Literature DB >> 26076146

Improved survival of patients with hypermutation in uterine serous carcinoma.

Alessandro D Santin, Stefania Bellone, Floriana Centritto, Joseph Schlessinger, Richard Lifton.   

Abstract

•Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is an aggressive subtype of endometrial cancer.•Mutations in DNA polymerase ε gene (POLE) are detected in a subset of USC and confer a strong mutator phenotype.•USC patients diagnosed with POLE mutations experience a significantly better prognosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometrial cancer; Polymerase epsilon somatic mutations; Uterine serous carcinoma

Year:  2015        PMID: 26076146      PMCID: PMC4442647          DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2015.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep        ISSN: 2352-5789


Brief communication

Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is a rare but highly aggressive subtype of endometrial cancer causing a disproportionate number of cancer-related deaths. The overall 5-year survival of USC is only 30 ± 9% for all stages and the recurrence rate after surgery is extremely high (50–80%) (Fader et al., 2013). We have recently sequenced the exomes of a large cohort of comprehensively staged USC all uniformly treated per Institutional guidelines with adjuvant brachytherapy and/or pelvic radiation followed by six cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel (Fader et al., 2013, Zhao et al., 2013). Within the 57 USC patients we identified a subset of patients (5/57 = 8.7%) demonstrating a hypermutator phenotype (i.e., greater than 4000 protein-altering somatic mutations per tumor) (Zhao et al., 2013). This was in strong contrast to the substantially reduced number of somatic mutations (i.e., less than 100) identified in the remaining 52 USC patients (Zhao et al., 2013). All hypermutator USC harbored somatic mutations in the DNA polymerase ε gene (Zhao et al., 2013), a primary guardian of DNA replication fidelity during cell division recently shown to confer a strong mutator phenotype and high incidence of spontaneous neoplasms in mice (Albertson et al., 2009) and humans (Palles et al., 2013). Examination of the POLE and MMR genes showed no germ-line mutations; however, somatic mutations in these genes were highly prevalent in these tumors (mean of 4 per tumor, including 4 premature termination mutations for MMR genes and a mean of 4.5 per tumor for POLE) and more frequent than expected by chance (P = 2.23 × 10 − 3) (Zhao et al., 2013). Here, we report the first evidence that patients diagnosed with hypermutator USC experience a significantly better prognosis when compared to the remaining USC patients (Fig. 1). These results were surprising considering that 2 of 5 of the long term USC survivors in our series harbored advanced stage disease (i.e., stage III) and the remaining 3 stage IB disease (risk of recurrence up to 80%) (Fader et al., 2013). Importantly, the survival results we report in patients harboring hypermutator Type II USC have recently been confirmed by the similarly excellent survival results found in 7% (17 out of 248) of the Type I endometrial cancer patients harboring proofreading POLE mutations reported by the TCGA group (The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, 2013) and in 15% (8 out of 53) grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium reported by Meng et al. (2014).
Fig. 1

Survival analysis of USC patients.

Kaplan–Meyers survival curves for 57 USC patients (5 harboring a hypermutator phenotype vs 52 moderately mutated) according to mixed and pure tumor histology. The median (range) duration of follow-up was 24 (1–141) months in the USC patients while the median (range) of follow up was 71 (16–119) months in the POLE patients. P value was calculated by the log-ranked test for survival differences. Secondary to the low number of patients in the POLE mutated subset, a comparison for stage is not feasible.

While it is currently not understood why patients developing hypermutator Type I (The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, 2013, Meng et al., 2014) and Type II (USC) endometrial cancers may experience such a good prognosis, it is possible that the high number of somatic mutations present in these tumors may render these cancers highly immunogenic for the host due to the large number of mutated epitopes. Alternatively, these cancers might be differentially sensitive to standard adjuvant treatments (i.e., radiation and/or chemotherapy). These data provide novel information for the identification of a subset of biologically aggressive USC with unique prognostic features and biological properties. It will be of great interest to determine whether the POLE mutations we found in USC are of similar prognostic significance in the multiple additional types of human cancers recently found by the TCGA network to harbor POLE mutations (https://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/tcga/).

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict interest.
  6 in total

1.  POLE exonuclease domain mutation predicts long progression-free survival in grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  Bo Meng; Lien N Hoang; John B McIntyre; Máire A Duggan; Gregg S Nelson; Cheng-Han Lee; Martin Köbel
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Early stage uterine serous carcinoma: management updates and genomic advances.

Authors:  Amanda Nickles Fader; Alessandro D Santin; Paola A Gehrig
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Landscape of somatic single-nucleotide and copy-number mutations in uterine serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Siming Zhao; Murim Choi; John D Overton; Stefania Bellone; Dana M Roque; Emiliano Cocco; Federica Guzzo; Diana P English; Joyce Varughese; Sara Gasparrini; Ileana Bortolomai; Natalia Buza; Pei Hui; Maysa Abu-Khalaf; Antonella Ravaggi; Eliana Bignotti; Elisabetta Bandiera; Chiara Romani; Paola Todeschini; Renata Tassi; Laura Zanotti; Luisa Carrara; Sergio Pecorelli; Dan-Arin Silasi; Elena Ratner; Masoud Azodi; Peter E Schwartz; Thomas J Rutherford; Amy L Stiegler; Shrikant Mane; Titus J Boggon; Joseph Schlessinger; Richard P Lifton; Alessandro D Santin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  DNA polymerase epsilon and delta proofreading suppress discrete mutator and cancer phenotypes in mice.

Authors:  Tina M Albertson; Masanori Ogawa; James M Bugni; Laura E Hays; Yang Chen; Yanping Wang; Piper M Treuting; John A Heddle; Robert E Goldsby; Bradley D Preston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Germline mutations affecting the proofreading domains of POLE and POLD1 predispose to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas.

Authors:  Claire Palles; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Kimberley M Howarth; Enric Domingo; Angela M Jones; Peter Broderick; Zoe Kemp; Sarah L Spain; Estrella Guarino; Estrella Guarino Almeida; Israel Salguero; Amy Sherborne; Daniel Chubb; Luis G Carvajal-Carmona; Yusanne Ma; Kulvinder Kaur; Sara Dobbins; Ella Barclay; Maggie Gorman; Lynn Martin; Michal B Kovac; Sean Humphray; Anneke Lucassen; Christopher C Holmes; David Bentley; Peter Donnelly; Jenny Taylor; Christos Petridis; Rebecca Roylance; Elinor J Sawyer; David J Kerr; Susan Clark; Jonathan Grimes; Stephen E Kearsey; Huw J W Thomas; Gilean McVean; Richard S Houlston; Ian Tomlinson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Cyriac Kandoth; Nikolaus Schultz; Andrew D Cherniack; Rehan Akbani; Yuexin Liu; Hui Shen; A Gordon Robertson; Itai Pashtan; Ronglai Shen; Christopher C Benz; Christina Yau; Peter W Laird; Li Ding; Wei Zhang; Gordon B Mills; Raju Kucherlapati; Elaine R Mardis; Douglas A Levine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

  6 in total
  8 in total

1.  Polymerase ε (POLE) ultra-mutated tumors induce robust tumor-specific CD4+ T cell responses in endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Stefania Bellone; Floriana Centritto; Jonathan Black; Carlton Schwab; Diana English; Emiliano Cocco; Salvatore Lopez; Elena Bonazzoli; Federica Predolini; Francesca Ferrari; Dan-Arin Silasi; Elena Ratner; Masoud Azodi; Peter E Schwartz; Alessandro D Santin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Polymerase ε (POLE) ultra-mutation in uterine tumors correlates with T lymphocyte infiltration and increased resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy in vitro.

Authors:  Stefania Bellone; Eliana Bignotti; Silvia Lonardi; Francesca Ferrari; Floriana Centritto; Alice Masserdotti; Francesca Pettinella; Jonathan Black; Gulden Menderes; Gary Altwerger; Pei Hui; Salvatore Lopez; Christopher de Haydu; Elena Bonazzoli; Federica Predolini; Luca Zammataro; Emiliano Cocco; Federico Ferrari; Antonella Ravaggi; Chiara Romani; Fabio Facchetti; Enrico Sartori; Franco E Odicino; Dan-Arin Silasi; Babak Litkouhi; Elena Ratner; Masoud Azodi; Peter E Schwartz; Alessandro D Santin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Uterine cancer, mutational phenotype, and the era of immune checkpoint blockade.

Authors:  Dana M Roque; Alessandro D Santin
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 4.  Replicative DNA polymerase defects in human cancers: Consequences, mechanisms, and implications for therapy.

Authors:  Stephanie R Barbari; Polina V Shcherbakova
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-06-09

Review 5.  Temozolomide-associated hypermutation in gliomas.

Authors:  Serah Choi; Yao Yu; Matthew R Grimmer; Michael Wahl; Susan M Chang; Joseph F Costello
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Clinically actionable mutation profiles in patients with cancer identified by whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Anna Schuh; Helene Dreau; Samantha J L Knight; Kate Ridout; Tuba Mizani; Dimitris Vavoulis; Richard Colling; Pavlos Antoniou; Erika M Kvikstad; Melissa M Pentony; Angela Hamblin; Andrew Protheroe; Marina Parton; Ketan A Shah; Zsolt Orosz; Nick Athanasou; Bass Hassan; Adrienne M Flanagan; Ahmed Ahmed; Stuart Winter; Adrian Harris; Ian Tomlinson; Niko Popitsch; David Church; Jenny C Taylor
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2018-04-02

7.  Enhanced polymerase activity permits efficient synthesis by cancer-associated DNA polymerase ϵ variants at low dNTP levels.

Authors:  Stephanie R Barbari; Annette K Beach; Joel G Markgren; Vimal Parkash; Elizabeth A Moore; Erik Johansson; Polina V Shcherbakova
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 19.160

8.  Identification of an immune checkpoint gene signature that accurately predicts prognosis and immunotherapy response in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Shaowen Li; Chunli Dong; Jiayan Chen; Xiaocui Gao; Xiuying Xie; Xin Zhang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 5.682

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.