Literature DB >> 26075654

Socioeconomic deprivation and inpatient complication rates following mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery.

R Jeevan1,2, J P Browne3,4, J Pereira5,6, C M Caddy7, C Sheppard8, J H P van der Meulen1,3, D A Cromwell1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic deprivation is known to influence the presentation of patients with breast cancer and their subsequent treatments, but its relationship with surgical outcomes has not been investigated. A national prospective cohort study was undertaken to examine the effect of deprivation on the outcomes of mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction.
METHODS: Data were collected on patient case mix, operative procedures and inpatient complications following mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in the English National Health Service between 1 January 2008 and 31 March 2009. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between patients' level of (regional) deprivation and the likelihood of local (mastectomy site, flap, flap donor and implant) and distant or systemic complications, after adjusting for potential confounding factors.
RESULTS: Of 13,689 patients who had a mastectomy, 2849 (20.8 per cent) underwent immediate reconstruction. In total, 1819 women (13.3 per cent) experienced inpatient complications. The proportion with complications increased from 11.2 per cent among the least deprived quintile (Q1) to 16.1 per cent in the most deprived (Q5). Complication rates were higher among smokers, the obese and those with poorer performance status, but were not affected by age, tumour type or Nottingham Prognostic Index. Adjustment for patient-related factors only marginally reduced the association between deprivation and complication incidence, to 11.4 per cent in Q1 and 15.4 per cent in Q5. Further adjustment for length of hospital stay, hospital case volume and immediate reconstruction rate had minimal effect.
CONCLUSION: Rates of postoperative complications after mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery were higher among women from more deprived backgrounds.
© 2015 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26075654     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  14 in total

1.  Achieving consistent and equitable access to post mastectomy breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Anne C O'Neill
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-08

2.  Relation between socioeconomic variables and surgical, systemic and radiation treatment in a cohort of patients with breast cancer in an urban Canadian centre

Authors:  Jennifer Li; Sylvie D. Cornacchi; Forough Farrokhyar; Neil Johnston; Shawn Forbes; Susan Reid; Nicole Hodgson; Sarah Lovrics; Kristen Lucibello; Peter Lovrics
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Reconstructive utilisation and outcomes following mastectomy surgery in women with breast cancer treated in England.

Authors:  R Jeevan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  The impact of socioeconomic status on perioperative complications and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  David M Golombos; Padraic O'Malley; Patrick Lewicki; Daniel P Nguyen; Benjamin V Stone; Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh; Douglas S Scherr
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  The Impact of Obesity on Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel F Argolo; Clifford A Hudis; Neil M Iyengar
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  National cohort study comparing severe medium-term urinary complications after robot-assisted vs laparoscopic vs retropubic open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Arunan Sujenthiran; Julie Nossiter; Matthew Parry; Susan C Charman; Ajay Aggarwal; Heather Payne; Prokar Dasgupta; Noel W Clarke; Jan van der Meulen; Paul Cathcart
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 7.  Risk factors for delay of adjuvant chemotherapy in non-metastatic breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis involving 186982 patients.

Authors:  Xiaofang He; Fen Ye; Bingcheng Zhao; Hailin Tang; Jin Wang; Xiangsheng Xiao; Xiaoming Xie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Obesity and Energy Balance Considerations in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Berger; Neil M Iyengar
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 3.360

9.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) as A Preoperative Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Sunghye Kim; Pamela W Duncan; Leanne Groban; Hannah Segal; Rica Moonyeen Abbott; Jeff D Williamson
Journal:  J Anesth Perioper Med       Date:  2017-11-02

10.  Surgical Outcomes for Mastectomy Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Megan E Bowen; Mary C Mone; Saundra S Buys; Xiaoming Sheng; Edward W Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.