| Literature DB >> 26075238 |
Carlos A López-Morales1, Mariana P Miranda-Hernández1, L Carmina Juárez-Bayardo1, Nancy D Ramírez-Ibáñez1, Alexis J Romero-Díaz1, Nelly Piña-Lara1, Víctor R Campos-García2, Néstor O Pérez1, Luis F Flores-Ortiz1, Emilio Medina-Rivero1.
Abstract
According to the World Health Organization, the incidence of malignant neoplasms and endocrine, blood, and immune disorders will increase in the upcoming decades along with the demand of affordable treatments. In response to this need, the development of biosimilar drugs is increasing worldwide. The approval of biosimilars relies on the compliance with international guidelines, starting with the demonstration of similarity in their physicochemical and functional properties against the reference product. Subsequent clinical studies are performed to demonstrate similar pharmacological behavior and to diminish the uncertainty related to their safety and efficacy. Herein we present a comparability exercise between a biosimilar trastuzumab and its reference product, by using a hierarchical strategy with an orthogonal approach, to assess the physicochemical and biological attributes with potential impact on its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity. Our results showed that the high degree of similarity in the physicochemical attributes of the biosimilar trastuzumab with respect to the reference product resulted in comparable biological activity, demonstrating that a controlled process is able to provide consistently the expected product. These results also constitute the basis for the design of subsequent delimited pharmacological studies, as they diminish the uncertainty of exhibiting different profiles.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26075238 PMCID: PMC4449878 DOI: 10.1155/2015/427235
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Characterization strategy performed for Trastuzumab-Probiomed.
Impact of CQAs on safety and efficacy.
| Attribute | Pharmacodynamics | Pharmacokinetics | Immunogenicity |
|
| |||
| Sequence | Nonspecific | Nonspecific | Determined by the sequence variation against endogenous domains [ |
|
| |||
| Higher order structure | Nonspecific | Nonspecific | Determined by molecular weight and structure complexity [ |
|
| |||
| Glycosylation profile | Fucosylated, highly mannosylated, and sialylated variants could alter | Highly mannosylated variants show higher clearance | Sialic acid residues can hide antigenic determinants [ |
|
| |||
| Charge heterogeneity | Effector functions altered if pI differences are >1 unit [ | Major differences alter volume of distribution and clearance [ | Acidic variants are prone to elicit immunogenicity [ |
|
| |||
| Aggregates | Lower biological activity [ | Less subcutaneous absorption and lower bioavailability [ | ADAs presence [ |
|
| |||
| Fc | Affects endocytosis, antigen presentation |
|
|
| Fc | ADCC, phagocytosis [ | ||
| Fc | Higher affinity to specific variants [ | ||
|
| |||
| FcRn affinity | Not determined | Lower affinity to acidic variants | Not determined |
Figure 2Mirror plot of peptide mapping chromatograms obtained from RP-UPLC-UV for Trastuzumab-Probiomed (upper) and the reference product (lower).
Figure 3Sequence coverage of the heavy and light chains of Trastuzumab-Probiomed obtained from the MS/MS analysis.
Figure 4Sequence coverage of the heavy and light chains of the reference product obtained from the MS/MS analysis.
Whole-molecule exact masses by MS.
| Product | Batch | G0/G0F | G0F/G0F | G0F/G1F | G1F/G1F | G1F/G2F | G2F/G2F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Averaged theoretical | — | 147911.76 | 148057.91 | 148220.05 | 148382.19 | 148544.33 | 148706.46 |
| Reference product | B3417B010 | 147907.81 | 148061.92 | 148220.20 | 148378.84 | 148536.86 | 148692.48 |
| B3433B010 | 147897.68 | 148058.03 | 148218.21 | 148377.11 | 148534.93 | 148690.07 | |
| N3477B021 | 147899.82 | 148058.00 | 148218.10 | 148377.32 | 148535.39 | 148690.95 | |
|
| |||||||
| Trastuzumab-Probiomed | TZPP12001 | 147901.19 | 148057.88 | 148218.18 | 148378.54 | 148537.97 | 148695.60 |
| TZPP12002 | 147900.45 | 148057.89 | 148217.99 | 148378.23 | 148537.59 | 148694.92 | |
| TZPP12003 | 147898.55 | 148057.58 | 148217.49 | 148377.84 | 148537.14 | 148694.42 | |
Deglycosylated molecule exact masses by MS.
| Product | Batch | Mass (Da) |
|---|---|---|
| Theoretical | — | 145167.36 |
|
| ||
| Reference product | B3417B010 | 145167.47 |
| B3433B010 | 145167.36 | |
| N3477B021 | 145167.16 | |
|
| ||
| Trastuzumab-Probiomed | TZPP12002 | 145167.53 |
| TZPP12001 | 145167.08 | |
| TZPP12003 | 145167.69 | |
Figure 5(a) Glycan profile for the reference product (upper) and Trastuzumab-Probiomed (lower). (b) Thermostability by DSC for the reference product (lower) and Trastuzumab-Probiomed (upper).
Monomer content of trastuzumab by SE-UPLC and CGE-NR. Variation is presented as confidence intervals at 95% (n = 3).
| Product | Batch | SE-UPLC (%) | CGE-NR (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trastuzumab-Probiomed | TZPP11002 | 99.6 ± 0.0 | 92.3 ± 0.3 |
| TZPP12001 | 98.9 ± 0.0 | 90.8 ± 1.1 | |
| TZPP11001 | 99.4 ± 0.0 | 96.6 ± 0.4 | |
|
| |||
| Reference product | N3597B013 | 98.9 ± 0.1 | 92.8 ± 0.6 |
| N35973 | 99.7 ± 0.0 | 93.5 ± 0.7 | |
| B34310 | 99.5 ± 0.0 | 93.1 ± 0.4 | |
Relative abundance of trastuzumab subunits by CGE-R. Variation is presented as confidence interval at 95% (n = 3).
| Product | Batch | HC % | NGHC % | LC % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trastuzumab-Probiomed | TZPP12001 | 66.18 ± 0.16 | 0.57 ± 0.06 | 32.89 ± 0.19 |
| TZPP12002 | 64.46 ± 0.47 | 0.58 ± 0.02 | 34.59 ± 0.32 | |
| TZPP12003 | 65.45 ± 0.97 | 0.50 ± 0.05 | 33.53 ± 1.08 | |
|
| ||||
| Reference product | B3393B019 | 65.14 ± 0.25 | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 33.93 ± 0.13 |
| B3417B010 | 66.02 ± 0.27 | 0.52 ± 0.09 | 33.04 ± 0.25 | |
| B3430 | 66.40 ± 0.25 | 0.63 ± 0.01 | 32.46 ± 0.16 | |
HC: heavy chain, NGHC: nonglycosylated heavy chain, and LC: light chain.
Figure 6Analysis of the three-dimensional structure of trastuzumab by CD of Trastuzumab-Probiomed (solid line) and the reference product (dotted line) in both near-UV region (a) and far-UV region (b).
Figure 7Comparison of in vitro activity between Trastuzumab-Probiomed and the reference product. (a) Curve of binding affinity to HER2; (b) potency curve obtained from the antiproliferation assay; the solid line corresponds to Trastuzumab-Probiomed, while the dashed line corresponds to the reference product.
Binding affinity of trastuzumab to the epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2).
| Product | Batch | Relative affinity (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Trastuzumab-Probiomed | TZPP11001 | 98 |
| TZPP12004 | 98 | |
| TZPP12003 | 97 | |
|
| ||
| Reference product | N3654 | 119 |
| N36263 | 111 | |
| N36443 | 112 | |
Affinity of trastuzumab to FcγRIIIa.
| Product | Batch | Affinity constant ( |
|---|---|---|
| Trastuzumab-Probiomed | TZPP14001 | 2.71 |
| TZPP12002 | 2.86 | |
| TZPP12003 | 2.25 | |
|
| ||
| Reference product | N35893 | 2.66 |
| N35812 | 2.48 | |
| N36003 | 2.31 | |