Lisa M Gargano1, Kimberly Caramanica1, Sarah Sisco2, Robert M Brackbill1, Steven D Stellman1. 1. 1World Trade Center Health Registry,New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene,Long Island City,New York. 2. 2Office of Emergency Preparedness and Response,New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene,Long Island City,New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In a population with prior exposure to the World Trade Center disaster, this study sought to determine the subsequent level of preparedness for a new disaster and how preparedness varied with population characteristics that are both disaster-related and non-disaster-related. METHODS: The sample included 4496 World Trade Center Health Registry enrollees who completed the Wave 3 (2011-2012) and Hurricane Sandy (2013) surveys. Participants were considered prepared if they reported possessing at least 7 of 8 standard preparedness items. Logistic regression was used to determine associations between preparedness and demographic and medical factors, 9/11-related post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) assessed at Wave 3, 9/11 exposure, and social support. RESULTS: Over one-third (37.5%) of participants were prepared with 18.8% possessing all 8 items. The item most often missing was an evacuation plan (69.8%). Higher levels of social support were associated with being prepared. High levels of 9/11 exposure were associated with being prepared in both the PTSD and non-PTSD subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that prior 9/11 exposure favorably impacted Hurricane Sandy preparedness. Future preparedness messaging should target people with low social support networks. Communications should include information on evacuation zones and where to find information about how to evacuate.
OBJECTIVE: In a population with prior exposure to the World Trade Center disaster, this study sought to determine the subsequent level of preparedness for a new disaster and how preparedness varied with population characteristics that are both disaster-related and non-disaster-related. METHODS: The sample included 4496 World Trade Center Health Registry enrollees who completed the Wave 3 (2011-2012) and Hurricane Sandy (2013) surveys. Participants were considered prepared if they reported possessing at least 7 of 8 standard preparedness items. Logistic regression was used to determine associations between preparedness and demographic and medical factors, 9/11-related post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) assessed at Wave 3, 9/11 exposure, and social support. RESULTS: Over one-third (37.5%) of participants were prepared with 18.8% possessing all 8 items. The item most often missing was an evacuation plan (69.8%). Higher levels of social support were associated with being prepared. High levels of 9/11 exposure were associated with being prepared in both the PTSD and non-PTSD subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that prior 9/11 exposure favorably impacted Hurricane Sandy preparedness. Future preparedness messaging should target people with low social support networks. Communications should include information on evacuation zones and where to find information about how to evacuate.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hurricane Sandy; World Trade Center; post-traumatic stress disorder; preparedness
Authors: James M Shultz; Toni Cela; Louis Herns Marcelin; Maria Espinola; Ilva Heitmann; Claudia Sanchez; Arielle Jean Pierre; Cheryl YunnShee Foo; Kip Thompson; Philip Klotzbach; Zelde Espinel; Andreas Rechkemmer Journal: Disaster Health Date: 2016-11-28
Authors: Robyn R Gershon; Elena Portacolone; Ezinne M Nwankwo; Qi Zhi; Kristine A Qureshi; Victoria H Raveis Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Henry S Sacks; Margaret Smirnoff; Deborah Carson; Michael L Cooney; Moshe Z Shapiro; Christopher J Hahn; Christopher R Dasaro; Cynthia Crowson; Ioannis Tassiulas; Robert P Hirten; Benjamin L Cohen; Richard S Haber; Terry F Davies; David M Simpson; Michael A Crane; Denise J Harrison; Benjamin J Luft; Jacqueline M Moline; Iris G Udasin; Andrew C Todd; Nancy L Sloan; Susan L Teitelbaum Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 3.079