of colonic tumours, but the literature lacks data analysing the suitability of SILS for rectal cancer resection, particularly on oncological outcome. We report the medium-term oncological outcome from a prospective observational study of SILS for rectal cancer, including high and low anterior resections.
METHOD: A prospective electronic database was collated of all patients undergoing SILS rectal cancer resection in our institution, between 2009 and 2014. In addition to patient, tumour and operative data, histopathological and medium-term oncological end-points were recorded. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyse survival.
RESULTS: Sixty-one patients underwent SILS for rectal cancer by high anterior resection (n = 34), low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) (n = 24) and low anterior resection with TME and hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis (n = 3). The median operation time was 105 (37-280) min and 92% of cases were completed by SILS. The mean interval to resuming oral feeding was 11 h and the median length of stay was 2 (1-8) days. The median number of lymph nodes found by the histopathologist in the resected specimen was 18 (6-44) and all operations completely removed the tumour (R0 resection). At a median follow-up of 46 (16-64) months, eight (13%) patients developed metastatic disease, of whom three had local recurrence. Overall, three patients have died, of whom all had metastatic disease.
CONCLUSION: Anterior resection with TME for rectal cancer can be safely performed using the SILS technique, with acceptable histopathological results and good oncological outcome. Colorectal Disease
© 2015 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rectal; SILS; cancer; oncological; outcomes; single-incision laparoscopic

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26076762     DOI: 10.1111/codi.13034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  5 in total

1.  [Laparoscopic rectal resection technique].

Authors:  M Anthuber; B Kriening; M Schrempf; B Geißler; B Märkl; S Rüth
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Assessment of treatment options for rectosigmoid cancer: single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, and conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Ruoyan Liu; Yanan Wang; Ze Zhang; Tingting Li; Hao Liu; Liying Zhao; Haijun Deng; Guoxin Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Preliminary experience with umbilical stoma in transumbilical single-port colorectal surgery.

Authors:  A d'Alessandro; N Kari; A Alameh; N Pasquier; A Tarhini; B Vinson Bonnet; R Noun; E Chouillard
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Comparison of Survival between Single-Access and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Siripong Sirikurnpiboon
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2021-03-17

5.  Reduced port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is safe and feasible in terms of short-term outcomes: comparative study with conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Ju Myung Song; Ji Hoon Kim; Yoon Suk Lee; Ho Young Kim; In Kyu Lee; Seung Teak Oh; Jun Gi Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 1.859

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.