Literature DB >> 26075668

Chi-Squared Test of Fit and Sample Size-A Comparison between a Random Sample Approach and a Chi-Square Value Adjustment Method.

Daniel Bergh1.   

Abstract

Chi-square statistics are commonly used for tests of fit of measurement models. Chi-square is also sensitive to sample size, which is why several approaches to handle large samples in test of fit analysis have been developed. One strategy to handle the sample size problem may be to adjust the sample size in the analysis of fit. An alternative is to adopt a random sample approach. The purpose of this study was to analyze and to compare these two strategies using simulated data. Given an original sample size of 21,000, for reductions of sample sizes down to the order of 5,000 the adjusted sample size function works as good as the random sample approach. In contrast, when applying adjustments to sample sizes of lower order the adjustment function is less effective at approximating the chi-square value for an actual random sample of the relevant size. Hence, the fit is exaggerated and misfit under-estimated using the adjusted sample size function. Although there are big differences in chi-square values between the two approaches at lower sample sizes, the inferences based on the p-values may be the same.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26075668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Meas        ISSN: 1529-7713


  8 in total

1.  Confirming the Tripartite Structure of the Duke University Religion Index: A Methodological Approach.

Authors:  John W Lace; Paul J Handal
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2018-04

2.  Parental support and monitoring influences on adolescent alcohol use: A peer selection mediation model.

Authors:  Lucas S LaFreniere; Michelle G Newman; John W Graham
Journal:  Ment Health Addict Res       Date:  2021-06-28

3.  Validation study of a wellbeing scale (SPANE) in the Arab Gulf region: A multicountry study.

Authors:  Saad Yaaqeib; Louise Lambert; Stavros Hadjisolomou; Manal Al-Fazari; Heyla Selim; Amber Haque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Self-Esteem Mediates Longitudinal Associations from Adolescent Perceptions of Parenting to Adjustment.

Authors:  Melissa Huey; Brett Laursen; Goda Kaniušonytė; Oksana Malinauskienė; Rita Žukauskienė
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2020-03

Review 5.  Analyzing Immunoglobulin Repertoires.

Authors:  Neha Chaudhary; Duane R Wesemann
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  The Psychometric Properties of the Swedish Version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale: A Rasch Analysis Based on Adolescent Data.

Authors:  Victoria Lönnfjord; Curt Hagquist
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2017-01-11

7.  Translation and validation of Training Needs Analysis Questionnaire among reproductive, maternal and newborn health workers in Tanzania.

Authors:  Tumbwene Mwansisya; Columba Mbekenga; Kahabi Isangula; Loveluck Mwasha; Eunice Pallangyo; Grace Edwards; James Orwa; Michaela Mantel; Micheal Mugerwa; Leonard Subi; Secilia Mrema; David Siso; Edna Selestine; Marleen Temmerman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Using Rasch Analysis to Assess the Psychometric Properties of a Five-Item Version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in Adolescents.

Authors:  Anne Mari Steigen; Hanne Søberg Finbråten; Annette Løvheim Kleppang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.