| Literature DB >> 26075083 |
L Colombo1, B Sala1, G Montesano2, C Pierrottet1, S De Cillà3, P Maltese4, M Bertelli4, L Rossetti1.
Abstract
To portray Usher Syndrome type 2, analyzing choroidal thickness and comparing data reported in published literature on RP and healthy subjects. Methods. 20 eyes of 10 patients with clinical signs and genetic diagnosis of Usher Syndrome type 2. Each patient underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination including Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), axial length (AL), automated visual field (VF), and EDI OCT. Both retinal and choroidal measures were measured. Statistical analysis was performed to correlate choroidal thickness with age, BCVA, IOP, AL, VF, and RT. Comparison with data about healthy people and nonsyndromic RP patients was performed. Results. Mean subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) was 248.21 ± 79.88 microns. SFCT was statistically significant correlated with age (correlation coefficient -0.7248179, p < 0.01). No statistically significant correlation was found between SFCT and BCVA, IOP, AL, VF, and RT. SFCT was reduced if compared to healthy subjects (p < 0.01). No difference was found when compared to choroidal thickness from nonsyndromic RP patients (p = 0.2138). Conclusions. Our study demonstrated in vivo choroidal thickness reduction in patients with Usher Syndrome type 2. These data are important for the comprehension of mechanisms of disease and for the evaluation of therapeutic approaches.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26075083 PMCID: PMC4449934 DOI: 10.1155/2015/189140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ophthalmol ISSN: 2090-004X Impact factor: 1.909
USH2A gene mutations in our Usher patients cohort.
| Patient | Mutation | Genotype | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | c.10450C>T | c.2276G>T | Heterozygous |
| 2 | c.5776+1G>C | Homozygous | |
| 3 | c.1663C>G | c.2276G>T | Heterozygous |
| 4 | c.2276G>T | c.1663C>G | Heterozygous |
| 5 | c.1434G>C | c.4106C>T | Heterozygous |
| 6 | c.2898delG | Homozygous | |
| 7 | c.11864G>A | c.4714C>T | Heterozygous |
| 8 | c.2299delG | c.1606T>C | Heterozygous |
| 9 | c.1751G>T | c.2276G>T | Heterozygous |
| 10 | c.2299delG | c.14074G>A | Heterozygous |
Figure 1Horizontal (a) and vertical (b) choroidal and retinal measurements were taken manually in a masked fashion by two experienced OCT-readers. Values in the black boxes represent the topographic location of each measurement (T = temporal, N = nasal, S = superior, I = inferior, and SFCT = subfoveal choroidal thickness).
Demographic data.
| Demographic data | Mean | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 43.10 | ±14.09 |
| Duration of disease (years) | 17.80 | ±12.28 |
| Visual acuity (decimal) | 0.66 | ±0.37 |
| Spherical equivalent (diopters) | −3.50 | ±2.50 |
| Axial length (mm) | 23.59 | ±1.29 |
Mean choroidal thickness values at different sites (values are in microns).
| Choroidal thickness | Mean | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Subfoveal | 237.45 | 76.81 |
| 0.5 mm nasal | 230.85 | 88.85 |
| 1.0 mm nasal | 212.40 | 81.47 |
| 1.5 mm nasal | 176.70 | 67.74 |
| 2.0 mm nasal | 151.00 | 62.79 |
| 2.5 mm nasal | 130.20 | 65.34 |
| 0.5 mm temporal | 242.75 | 76.53 |
| 1.0 mm temporal | 231.90 | 70.39 |
| 1.5 mm temporal | 223.30 | 62.34 |
| 2.0 mm temporal | 205.65 | 59.53 |
| 2.5 mm temporal | 194.60 | 63.41 |
| 0.5 mm superior | 233.40 | 71.61 |
| 1.0 mm superior | 227.60 | 71.63 |
| 1.5 mm superior | 220.90 | 74.97 |
| 2.0 mm superior | 219.50 | 57.82 |
| 2.5 mm superior | 219.75 | 64.19 |
| 0.5 mm inferior | 228.40 | 75.70 |
| 1.0 mm inferior | 222.20 | 74.19 |
| 1.5 mm inferior | 209.45 | 71.62 |
| 2.0 mm inferior | 202.95 | 64.94 |
| 2.5 mm inferior | 200.10 | 67.79 |
Beta regression coefficients of subfoveal choroidal thickness on different predictors (univariate analysis). Each column corresponds to a different regression analysis showing the estimated regression coefficient and, in brackets, the corresponding standard error. Asterisks represent the significance according to the legend on the bottom. Among tested variables, age is the only significant predictor of the subfoveal choroidal thickness.
| Dependent variable: subfoveal choroidal thickness | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retinal thickness | Age | Duration of disease | Axial length | BCVA | MD | PSD | Photoreceptors | Edema | |
| Coefficients | 0.093 | −4.412∗∗∗ | −1.475 | 0.046 | 28.314 | 1.585 | 13.075 | −41.027 | −8.168 |
| (0.216) | (1.370) | (2.151) | (19.061) | (68.411) | (3.608) | (8.391) | (35.597) | (34.146) | |
|
| |||||||||
| Intercept | 228.185∗∗∗ | 437.738∗∗∗ | 273.859∗∗∗ | 246.514 | 228.984∗∗∗ | 288.786∗∗∗ | 157.069∗∗ | 253.754∗∗∗ | 249.642∗∗∗ |
| (51.328) | (61.449) | (45.756) | (450.333) | (51.608) | (97.277) | (64.992) | (23.881) | (26.223) | |
|
| |||||||||
| Observations | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
Note.; ∗∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗∗ p < 0.01.
Figure 2Correlation between the age of the patient and the choroidal thickness at different sites. Circle radii are proportional to the estimated correlation. Numbers represent the beta coefficients of the multivariate model for age at different sites (calculated from the interaction term in the model). Asterisks indicate in which sites the correlation between choroidal thickness and age is significantly different from the one found in the subfoveal region (chosen as the reference level in the model).