| Literature DB >> 26075004 |
Jaime Gonzalez1, Wendy Donoso2, Nathalie Sandoval3, María Reyes3, Priscila Gonzalez3, Monica Gajardo3, Erik Morales4, Amalia Neira5, Iván Razmilic6, José A Yuri7, Rodrigo Moore-Carrasco8.
Abstract
Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD) represent about 30% of all causes of death worldwide. The development of CVD is related in many cases with the previous existence of metabolic syndrome (MS). It is known that apple consumption has a cardiovascular protecting effect, containing phenolic compounds with antioxidant effect, which are concentrated in the fruit peel. The objective of this study was to test the effect of apple peel consumption in a murine model of MS and apoE-/- mice. Apple supplemented diets reduced the biochemical parameters (glycaemia, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, ureic nitrogen, triglycerides, insulin, and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA)) of MS model in CF1 mice significantly. The model apoE-/- mouse was used to evaluate the capacity of the apple peel to revert the progression of the atherogenesis. FD with HAP reverts cholesterol significantly and slows down the progression of the plate diminishing the cholesterol accumulation area. With these results, it can be concluded that the consumption of apple peel reduces several MS parameters and the atherogenic progression in mice.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26075004 PMCID: PMC4449944 DOI: 10.1155/2015/918384
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Nutritional report in percentage of lipid composition, total phenols, antioxidant content, and quercetin content of the different diets employed.
| Component | ND | FD | FD + HAP | FD + SDAP | FD + DAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbohydrates (%) | 69.4 | 57.0 | 59.8 | 57.6 | 56.2 |
| Proteins (%) | 21.0 | 17.6 | 12.5 | 18.2 | 17.3 |
| Lipids (%) | 1.8 | 16.8 | 20.2 | 16.4 | 17.5 |
| Water (%) | 6.0 | 15.3 | 19.4 | 18.3 | 12.2 |
| Ash (%) | 6.0 | 5.1 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 5.1 |
| Fiber (%) | 2.8 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.9 |
| Myristic acid (14:0) | 1.6 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Palmitoleic acid (16:1) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 4.6 | 1.4 |
| Palmitic acid (16:0) | 40.0 | 14.0 | 14.1 | 38.9 | 29.7 |
| Linoleic acid (18:2) | 11.6 | 34.0 | 31.5 | 15.5 | 28.2 |
| Oleic acid (18:1) | 29.8 | 44.4 | 39.4 | 32.0 | 19.0 |
| Stearic acid (18:0) | 9.7 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 9.0 | 7.3 |
| Total phenols | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.6 ± 0.5 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.1 |
| Antioxidant activity | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.02 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.02 |
| Q. rutinoside | 0.0 | 0.0 | 16.4 ± 7.2 | 19.2 ± 4.3 | 29.0 ± 1.4 |
| Q. galactoside | 0.0 | 0.0 | 55.9 ± 9.1 | 93.8 ± 16.8 | 46.0 ± 4.5 |
| Q. glucoside | 0.0 | 0.0 | 10.6 ± 5.8 | 29.9 ± 5.0 | 10.2 ± 0.4 |
| Q. xyloside | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.9 ± 4.4 | 16.3 ± 2.8 | 8.9 ± 0.2 |
| Q. arabinoside | 0.0 | 0.0 | 15.6 ± 4.6 | 29.7 ± 5.7 | 20.9 ± 1.1 |
| Q. rhamnoside | 0.0 | 0.0 | 10.2 ± 3.4 | 14.5 ± 3.3 | 14.1 ± 0.9 |
ND, normal diet; FD, fat diet; HAP, healthy apple peel; SDAP, sun damaged apple peel; DAP, dehydrated apple peel. All lipid components have a methyl ester conjugation. Total phenols and antioxidant capacity expressed with mg eq. chlorogenic acid/sample g. The quercetin glycoside expressed with µg/sample g.
Biochemical parameters and initial and final weight and weight gain of the different groups of CF-1 mice subjected to different diets.
| Biochemical component | ND | FD | FD + HAP | FD + SDAP | FD + DAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 102 ± 5 | 164 ± 30∗ | 101 ± 9& | 103 ± 3& | 112 ± 7& |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 56 ± 7 | 66 ± 13 | 53 ± 6 | 50 ± 4 | 61 ± 9 |
| Total/HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 2 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 1.9 ± 0.1 |
| Triglyceridemia (mg/dL) | 106 ± 8 | 171 ± 5∗∗∗ | 81 ± 9∗&&& | 74 ± 8∗&&& | 80 ± 7∗&&& |
| Glycemia (mg/dL) | 311 ± 10 | 343 ± 4 | 134 ± 30∗∗∗&&& | 278 ± 28 | 294 ± 28 |
| GOT (UI/L) | 166 ± 48 | 144 ± 21 | 94 ± 19 | 116 ± 16 | 94 ± 33 |
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 1.0 | 0.8 ± 0.6& | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.6 |
| Initial weight (g) | 37.3 ± 1.3 | 38.0 ± 0.9 | 37.0 ± 1.4 | 36.4 ± 1.3 | 36.5 ± 1.1 |
| Final weight (g) | 44.3 ± 0.9 | 45.1 ± 1.1 | 45.2 ± 1.3 | 43.3 ± 1.5 | 43.2 ± 1.5 |
| Gain (g) | 6.9 ± 0.12 | 7.5 ± 0.35∗∗ | 6.2 ± 0.55∗&&& | 6.0 ± 0.58∗&&& | 6.7 ± 0.60∗ |
ND, normal diet; FD, fat diet; HAP, healthy apple peel; SDAP, sun damaged apple peel; DAP, dehydrated apple peel.
HDL: high density lipoprotein and GOT: glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase.
The results are expressed as the ±SD average. Statistical significance: ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 are compared with the ND group and & P < 0.05 and &&& P < 0.001 are compared with the FD group.
Figure 1(a) Systolic blood pressure of mice subjected to different diets. ND, normal diet; FD, fat diet; HAP, healthy apple peel; SDAP, sun damaged apple peel; DAP, dehydrated apple peel. Statistical significance: ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 versus normal diet. Statistical significance: & P < 0.05, &&& P < 0.001 versus fat diet. All groups have a minimum of 4 mice. (b) Average insulinemia in mice fed with different diets. Statistical significance: ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01 versus normal diet. Statistical significance: & P < 0.05 versus fat diet. All groups have a minimum of 4 individuals. (c) Serum ADMA of mice fed with different diets. ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 versus normal diet. Statistical significance: & P < 0.05 versus fat diet. All groups have a minimum of 4 individuals.
Biochemical parameters and initial and final weight in different groups of ApoE−/− mice subjected to different diets.
| Biochemical component | WT | ApoE−/− | ApoE−/− | ApoE−/− |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 86 ± 9 | 317 ± 67 | 533 ± 154∗∗ | 515 ± 132∗∗ |
| Triglyceridemia (mg/dL) | 55 ± 4 | 141 ± 16 | 185 ± 42 | 146 ± 55 |
| Glycemia (mg/dL) | 157 ± 44 | 161 ± 58 | 324 ± 128∗ | 231 ± 107 |
| Initial weight (g) | 29.1 ± 1.8 | 32.5 ± 1.9 | 34.0 ± 2.2 | 34.1 ± 1.6 |
| Final weight (g) | 32.1 ± 1.8 | 35.1 ± 1.2 | 43.4 ± 4.3∗∗∗ | 40.1 ± 1.9∗∗,& |
ND, normal diet; FD, fat diet; HAP, healthy apple peel.
The results are expressed as the ±SD average.
Statistical significance: ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 final weight compared with the ND group and & P < 0.05 compared with the FD group.
Statistical significance ∗ P < 0.05.
Figure 2Aorta histochemical staining in mice: (a1) to (a3) control group C57BL6WT; (a1): Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, magnification 10x; (a2): HE staining, magnification 40x; (a3): Masson's Trichrome staining, magnification 40x. (b1) to (b3): ApoE−/− normal diet group: (b1): HE staining, magnification 10x; (b2): HE staining, magnification 40x; (b3): Masson's Trichrome staining, magnification 40x. (c1) to (c3): ApoE−/− fat diet group: (c1): HE staining, magnification 10x; (c2): HE staining, magnification 40x; (c3): Masson's Trichrome staining, magnification 40x. (d1) to (d3): ApoE−/− fat diet plus apple peel group: (d1): HE staining, magnification 10x; (d2): HE staining, magnification 40x; (d3): Masson's Trichrome staining, magnification 40x. Scale bar: 200 μm.
Figure 3Image analysis of atherosclerotic lesions in ApoE−/− mice. (a) shows the area of cholesterol expressed as μm2 of the lesion. In (b), the degree of infiltration expressed as number of cores in the lesion is shown. (c) illustrates the degree of infiltration expressed by the color intensity of the area. Statistical significance: ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01 versus fat diet.