V Gotta1, F Cools2, K van Ammel2, D J Gallacher2, S A G Visser3, F Sannajust4, P Morissette4, M Danhof1, P H van der Graaf1. 1. Systems Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Center of Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. 2. Global Safety Pharmacology, Janssen Research & Development, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium. 3. Quantitative Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics/Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., Upper Gwynedd, PA, USA. 4. SALAR-Safety and Exploratory Pharmacology Department/Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., Westpoint, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Preclinical cardiovascular safety studies (CVS) have been compared between facilities with respect to their sensitivity to detect drug-induced QTc prolongation (ΔQTc). Little is known about the consistency of quantitative ΔQTc predictions that are relevant for translation to humans. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We derived typical ΔQTc predictions at therapeutic exposure (ΔQTcTHER ) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for 3 Kv 11.1 (hERG) channel blockers (moxifloxacin, dofetilide and sotalol) from a total of 14 CVS with variable designs in the conscious dog. Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) analysis of each study was followed by a meta-analysis (pooling 2-6 studies including 10-32 dogs per compound) to derive meta-predictions of typical ΔQTcTHER . Meta-predictions were used as a reference to evaluate the consistency of study predictions and to relate results to those found in the clinical literature. KEY RESULTS: The 95%CIs of study-predicted ΔQTcTHER comprised in 13 out of 14 cases the meta-prediction. Overall inter-study variability (mean deviation from meta-prediction at upper level of therapeutic exposure) was 30% (range: 1-69%). Meta-ΔQTcTHER predictions for moxifloxacin, dofetilide and sotalol overlapped with reported clinical QTc prolongation when expressed as %-prolongation from baseline. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Consistent exposure-ΔQTc predictions were obtained from single preclinical dog studies of highly variable designs by systematic PKPD analysis, which is suitable for translational purposes. The good preclinical-clinical pharmacodynamic correlations obtained suggest that such an analysis should be more routinely applied to increase the informative and predictive value of results obtained from animal experiments.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Preclinical cardiovascular safety studies (CVS) have been compared between facilities with respect to their sensitivity to detect drug-induced QTc prolongation (ΔQTc). Little is known about the consistency of quantitative ΔQTc predictions that are relevant for translation to humans. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We derived typical ΔQTc predictions at therapeutic exposure (ΔQTcTHER ) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for 3 Kv 11.1 (hERG) channel blockers (moxifloxacin, dofetilide and sotalol) from a total of 14 CVS with variable designs in the conscious dog. Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) analysis of each study was followed by a meta-analysis (pooling 2-6 studies including 10-32 dogs per compound) to derive meta-predictions of typical ΔQTcTHER . Meta-predictions were used as a reference to evaluate the consistency of study predictions and to relate results to those found in the clinical literature. KEY RESULTS: The 95%CIs of study-predicted ΔQTcTHER comprised in 13 out of 14 cases the meta-prediction. Overall inter-study variability (mean deviation from meta-prediction at upper level of therapeutic exposure) was 30% (range: 1-69%). Meta-ΔQTcTHER predictions for moxifloxacin, dofetilide and sotalol overlapped with reported clinical QTc prolongation when expressed as %-prolongation from baseline. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Consistent exposure-ΔQTc predictions were obtained from single preclinical dog studies of highly variable designs by systematic PKPD analysis, which is suitable for translational purposes. The good preclinical-clinical pharmacodynamic correlations obtained suggest that such an analysis should be more routinely applied to increase the informative and predictive value of results obtained from animal experiments.
Authors: R Padrini; M Gusella; M Al Bunni; D Piovan; R Zordan; G Magnolfi; P Maiolino; M Ferrari Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Anne S Y Chain; Vincent F S Dubois; Meindert Danhof; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom; Oscar Della Pasqua Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Erik Sparve; Angelica L Quartino; Maria Lüttgen; Karin Tunblad; Anna Teiling Gårdlund; Johanna Fälting; Robert Alexander; Jens Kågström; Linnea Sjödin; Alexander Bulgak; Ahmad Al-Saffar; Matthew Bridgland-Taylor; Chris Pollard; Michael D B Swedberg; Torbjörn Vik; Björn Paulsson Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Anna Ollerstam; Sandra A G Visser; Göran Duker; Tomas Forsberg; Anna H Persson; Lars B Nilsson; Jan-Arne Björkman; Johan Gabrielsson; Ahmad Al-Saffar Journal: J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods Date: 2007-05-24 Impact factor: 1.950
Authors: Stephen P H Alexander; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; William A Catterall; Michael Spedding; John A Peters; Anthony J Harmar Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Stephen P H Alexander; O Peter Buneman; Anthony P Davenport; John C McGrath; John A Peters; Christopher Southan; Michael Spedding; Wenyuan Yu; Anthony J Harmar Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Raja Venkatasubramanian; Teresa A Collins; Lawrence J Lesko; Jerome T Mettetal; Mirjam N Trame Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Eleonora Marostica; Karel Van Ammel; Ard Teisman; Koen Boussery; Jan Van Bocxlaer; Filip De Ridder; David Gallacher; An Vermeulen Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: Eleonora Marostica; Karel Van Ammel; Ard Teisman; David Gallacher; Jan Van Bocxlaer; Filip De Ridder; Koen Boussery; An Vermeulen Journal: AAPS J Date: 2016-04-26 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Mark R Davies; Ken Wang; Gary R Mirams; Antonello Caruso; Denis Noble; Antje Walz; Thierry Lavé; Franz Schuler; Thomas Singer; Liudmila Polonchuk Journal: Drug Discov Today Date: 2016-02-15 Impact factor: 7.851
Authors: Verena Gotta; Zhiyi Yu; Frank Cools; Karel van Ammel; David J Gallacher; Sandra A G Visser; Frederick Sannajust; Pierre Morissette; Meindert Danhof; Piet H van der Graaf Journal: Pharmacol Res Perspect Date: 2016-11-17
Authors: Ray W Chui; Joel Baublits; Fiona A Chandra; Zack W Jones; Michael J Engwall; Hugo M Vargas Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 4.689