Kathryn Fletcher1, Gordon Parker2, Amelia Paterson2, Maurizio Fava3, Dan Iosifescu4, Diego A Pizzagalli5. 1. School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia; Black Dog Institute, NSW, Australia; Centre for Psychological and Relationship Counselling, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: kat303@hotmail.com. 2. School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia; Black Dog Institute, NSW, Australia. 3. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 4. The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA. 5. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anhedonia represents a core symptom of major depression and may be a potential marker for melancholia. However, current understanding of this construct in depressive sub-types is limited. METHOD: Participants were recruited from the Black Dog Institute (Sydney) and Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston). Diagnostic groups were derived on the basis of agreement between clinician and DSM-IV diagnosis from structured interviews. Currently depressed unipolar melancholic, non-melancholic and healthy control participants were administered a probabilistic reward task (PRT) to assess a behavioural correlate of anhedonia-blunted reward-based learning. Self-reported measures of anhedonia, approach and avoidance motivation were completed by the Sydney sample. RESULTS: Relative to healthy controls and non-melancholic participants, melancholic depressed participants had reduced response bias, highlighting blunted reward learning. Moreover, although non-melancholic participants were characterized by a delayed response bias, melancholic depressed participants failed to develop a bias throughout blocks. Response bias showed no associations with self-report measures of hedonic tone in depressed participants. Positive associations were observed between response bias, approach and avoidance motivation in non-melancholic participants only. LIMITATIONS: Possible medication, fatigue and anxiety effects were not controlled; small sample sizes; inclusion criteria may have excluded those with severe melancholia and led to underestimation of group differences. CONCLUSIONS: Melancholia is characterised by a reduced ability to modulate behaviour as a function of reward, and the motivational salience of rewarding stimuli may differ across depressive sub-types. Results support the view that melancholia is a distinct sub-type. Further exploration of reward system functioning in depressive sub-types is warranted.
BACKGROUND: Anhedonia represents a core symptom of major depression and may be a potential marker for melancholia. However, current understanding of this construct in depressive sub-types is limited. METHOD:Participants were recruited from the Black Dog Institute (Sydney) and Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston). Diagnostic groups were derived on the basis of agreement between clinician and DSM-IV diagnosis from structured interviews. Currently depressed unipolar melancholic, non-melancholic and healthy control participants were administered a probabilistic reward task (PRT) to assess a behavioural correlate of anhedonia-blunted reward-based learning. Self-reported measures of anhedonia, approach and avoidance motivation were completed by the Sydney sample. RESULTS: Relative to healthy controls and non-melancholic participants, melancholic depressedparticipants had reduced response bias, highlighting blunted reward learning. Moreover, although non-melancholic participants were characterized by a delayed response bias, melancholic depressedparticipants failed to develop a bias throughout blocks. Response bias showed no associations with self-report measures of hedonic tone in depressed participants. Positive associations were observed between response bias, approach and avoidance motivation in non-melancholic participants only. LIMITATIONS: Possible medication, fatigue and anxiety effects were not controlled; small sample sizes; inclusion criteria may have excluded those with severe melancholia and led to underestimation of group differences. CONCLUSIONS:Melancholia is characterised by a reduced ability to modulate behaviour as a function of reward, and the motivational salience of rewarding stimuli may differ across depressive sub-types. Results support the view that melancholia is a distinct sub-type. Further exploration of reward system functioning in depressive sub-types is warranted.
Authors: Diego A Pizzagalli; Dan Iosifescu; Lindsay A Hallett; Kyle G Ratner; Maurizio Fava Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2008-04-22 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Diego A Pizzagalli; Avram J Holmes; Daniel G Dillon; Elena L Goetz; Jeffrey L Birk; Ryan Bogdan; Darin D Dougherty; Dan V Iosifescu; Scott L Rauch; Maurizio Fava Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Marie Eikemo; Philipp P Lobmaier; Mads L Pedersen; Nikolaj Kunøe; Anna Maria Matziorinis; Siri Leknes; Monica Sarfi Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2019-03-31 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Chloe C Boyle; Kate R Kuhlman; Larissa N Dooley; Marcie D Haydon; Theodore F Robles; Yuen-Siang Ang; Diego A Pizzagalli; Julienne E Bower Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Yuen-Siang Ang; Roselinde Kaiser; Thilo Deckersbach; Jorge Almeida; Mary L Phillips; Henry W Chase; Christian A Webb; Ramin Parsey; Maurizio Fava; Patrick McGrath; Myrna Weissman; Phil Adams; Patricia Deldin; Maria A Oquendo; Melvin G McInnis; Thomas Carmody; Gerard Bruder; Crystal M Cooper; Cherise R Chin Fatt; Madhukar H Trivedi; Diego A Pizzagalli Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Wen-Hua Liu; Jonathan P Roiser; Ling-Zhi Wang; Yu-Hua Zhu; Jia Huang; David L Neumann; David H K Shum; Eric F C Cheung; Raymond C K Chan Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 4.839