Literature DB >> 26076580

The influence of sinus membrane thickness upon membrane perforation during lateral window sinus augmentation.

Yen-Hua Lin1, Yueh-Chao Yang1, Shih-Cheng Wen2, Hom-Lay Wang3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate: (1) sinus membrane thickness in patients receiving lateral window sinus augmentation via cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and (2) the influence of Schneiderian membrane thickness upon membrane perforation during lateral window approach.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 73 subjects with 81 sinus lift procedures between years 2010 and 2013 were recruited consequently. Each patient selected had CBCT images in initial and immediately after surgery. The values and correlation between variables of membrane thickness, perforation rate, membrane morphology, residual bone height, and elevated bone height were evaluated.
RESULTS: The mean thickness of the Schneiderian membrane was 1.32 ± 0.87 mm. Perforation rate was lowest (7.14%) when membrane thickness was 1-1.5 mm. As membrane became thicker (≥2 mm) or thinner (<1 mm), the perforation rate increased abruptly. When examined the membrane thickness category, Class B (between ≥1 mm and <2 mm) had the lowest perforation rate. Statistically significant correlation was found between the perforation and the membrane thickness. The amount of the remaining bone height did not significantly correlate to the membrane thickness nor influence the membrane perforation.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that membrane thickness was related to the sinus perforation during lateral window sinus augmentation. The perforation rate was lowest when the membrane thickness was 1-1.5 mm.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cone-beam computed tomography; dental implants; maxillary sinus; paranasal sinus diseases/complications; retrospective studies; sinus floor augmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26076580     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  12 in total

1.  Association of Inflammatory Status and Maxillary Sinus Schneiderian Membrane Thickness.

Authors:  Angel Insua; Alberto Monje; Hsun-Liang Chan; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Mechanical characteristics of the maxillary sinus Schneiderian membrane ex vivo.

Authors:  Angel Insua; Florencio Monje-Gil; Lucía García-Caballero; Jordi Caballé-Serrano; Hom-Lay Wang; Alberto Monje
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  CBCT Study of Morphologic Variations of Maxillary Sinus Septa in Relevance to Sinus Augmentation Procedures.

Authors:  Shilpa S Dandekeri; Chethan Hegde; Pooja Kavassery; M K Sowmya; Bharathraj Shetty
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-06-08

4.  Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening.

Authors:  Bartosz Maska; Guo-Hao Lin; Abdullah Othman; Shabnam Behdin; Suncica Travan; Erika Benavides; Yvonne Kapila
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-01-18

5.  Short implants (≤6 mm) versus longer implants with sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qi Yan; Xinyu Wu; Meiying Su; Fang Hua; Bin Shi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Collagenated Synthetic Bone Substitute Material for Sinus Floor Elevation at Sites with a Perforated Schneiderian Membrane.

Authors:  Sangyup Kim; Jong-Hyuk Chung; Seung-Yun Shin; Seung-Il Shin; Ji-Youn Hong; Hyun-Chang Lim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Factors influencing the sinus membrane thickness in edentulous regions: a cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Motohiro Munakata; Kikue Yamaguchi; Daisuke Sato; Naoko Yajima; Noriko Tachikawa
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-03-02

Review 8.  The maxillary sinus: physiology, development and imaging anatomy.

Authors:  Andrew Whyte; Rudolf Boeddinghaus
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Thickness of the Schneiderian membrane and its correlation with anatomical structures and demographic parameters using CBCT tomography: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Demos Kalyvas; Andreas Kapsalas; Sofia Paikou; Konstantinos Tsiklakis
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-10-19

10.  Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of Schneiderian membranes: Non-infected and infected membranes, and membrane resolution following tooth extraction: A retrospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Yuh-Hau Hsu; Whei-Lin Pan; Chiu-Po Chan; Yi-Ping Pan; Cho-Ying Lin; Yuan-Min Wang; Chi-Ching Chang
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.