| Literature DB >> 26074987 |
Xiwen Li1, Yuning Chen2, Yunfeng Lai2, Qing Yang3, Hao Hu2, Yitao Wang2.
Abstract
The usage amount of medicinal plant rapidly increased along with the development of traditional Chinese medicine industry. The higher market demand and the shortage of wild herbal resources enforce us to carry out large-scale introduction and cultivation. Herbal cultivation can ease current contradiction between medicinal resources supply and demand while they bring new problems such as pesticide residues and plant disease and pests. Researchers have recently placed high hopes on the application of natural fostering, a new method incorporated herbal production and diversity protecting practically, which can solve the problems brought by artificial cultivation. However no modes can solve all problems existing in current herbal production. This study evaluated different production modes including cultivation, natural fostering, and wild collection to guide the traditional Chinese medicine production for sustainable utilization of herbal resources.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26074987 PMCID: PMC4449915 DOI: 10.1155/2015/218901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
The yield of mostly used Chinese materia medica through wild collection.
| Materia medica | Output (107 kg) | Main producing areas | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Huzhang | 1 | Huaihua, Jingmen | [ |
| Jixueteng | 0.5–1 | Lincang, Simao, Dehong, Yulin | [ |
| Yimucao | 0.5–1 | Tanghe, Zaoyang, Huxian | [ |
| Lianqiao | 0.6 | Lushi, Yuncheng, Xinjiang | [ |
| Caihu | 0.6 | Li and Dangchang in Gansu Province; Chengcheng and Wenxi in Shanxi Province | [ |
| Chonglou | 0.3 | Qujing, Dali, Lijiang, Yuxi, Zhaotong, Chuxiong | [ |
| Changzhou | 0.28–0.3 | Acheng, Wuchang, Bingxian, Huadian, Tonghua, Yongji | [ |
| Duyiwei | 0.25 | Gannan, Yushu; Yunnan, Sichuan; and Tibet Province | [ |
| Guanfangfeng | 0.15 | Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning Province, Inner Mongolia, Hebei, and Shandong Province | [ |
| Baiji | 0.85 | Anlong, Xingyi, Duyun, Neijiang, Wenjiang | [ |
Main Chinese materia medica under natural fostering in China.
| Chinese herb | Location | Area (km2) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chuanbeimu | Kangding | 20 | [ |
| Gancao | Yanchi, Lingwu, Tongxin, Taole | 49 | [ |
| Huanglian | Fugong district in Nujiang | 1 | [ |
| Mahuang | Inner Mongolia Alukerqin | 1000 | [ |
| Wuweizi | Qingyuan, Xinbin, Fengcheng | 32 | [ |
| Luobuma | Bazhou in Xinjiang Province | — | [ |
| Ciwujia | Cuiluan district in Yichun city | — | [ |
| Huangqi | Along the Golmud section of the Qinghai-Tibet Railway to Amdo | — | [ |
| Shizhushen | Kuandian district in Dandong | 0.2 | [ |
| Zhuling | Neiqiu County | — | [ |
| Yinyanghuo | Leishan, Xiuwen and Longli County | 27 | [ |
| Jinlianhua | Weichang County in Hebei Province | 20 | [ |
| Bajiaolian | Nanchuan, Chongqing | — | [ |
| Tangbanxia | Tanghe County | 1.25 | [ |
| Lianqiao | Zhongtiao Mountain | 6.7 |
[ |
| Xuelian | Yili city | 0.02 | [ |
| Roucongrong | Hetian in Xinjiang Province | 129 | [ |
| Zhongjiefeng | Guangzhou | — | [ |
Main Chinese materia medica under cultivation.
| Chinese materia medica | Main producing area | Area (km2) |
|---|---|---|
| Dangshen | Linchuan | 3.3 |
| Danshen | Shangluo, Fangcheng, Zhongjiang, Linqi | 51 |
|
| Wenshan | 67 |
| Banlangen | Fuyang, Daqing | 40 |
| American ginseng | Jingyu | 10 |
| Panax ginseng | Jingyu, Fusong, Ji'an | 10 |
| Coptis | Shizhu, Zhenping, Enshi city | 45 |
| Huajuhong | Huazhou | 10 |
| Xuanshen | Zhenping | 7 |
| Changzhou | Luotian | 2 |
| Touhualiao | Shibing | 20 |
| Ginkgo | Chongming, Pizhou | 24 |
| Jinyinhua | Pingyi, Fengqiu | 12 |
| Tiepishihu | Wuyi, Tiantai, Xinshuangbannan | 6 |
| Chuanxiong | Pengzhou | 67 |
| Dihuang | Wushe | 200 |
| Fuzi | Jiangyou | 2 |
| Shanmaidong | Quanzhou | 5 |
| Chuanxinlian | Qingyuan | 3 |
| Dengzhanhua | Luxi | 7 |
| Chuanbei | Songpan and Mao County | 2 |
| Shanzhuyu | Xixia County | 147 |
| Yanhusuo | Fuzhou in Jiangxi province | 24 |
| Kushen | Changzhi | 67 |
| Longdan | Qingyuan | 13 |
The cost of Pinellia production (RMB).
| Seed | Calcium fertilizer | Urea | Organic fertilizer | Pesticides | Employees | Equipment | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount | Price | Amount | Price | Amount | Price | Amount | Price | Total | Amount | Price | Price | ||
| Standard | 2,250 | 36,000 | 1,500 | 1,050 | 225 | 450 | 45,000 | 4,500 | 150 | 480 | 14,400 | 2,100 | 58,650 |
| Control | 2,250 | 27,000 | 1,500 | 1,050 | 225 | 450 | 37,500 | 3,750 | 150 | 480 | 12,600 | 2,100 | 47,100 |
| Difference | 9,000 | 0 | 0 | 700 | 750 | 0 | 60 | 1,800 | 0 | 11,550 | |||
The output-input ratio in Pinellia production.
| Output (kg per hm2) | Value (RMB per hm2) | Benefit (RMB per hm2) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net income | Input : output | |||
| Standard | 3,093.43 | 134,564.21 | 75,914.21 | 1 : 2.294 |
| Control | 2,279.25 | 99,147.38 | 52,047.38 | 1 : 2.105 |
| Difference | 814.18 | 35,416.83 | 23,886.83 | 1 : 3.066 |
The cost under different Coptis production modes (RMB).
| Model | Outcome | Input | Net income | Input : output |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cultivation in greenhouse | 14,730 | 7,100 | 7,630 | 1 : 2.075 |
| Natural fostering under | 14,250 | 4,800 | 9,450 | 1 : 2.968 |
| Natural fostering under | 13,605 | 4,800 | 9,005 | 1 : 2.834 |
Comparison between different models of ginseng production (10,000 RMB/hectare).
| Input | Output | Cost-profit ratio | Net margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural fostering | 11.5 | 23.3 | 1.026 | 11.8 |
| Cultivation | 16.4 | 22.0 | 0.335 | 5.6 |