| Literature DB >> 26074495 |
Mark C Derbyshire1, Louise Michaelson2, Josie Parker3, Steven Kelly3, Urvashi Thacker4, Stephen J Powers5, Andy Bailey6, Kim Hammond-Kosack7, Mikael Courbot8, Jason Rudd9.
Abstract
Septoria tritici blotch (STB) caused by the Ascomycete fungus Zymoseptoria tritici is one of the most economically damaging diseases of wheat worldwide. Z. tritici is currently a major target for agricultural fungicides, especially in temperate regions where it is most prevalent. Many fungicides target electron transfer enzymes because these are often important for cell function. Therefore characterisation of genes encoding such enzymes may be important for the development of novel disease intervention strategies. Microsomal cytochrome b5 reductases (CBRs) are an important family of electron transfer proteins which in eukaryotes are involved in the biosynthesis of fatty acids and complex lipids including sphingolipids and sterols. Unlike the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae which possesses only one microsomal CBR, the fully sequenced genome of Z. tritici bears three possible microsomal CBRs. RNA sequencing analysis revealed that ZtCBR1 is the most highly expressed of these genes under all in vitro and in planta conditions tested, therefore ΔZtCBR1 mutant strains were generated through targeted gene disruption. These strains exhibited delayed disease symptoms on wheat leaves and severely limited asexual sporulation. ΔZtCBR1 strains also exhibited aberrant spore morphology and hyphal growth in vitro. These defects coincided with alterations in fatty acid, sphingolipid and sterol biosynthesis observed through GC-MS and HPLC analyses. Data is presented which suggests that Z. tritici may use ZtCBR1 as an additional electron donor for key steps in ergosterol biosynthesis, one of which is targeted by azole fungicides. Our study reports the first functional characterisation of CBR gene family members in a plant pathogenic filamentous fungus. This also represents the first direct observation of CBR functional ablation impacting upon fungal sterol biosynthesis.Entities:
Keywords: CYP51; Cytochrome P450; Dimorphic fungi; Fatty acids; Mycosphaerella graminicola; Septoria tritici
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26074495 PMCID: PMC4557397 DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.05.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Fungal Genet Biol ISSN: 1087-1845 Impact factor: 3.495
Fig. 1Structural characteristics of the three putative Z. tritici microsomal CBR proteins. PFam domains of the three Z. tritici putative microsomal CBR sequences retrieved. Each predicted protein sequence contains FAD-binding (PFam identifier: PF00667) and NAD-binding (PFam identifier: PF08030) domains canonical for CBR sequences. ZtCBR2 also contains a b5-fusion domain (PFam identifier: PF00173) at the N-terminus. Amino acid sequence length is given to the right.
Number and distribution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBR homologues in filamentous fungal genome sequences Below left: four plant endophytic fungi that had no sequences homologous to S. cerevisiae CBRs in their genomes. Fungal lifestyles were derived from Urban et al., 2015 (footnote a).
| Sequence | Species | ScCBR1 aa identity (%) | ScCBR1 e value | TargetP mitochondrial prediction? | ScMCR1 aa identity (%) | ScMCR1 e value | b5 fusion domain? | Fungal lifestyle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XP_003854385.1 ( | 49 | 1.00E−82 | N | – | – | N | Hemibiotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_003852872.1 ( | 39 | 1.00E−63 | N | – | – | Y | Hemibiotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_003852910.1 | 39 | 3.00E−57 | Y | 47 | 2.00E−78 | N | Hemibiotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_003847738.1 ( | 33 | 1.00E−30 | N | – | – | N | Hemibiotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_756793.1 | 46 | 6.00E−82 | N | – | – | N | Biotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_759922.1 | 40 | 8.00E−41 | Y | 36 | 3.00E−62 | N | Biotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_001799967.1 | 51 | 5.00E−95 | N | – | – | N | Necrotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_001806619.1 | 46 | 2.00E−70 | N | – | – | Y | Necrotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_001801691.1 | 39 | 3.00E−51 | Y | 46 | 5.00E−76 | N | Necrotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_003322373.1 | 48 | 5.00E−84 | N | – | – | N | Biotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_003319934.2 | 38 | 1.00E−47 | Y | 40 | 6.00E−62 | N | Biotrophic plant pathogen | |
| CCA68189.1 | 49 | 6.00E−93 | N | – | – | N | Endophyte | |
| CCA67532.1 | 32 | 1.00E−46 | Y | 46 | 2.00E−69 | N | Endophyte | |
| XP_009850995.1 | 50 | 1.00E−80 | N | – | – | N | Saprophyte | |
| XP_009854993.1 | 46 | 2.00E−72 | N | – | – | Y | Saprophyte | |
| EGZ77533.1 | 42 | 1.00E−53 | Y | 49 | 3.00E−84 | N | Saprophyte | |
| XP_009856344.1 | 41 | 2.00E−53 | N | – | – | N | Saprophyte | |
| XP_009849163.1 | 32 | 2.00E−32 | N | – | – | N | Saprophyte | |
| XP_956601.1 | 50 | 2.00E−80 | N | – | – | N | Saprophyte | |
| XP_965191.1 | 46 | 4.00E−72 | N | – | – | Y | Saprophyte | |
| XP_964971.1 | 42 | 1.00E−53 | Y | 43 | 1.00E−83 | N | Saprophyte | |
| XP_961775.1 | 33 | 6.00E−31 | N | – | – | N | Saprophyte | |
| XP_007925194.1 | 44 | 9.00E−80 | N | – | – | N | Hemibiotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_007926128.1 | 40 | 3.00E−55 | Y | 45 | 2.00E−73 | N | Hemibiotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_007922376.1 | 30 | 2.00E−29 | Y | 32 | 2.00E−50 | N | Hemibiotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_385028.1 | 46 | 1.00E−71 | N | – | – | Y | Nectrotrophic plant pathogen | |
| ESU10740.1 | 46 | 4.00E−59 | N | – | – | Y | Nectrotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_383723.1 | 43 | 9.00E−69 | N | – | – | Y | Nectrotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_382313.1 | 42 | 4.00E−65 | N | – | – | Y | Nectrotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_381102.1 | 39 | 2.00E−56 | Y | 46 | 2.00E−75 | N | Nectrotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_387123.1 | 32 | 1.00E−34 | N | – | – | N | Nectrotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_385079.1 | 30 | 4.00E−27 | N | – | – | N | Nectrotrophic plant pathogen | |
| EME45766.1 | 44 | 5.00E−84 | N | – | – | N | Hemibiotrophic plant pathogen | |
| EME46111.1 | 38 | 1.00E−48 | Y | 42 | 3.00E−69 | N | Hemibiotrophic plant pathogen | |
| EME38673.1 | 33 | 5.00E−37 | Y | 31 | 4.00E−46 | N | Hemibiotrophic plant pathogen | |
| EFQ24978.1 | 50 | 1.00E−81 | N | – | – | N | Hemibiotrophic plant pathogen | |
| EFQ25098.1 | 46 | 8.00E−72 | N | – | – | Y | Hemibiotrophic plant pathogen | |
| EFQ27839.1 | 41 | 2.00E−57 | Y | 46 | 2.00E−76 | N | Hemibiotrophic plant pathogen | |
| EFQ36452.1 | 33 | 1.00E−33 | Y | 34 | 3.00E−53 | N | Hemibiotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_007700426.1 | 54 | 5.00E−89 | N | – | – | N | Nectrotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_007700318.1 | 44 | 2.00E−69 | N | – | – | Y | Nectrotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_007704621.1 | 40 | 8.00E−53 | Y | 46 | 2.00E−76 | N | Nectrotrophic plant pathogen | |
| EMD92868.1 | 53 | 8.00E−89 | N | – | – | N | Nectrotrophic plant pathogen | |
| EMD88525.1 | 44 | 2.00E−69 | N | – | – | Y | Nectrotrophic plant pathogen | |
| EMD86858.1 | 40 | 7.00E−53 | Y | 46 | 2.00E−76 | N | Nectrotrophic plant pathogen | |
| EPQ65715.1 | 45 | 3.00E−66 | N | – | – | N | Biotrophic plant pathogen | |
| CCU81251.1 | 44 | 2.00E−64 | N | – | – | N | Biotrophic plant pathogen | |
| EPQ62420.1 | 43 | 2.00E−58 | N | – | – | N | Biotrophic plant pathogen | |
| CCU78450.1 | 42 | 3.00E−58 | N | – | – | N | Biotrophic plant pathogen | |
| XP_001208762.1 | 51 | 7.00E−88 | N | – | – | N | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| XP_001218611.1 | 45 | 1.00E−74 | N | – | – | Y | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| XP_001215899.1 | 44 | 1.00E−69 | N | – | – | Y | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| Q0CRD8.2 | 41 | 3.00E−49 | Y | 49 | 2.00E−86 | N | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| XP_001212924.1 | 39 | 5.00E−47 | Y | 48 | 7.00E−83 | N | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| XP_001214268.1 | 31 | 8.00E−31 | Y | 39 | 1.00E−67 | N | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| XP_663970.1 | 51 | 6.00E−88 | N | – | – | N | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| Q5AZB4.2 | 51 | 7.00E−88 | N | – | – | N | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| XP_661466.1 | 47 | 3.00E−77 | N | – | – | Y | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| CBF75218.1 | 47 | 5.00E−77 | N | – | – | Y | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| XP_658036.1 | 43 | 4.00E−57 | Y | 48 | 1.00E−86 | N | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| XP_682189.1 | 38 | 5.00E−59 | N | – | – | Y | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| CBF82301.1 | 37 | 6.00E−38 | N | – | – | Y | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| XP_663990.1 | 32 | 9.00E−31 | N | – | – | N | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| XP_755738.2 | 49 | 2.00E−86 | N | – | – | N | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| XP_753636.1 | 45 | 4.00E−75 | N | – | – | Y | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| XP_748717.1 | 44 | 1.00E−70 | N | – | – | Y | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| XP_750202.1 | 43 | 4.00E−50 | Y | 47 | 5.00E−79 | N | Facultative parasite/saprophyte | |
| Endophytes with no sequences retrieved by SsCBR1 | ||||||||
| Microsomal | ||||||||
| Mitochondrial | ||||||||
Fungal lifestyle source, Urban et al., 2015 Nucleic Acids Research. Names given to the Z. tritici CBR genes referred to throughout the rest of this study are given underneath GenBank accessions.
Fig. 2Expression profiles of CBR and related genes in Z. tritici. (A) Mean FPKM values showing expression of Z. tritici CBRs in Czapek Dox broth (CDB), potato dextrose broth (PDB) and at one, four, nine, 14 and 21 days post inoculation (DPI) of wheat leaves; significant differences in expression of ZtCBR2 and ZtCBR3 (* p < 0.05) were found during growth in PDB relative to during growth in CDB. (B) Mean FPKM values showing expression profile of ZtCBR2 and the two neighbouring genes, ZtCYP-24 and a putative hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase across the same set of conditions. (C) A diagram showing gene organisation across the region with the total size of the putative three gene cluster in base pairs indicated below. The two genes neighbouring ZtCBR2 were significantly up-regulated both in PDB and on day four of infection (* p < 0.05) relative to during growth in CDB; ZtCBR2 exhibited a similar expression profile though apparent up-regulation was only significant in PDB (p < 0.05).
Fig. 3ΔZtCBR1 mutants show delayed disease symptom induction and strongly reduced asexual sporulation on wheat leaves. (A) Leaves infected with WT, ΔCBR1-1 and ΔZtCBR1-2 after 11, 14, 21 and 30 DPI; mock-inoculated control leaves at 30 DPI are shown to the right. A total of eight leaves per strain/mock were inoculated and two representative leaves are shown. (B) Mean number of spores (recovered by washing) per 5 cm length of inoculated leaf for WT, ΔZtCBR1-1 and ΔZtCBR1-2 after 34 DPI showing a significant reduction in asexual sporulation of the mutant strains relative to the WT (* p < 0.05).
Fig. 4ΔZtCBR1 mutants show abnormal spore morphologies. (A) Bright field imaging of WT and ΔZtCBR1 spores. Arrowheads highlight examples of single-celled spores more frequently observed in ΔZtCBR1. (B) Representative spores of WT and ΔZtCBR1 strains stained with calcofluor white. (C) Mean cell length for WT and two ΔZtCBR1 strains. Bars represent standard error (* p < 0.05). (D) Mean percentage of single-celled spores for WT and two ΔZtCBR1 strains. Bars represent standard error (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Fig. 5ΔZtCBR1 mutants show reduced frequency and rate of hyphal growth. Micrograph showing the appearance of radial hyphal growth produced from the edge of a 5 μl spore droplet for WT and the two ΔZtCBR1 strains after four, six and fourteen days (d) of growth on 1% water agar.
Fig. 6ΔZtCBR1 mutants have altered fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles. (A) Mean relative abundance of the fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) species 16:0, 16:1, 18:0, 18:1, 18:2 and 18:3 in the WT and a ΔZtCBR1 strain. Bars represent standard error (** p < 0.001). (B) Total FAME content of WT and the same ΔZtCBR1 strain expressed in *** μg mg−1 of fresh weight. Bars represent standard error.
Fig. 7ΔZtCBR1 mutants have altered sphingolipid profiles. (A) Mean relative abundance of the sphingolipid long chain base (LCB) species trihydroxy 18:0 (t18:0), dihydroxy 19:2 (d19:2), dihydroxy 18:0 (d18:0), trihydroxy 18:1 (t18:1) and dihydroxy 18:1 (d18:1) in a WT and ΔZtCBR1 mutant strain. Bars represent standard error (** p < 0.01).
Fig. 8ΔZtCBR1 mutants have altered sterol profiles. (A) Mean relative abundance of all ergosterol and all intermediates in the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway identified for WT and a ΔZtCBR1 strain. Bars represent standard error, all deviations from WT levels in the ΔZtCBR1 strain were significant (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). (B) Diagram depicting the reactions catalysed by the enzymes CYP51 and Erg25 during sterol biosynthesis. Solid arrow represents usual direction of biosynthetic pathway. Perforated arrow represents an alternative route for the CYP51 substrate, eburicol, which may be followed more frequently if CYP51 activity is compromised. Solid boxes surround compounds that accumulated in ΔZtCBR1 relative to the WT. Red circles mark the sites of enzymatic alterations at each sterol biosynthesis step. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)