Literature DB >> 26073477

Under the knife: medical student perceptions of intimidation and mistreatment.

Jill P Stone1, Jacob H Charette2, Donald F McPhalen3, Claire Temple-Oberle4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The progression from classroom to clinical setting can be a difficult transition for medical students. Experience in the operating room is anticipated as one of the most challenging environments for a novel medical learner. We sought to identify common concerns before exposure in this learning environment and examine the experience of final-year medical students on their surgical clerkship rotation in an effort to identify areas where improvements can be made.
METHODS: A 20-question survey was developed after a focus group met to identify potential issues that medical students encounter during their surgical clerkship. Personal and anecdotal experiences guided the development of the survey. It was distributed to final-year medical students and recent graduates (350 individuals) using SurveyMonkey. A quality improvement ethics application was completed before the commencement of the survey, as were participant consent forms. Responses were grouped and common themes were identified in the experiences reported by 2 investigators.
RESULTS: A total of 72 individuals responded to the survey, providing a 21% response rate. Subjects were asked how confident they were in their understanding of what was expected during a surgical rotation. Of them, 52 (72%) responded that they were "unsure" or "very unsure," whereas only 12 and 3 felt "somewhat confident" and "very confident," respectively. Most of the learners felt nervous (96%) and feared appearing incompetent (89%). Common concerns included insufficient knowledge and technical skill, anticipated negative experiences, and feelings of uncertainty regarding medical student expectations.
CONCLUSION: We present common themes stemming from medical student experiences during their surgical clerkship. We comment on perception of intimidation and abuse, the rationalization behind such behavior, and perceived lack of guidance. The intention of this analysis was to identify weaknesses in our surgical training so that a quality improvement plan can be implemented.
Copyright © 2015 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interpersonal and Communication Skills; Medical Knowledge; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Professionalism; clerkship; intimidation; medical education; surgical education; teaching

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26073477     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  5 in total

1.  Medical Student Exposure to Radiation Oncology Through the Pre-clerkship Residency Exploration Program (PREP): Effect on Career Interest and Understanding of Radiation Oncology.

Authors:  T Sebastian Haupt; Todd Dow; Mike Smyth; J Thomas Toguri; Alysha Roberts; K L Raju; David Bowes
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  The operating theatre as a classroom: a literature review of medical student learning in the theatre environment.

Authors:  Stefanie M Croghan; Catherine Phillips; William Howson
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2019-04-23

3.  Medical student mistreatment: understanding 'public humiliation'.

Authors:  Jesse D Markman; Thomas M Soeprono; Heidi L Combs; Ellen M Cosgrove
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2019-12

4.  SOCIUS Mentoring-A Novel Course to Encourage Students for a Career as Surgical Oncologists.

Authors:  Rüdiger Klapdor; Moritz Kleine; Tobias Schilling; Stephan Huusmann; Anja Philippeit; Jill Philippeit; Kai Timrott; Marcus Kruppa; Peter Hillemanns; Florian Imkamp
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-24

5.  Assessment of a course of realistic surgical training during medical education as a tool for pre-residential surgical training.

Authors:  Dominik S Schoeb; Eva Brennecke; Anne Andert; Jochen Grommes; Klaus T von Trotha; Andreas Prescher; Ulf P Neumann; Marcel Binnebösel
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.463

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.