Literature DB >> 26074172

Need for recovery among male technical distal on-call workers.

Hardy A van de Ven1, Ute Bültmann1, Michiel P de Looze2,3, Wendy Koolhaas1, Thomas Kantermann4,5, Sandra Brouwer1, Jac J L van der Klink1.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to (1) examine whether need for recovery differs between workers (i) not on-call, (ii) on-call but not called and (iii) on-call and called, and (2) investigate the associations between age, health, work and social characteristics with need for recovery for the three scenarios (i-iii). Cross-sectional data of N = 169 Dutch distal on-call workers were analysed with multivariate logistic regression. Need for recovery differed significantly between the three scenarios (i-iii), with lowest need for recovery for scenario (i) 'not on-call' and highest need for recovery for scenario (iii) 'on-call and called'. Poor mental health and high work-family interference were associated with higher need for recovery in all three scenarios (i-iii), whereas high work demands was only associated with being on-call (ii and iii). The results suggest that the mere possibility of being called affects the need for recovery, especially in workers reporting poor mental health, high-work demands and work-family interference. Practitioner summary: On-call work is a scarcely studied but demanding working time arrangement. We examined need for recovery and its associations with age, health, work and social characteristics among distal on-call workers. The results suggest that the mere possibility of being called can affect worker well-being and need for recovery.

Keywords:  age; health; work schedule tolerance; work–family interference

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26074172     DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1046498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Who is 'on-call' in Australia? A new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies.

Authors:  Madeline Sprajcer; Sarah L Appleton; Robert J Adams; Tiffany K Gill; Sally A Ferguson; Grace E Vincent; Jessica L Paterson; Amy C Reynolds
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The Work Role Functioning Questionnaire v2.0 Showed Consistent Factor Structure Across Six Working Samples.

Authors:  Femke I Abma; Ute Bültmann; Benjamin C Amick Iii; Iris Arends; Heleen F Dorland; Peter A Flach; Jac J L van der Klink; Hardy A van de Ven; Jakob Bue Bjørner
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-09

3.  Impacts of Australian Firefighters' On-Call Work Arrangements on the Sleep of Partners.

Authors:  Grace E Vincent; Simone Karan; Jessica Paterson; Amy C Reynolds; Michelle Dominiak; Sally A Ferguson
Journal:  Clocks Sleep       Date:  2020-01-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.